Literature DB >> 25635590

Can structural features of kinase receptors provide clues on selectivity and inhibition? A molecular modeling study.

Sarangan Ravichandran1, Brian T Luke2, Jack R Collins2.   

Abstract

Cancer is a complex disease resulting from the uncontrolled proliferation of cell signaling events. Protein kinases have been identified as central molecules that participate overwhelmingly in oncogenic events, thus becoming key targets for anticancer drugs. A majority of studies converged on the idea that ligand-binding pockets of kinases retain clues to the inhibiting abilities and cross-reacting tendencies of inhibitor drugs. Even though these ideas are critical for drug discovery, validating them using experiments is not only difficult, but also in some cases infeasible. To overcome these limitations and to test these ideas at the molecular level, we present here the results of receptor-focused in-silico docking of nine marketed drugs to 19 different wild-type and mutated kinases chosen from a wide range of families. This investigation highlights the need for using relevant models to explain the correct inhibition trends and the results are used to make predictions that might be able to influence future experiments. Our simulation studies are able to correctly predict the primary targets for each drug studied in majority of cases and our results agree with the existing findings. Our study shows that the conformations a given receptor acquires during kinase activation, and their micro-environment, defines the ligand partners. Type II drugs display high compatibility and selectivity for DFG-out kinase conformations. On the other hand Type I drugs are less selective and show binding preferences for both the open and closed forms of selected kinases. Using this receptor-focused approach, it is possible to capture the observed fold change in binding affinities between the wild-type and disease-centric mutations in ABL kinase for Imatinib and the second-generation ABL drugs. The effects of mutation are also investigated for two other systems, EGFR and B-Raf. Finally, by including pathway information in the design it is possible to model kinase inhibitors with potentially fewer side-effects.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity; Biological Pathways; Cross-reactivity; Docking; Kinase drugs; Mutation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25635590      PMCID: PMC4361267          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2014.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Graph Model        ISSN: 1093-3263            Impact factor:   2.518


  67 in total

1.  Inhibition of c-ABL sensitizes breast cancer cells to the dual ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib (GW572016).

Authors:  Yuan-Hung Lo; Po-Chun Ho; Huajun Zhao; Shao-Chun Wang
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Hybrid compound design to overcome the gatekeeper T338M mutation in cSrc.

Authors:  Matthäus Getlik; Christian Grütter; Jeffrey R Simard; Sabine Klüter; Matthias Rabiller; Haridas B Rode; Armin Robubi; Daniel Rauh
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  A novel mode of Gleevec binding is revealed by the structure of spleen tyrosine kinase.

Authors:  Shane Atwell; Jason M Adams; John Badger; Michelle D Buchanan; Ingeborg K Feil; Karen J Froning; Xia Gao; Jörg Hendle; Kevin Keegan; Barbara C Leon; Hans J Müller-Dieckmann; Vicki L Nienaber; Brian W Noland; Kai Post; K R Rajashankar; Aurora Ramos; Marijane Russell; Stephen K Burley; Sean G Buchanan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Novel D761Y and common secondary T790M mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant lung adenocarcinomas with acquired resistance to kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Marissa N Balak; Yixuan Gong; Gregory J Riely; Romel Somwar; Allan R Li; Maureen F Zakowski; Anne Chiang; Guangli Yang; Ouathek Ouerfelli; Mark G Kris; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller; William Pao
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Tyrosine-phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor and cellular p130 provide high affinity binding substrates to analyze Crk-phosphotyrosine-dependent interactions in vitro.

Authors:  R B Birge; J E Fajardo; B J Mayer; H Hanafusa
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Structural basis for the autoinhibition of c-Abl tyrosine kinase.

Authors:  Bhushan Nagar; Oliver Hantschel; Matthew A Young; Klaus Scheffzek; Darren Veach; William Bornmann; Bayard Clarkson; Giulio Superti-Furga; John Kuriyan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Characterization of AMN107, a selective inhibitor of native and mutant Bcr-Abl.

Authors:  Ellen Weisberg; Paul W Manley; Werner Breitenstein; Josef Brüggen; Sandra W Cowan-Jacob; Arghya Ray; Brian Huntly; Doriano Fabbro; Gabriele Fendrich; Elizabeth Hall-Meyers; Andrew L Kung; Jürgen Mestan; George Q Daley; Linda Callahan; Laurie Catley; Cara Cavazza; Mohammad Azam; Azam Mohammed; Donna Neuberg; Renee D Wright; D Gary Gilliland; James D Griffin
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Predicting inactive conformations of protein kinases using active structures: conformational selection of type-II inhibitors.

Authors:  Min Xu; Lu Yu; Bo Wan; Long Yu; Qiang Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Targeting the cancer kinome through polypharmacology.

Authors:  Zachary A Knight; Henry Lin; Kevan M Shokat
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 60.716

View more
  2 in total

1.  The oleocanthal-based homovanillyl sinapate as a novel c-Met inhibitor.

Authors:  Mohamed M Mohyeldin; Mohamed R Akl; Hassan Y Ebrahim; Ana Maria Dragoi; Samantha Dykes; James A Cardelli; Khalid A El Sayed
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-31

2.  Molecular modeling provides a structural basis for PERK inhibitor selectivity towards RIPK1.

Authors:  Chetan Chintha; Antonio Carlesso; Adrienne M Gorman; Afshin Samali; Leif A Eriksson
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 4.036

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.