Literature DB >> 25634908

Differences in the microstructural properties of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Nathan W Skelley1, Ryan M Castile2, Timothy E York2, Viktor Gruev2, Spencer P Lake3, Robert H Brophy4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tissue properties of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) have not been previously characterized with real-time dynamic testing. The current study used a novel polarized light technique to measure the material and microstructural properties of the ACL. HYPOTHESIS: The AM and PL bundles of the ACL have similar material and microstructural properties. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: The AM and PL bundles were isolated from 16 human cadaveric ACLs (11 male, 5 female; average age, 41 years [range, 24-53 years]). Three samples from each bundle were loaded in uniaxial tension, and a custom-built polarized light imaging camera was used to quantify collagen fiber alignment in real time. A bilinear curve fit was applied to the stress-strain data of a quasistatic ramp-to-failure to quantify the moduli in the toe and linear regions. Fiber alignment was quantified at zero strain, the transition point of the bilinear fit, and in the linear portion of the stress-strain curve by computing the degree of linear polarization (DoLP) and angle of polarization (AoP), which are measures of the strength and direction of collagen alignment, respectively. Data were compared using t tests.
RESULTS: The AM bundle exhibited significantly larger toe-region (AM 7.2 MPa vs. PL 4.2 MPa; P < .001) and linear-region moduli (AM 27.0 MPa vs. PL 16.1 MPa; P = .017) compared with the PL bundle. Average DoLP values were similar at low strain but were significantly larger (ie, more uniform alignment) for the AM bundle in the linear region of the stress-strain curve (AM 0.22 vs. PL 0.19; P = .036) compared with the PL bundle. The standard deviation AoP values was larger for the PL bundle at both transition (P = .041) and linear-region strain (P = .014), indicating more disperse orientation.
CONCLUSION: Material and microstructural properties of the AM and PL bundles of the ACL differ during loading. The AM bundle possessed higher tissue modulus and failure stress, as well as more uniform fiber alignment under load. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These insights into native ligament microstructure can be used to assess graft options for ACL reconstruction and optimize surgical reconstruction techniques.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; biomechanical; fiber alignment; mapping; tensile properties

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25634908     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514566192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  6 in total

1.  Functionally Distinct Tendons From Elastin Haploinsufficient Mice Exhibit Mild Stiffening and Tendon-Specific Structural Alteration.

Authors:  Jeremy D Eekhoff; Fei Fang; Lindsey G Kahan; Gabriela Espinosa; Austin J Cocciolone; Jessica E Wagenseil; Robert P Mecham; Spencer P Lake
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  The Complex Relationship Between In Vivo ACL Elongation and Knee Kinematics During Walking and Running.

Authors:  Kanto Nagai; Tom Gale; Daisuke Chiba; Favian Su; FreddieH Fu; William Anderst
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Tensile properties of a split quadriceps graft for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  R Matthew Miller; Amir Ata Rahnemai-Azar; Levent Sürer; Fabio V Arilla; Freddie H Fu; Richard E Debski; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Regional Differences in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Signal Intensity After Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Ata M Kiapour; Sean W Flannery; Martha M Murray; Patricia E Miller; Benedikt L Proffen; Nicholas Sant; Gabriela Portilla; Ryan Sanborn; Christina Freiberger; Rachael Henderson; Samuel Barnett; Kirsten Ecklund; Yi-Meng Yen; Dennis E Kramer; Lyle J Micheli; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Loading mechanisms of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Mélanie L Beaulieu; James A Ashton-Miller; Edward M Wojtys
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.896

6.  Contemporary Principles for Postoperative Rehabilitation and Return to Sport for Athletes Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Charles R Badawy; Kyleen Jan; Edward C Beck; Niles Fleet; Jeffrey Taylor; Kevin Ford; Brian R Waterman
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.