Kenneth B Christopher1. 1. The Nathan E. Hellman Memorial Laboratory, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent findings suggest that vitamin D is a marker for outcomes in critical illness. The purpose of this review is to summarize current biological, observational and interventional evidence in the critically ill. RECENT FINDINGS: Both biological and observational studies support the role of vitamin D deficiency in adverse critical illness outcomes. Interventional trials of critically ill patients show that to improve vitamin D status, high-dose vitamin D3 is required. Critically ill patients have a relatively blunted response to vitamin D supplementation compared to the general outpatient population. Toxicity from high-dose vitamin D in trials in the critically ill has been limited to mild hypercalcemia. Recent evidence suggests that treatment of severely vitamin D-deficient critically ill patients with high-dose vitamin D early in the ICU course may improve mortality. SUMMARY: Vitamin D deficiency is a potentially modifiable marker for adverse outcomes in critical illness and critical illness survivors. Vitamin D supplementation is inexpensive and appears safe in critical illness trials. A well powered interventional trial is required to determine the definitive answer regarding the role of vitamin D supplementation in the improvement of critical care outcomes. Until such data are available, a cautious approach to correction of vitamin D status in the ICU is warranted.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent findings suggest that vitamin D is a marker for outcomes in critical illness. The purpose of this review is to summarize current biological, observational and interventional evidence in the critically ill. RECENT FINDINGS: Both biological and observational studies support the role of vitamin D deficiency in adverse critical illness outcomes. Interventional trials of critically illpatients show that to improve vitamin D status, high-dose vitamin D3 is required. Critically illpatients have a relatively blunted response to vitamin D supplementation compared to the general outpatient population. Toxicity from high-dose vitamin D in trials in the critically ill has been limited to mild hypercalcemia. Recent evidence suggests that treatment of severely vitamin D-deficient critically illpatients with high-dose vitamin D early in the ICU course may improve mortality. SUMMARY:Vitamin D deficiency is a potentially modifiable marker for adverse outcomes in critical illness and critical illness survivors. Vitamin D supplementation is inexpensive and appears safe in critical illness trials. A well powered interventional trial is required to determine the definitive answer regarding the role of vitamin D supplementation in the improvement of critical care outcomes. Until such data are available, a cautious approach to correction of vitamin D status in the ICU is warranted.
Authors: Dayre McNally; Karin Amrein; Katharine O'Hearn; Dean Fergusson; Pavel Geier; Matt Henderson; Ali Khamessan; Margaret L Lawson; Lauralyn McIntyre; Stephanie Redpath; Hope A Weiler; Kusum Menon Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2017-12-08
Authors: Jessica Lasky-Su; Amber Dahlin; Augusto A Litonjua; Angela J Rogers; Michael J McGeachie; Rebecca M Baron; Lee Gazourian; Diana Barragan-Bradford; Laura E Fredenburgh; Augustine M K Choi; Kris M Mogensen; Sadeq A Quraishi; Karin Amrein; Kenneth B Christopher Journal: Crit Care Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Pierre Kory; Ginfranco Umberto Meduri; Jose Iglesias; Joseph Varon; Flavio Adsuara Cadegiani; Paul E Marik Journal: J Clin Med Res Date: 2022-02-24
Authors: Glaucia R Nogueira; Paula S Azevedo; Bertha F Polegato; Leonardo A M Zornoff; Sergio A R Paiva; Celia R Nogueira; Natalia C Araujo; Bruno H M Carmona; Sandro J Conde; Marcos F Minicucci Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 2.365