Literature DB >> 25635593

Randomized double-blinded comparison of norepinephrine and phenylephrine for maintenance of blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Warwick D Ngan Kee1, Shara W Y Lee, Floria F Ng, Perpetua E Tan, Kim S Khaw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, phenylephrine can cause reflexive decreases in maternal heart rate and cardiac output. Norepinephrine has weak β-adrenergic receptor agonist activity in addition to potent α-adrenergic receptor activity and therefore may be suitable for maintaining blood pressure with less negative effects on heart rate and cardiac output compared with phenylephrine.
METHODS: In a randomized, double-blinded study, 104 healthy patients having cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomized to have systolic blood pressure maintained with a computer-controlled infusion of norepinephrine 5 μg/ml or phenylephrine 100 μg/ml. The primary outcome compared was cardiac output. Blood pressure heart rate and neonatal outcome were also compared.
RESULTS: Normalized cardiac output 5 min after induction was greater in the norepinephrine group versus the phenylephrine group (median 102.7% [interquartile range, 94.3 to 116.7%] versus 93.8% [85.0 to 103.1%], P = 0.004, median difference 9.8%, 95% CI of difference between medians 2.8 to 16.1%). From induction until uterine incision, for norepinephrine versus phenylephrine, systolic blood pressure and stroke volume were similar, heart rate and cardiac output were greater, systemic vascular resistance was lower, and the incidence of bradycardia was smaller. Neonatal outcome was similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: When given by computer-controlled infusion during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, norepinephrine was effective for maintaining blood pressure and was associated with greater heart rate and cardiac output compared with phenylephrine. Further work would be of interest to confirm the safety and efficacy of norepinephrine as a vasopressor in obstetric patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25635593     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  51 in total

1.  Do fetuses need vasopressors just before their birth?

Authors:  Hiroyuki Sumikura
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Performance of a closed-loop feedback computer-controlled infusion system for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomized controlled comparison of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine.

Authors:  Warwick D Ngan Kee; Kim S Khaw; Yuk-Ho Tam; Floria F Ng; Shara W Lee
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Ropivacaine vs. levobupivacaine: Analgesic effect of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia during childbirth and effects on neonatal Apgar scores, as well as maternal vital signs.

Authors:  Qiuju Cheng; Weiqiang Zhang; Yanling Lu; Jinhai Chen; Hang Tian
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Patient blood management in obstetrics: prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. A NATA consensus statement.

Authors:  Manuel Muñoz; Jakob Stensballe; Anne-Sophie Ducloy-Bouthors; Marie-Pierre Bonnet; Edoardo De Robertis; Ino Fornet; François Goffinet; Stefan Hofer; Wolfgang Holzgreve; Susana Manrique; Jacky Nizard; François Christory; Charles-Marc Samama; Jean-François Hardy
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  Does prophylactic ondansetron reduce norepinephrine consumption in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia?

Authors:  Feride Karacaer; Ebru Biricik; İlker Ünal; Selim Büyükkurt; Hakkı Ünlügenç
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Norepinephrine intravenous prophylactic bolus versus rescue bolus to prevent and treat maternal hypotension after combined spinal and epidural anesthesia during cesarean delivery: a sequential dose-finding study.

Authors:  Tao Xu; Jing Zheng; Xiao-Hu An; Zi-Feng Xu; Fang Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

8.  A comparative study of serotonin and norepinephrine as adjuncts to improve cutaneous antinociception of mexiletine in response to skin pinpricks in rats.

Authors:  Mingming Han; Fang Kang; Chengwei Yang; Mingyu Zhai; Kesong Zheng; Ting Wang; Ziyou Liu; Juan Li
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.219

9.  Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  Cheryl Chooi; Julia J Cox; Richard S Lumb; Philippa Middleton; Mark Chemali; Richard S Emmett; Scott W Simmons; Allan M Cyna
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-01

10.  Effects of different vasopressors on the contraction of the superior mesenteric artery and uterine artery in rats during late pregnancy.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Limei Liao; Xiaohui Tang; Bin Li; Shaoqiang Huang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.