Literature DB >> 25634779

FDG PET-CT for lymph node staging of bladder cancer: a prospective study of patients with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.

In Gab Jeong1, Sungwoo Hong, Dalsan You, Jun Hyuk Hong, Hanjong Ahn, Choung-Soo Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for lymph node (LN) staging of bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy compared to conventional CT.
METHODS: A total of 61 patients underwent FDG PET-CT before RC and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. A template for extended pelvic lymphadenectomy to the level of the inferior mesenteric artery was divided into 11 anatomic nodal packets. Definitive pathologic findings of resected LNs were correlated with the results of FDG PET-CT and CT alone in a patient- and nodal packet-based manner.
RESULTS: Among the 61 patients, pathological staging confirmed LN metastasis in 17 patients (27.9 %). In total, 627 LN packets (2580 LNs) were resected and histologically evaluated. The mean number of LNs removed was 42 (median 40; range 22-118). Of the 627 LN packets removed, 27 packets (4.3 %) were positive for LN metastasis based on pathologic analysis. On a patient-based analysis, FDG PET-CT and conventional CT showed a sensitivity of 47.1 and 29.4 %, respectively, specificity of 93.2 and 97.7 %, respectively, positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.7 and 78.2 %, respectively, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 82.0 and 78.2 %, respectively. On a nodal packet-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 14.8, 97.8, 23.5, and 96.2 %, respectively, for PET-CT and 11.1, 98.7, 27.3, and 96.1 %, respectively, for conventional CT.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined FDG PET-CT did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of conventional CT for the detection of LN metastasis in bladder cancer patients scheduled for RC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25634779     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4369-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative Imaging for Clinical Staging Prior to Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Cory M Hugen; Vinay Duddalwar; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Advances in Imaging in Prostate and Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Laura M Douglass; Victoria Chernyak; Kara L Watts
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Comparative sensitivity and specificity of imaging modalities in staging bladder cancer prior to radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jack Crozier; Nathan Papa; Marlon Perera; Brian Ngo; Damien Bolton; Shomik Sengupta; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [Positron-emission tomography in urooncology].

Authors:  T Maurer; H Kübler; J E Gschwend; M Eiber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Optimization of Preoperative Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Using Radiomics on Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Martijn P A Starmans; Li Shen Ho; Fokko Smits; Nick Beije; Inge de Kruijff; Joep J de Jong; Diederik M Somford; Egbert R Boevé; Ed Te Slaa; Evelyne C C Cauberg; Sjoerd Klaver; Antoine G van der Heijden; Carl J Wijburg; Addy C M van de Luijtgaarden; Harm H E van Melick; Ella Cauffman; Peter de Vries; Rens Jacobs; Wiro J Niessen; Jacob J Visser; Stefan Klein; Joost L Boormans; Astrid A M van der Veldt
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-30

6.  The influence of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography on the N- and M-staging and subsequent clinical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Youpei Lin; Huanhuan Chong; Guohe Song; Chenhao Zhang; Liangqing Dong; Ling Aye; Fei Liang; Shuaixi Yang; Mengsu Zeng; Guangyu Ding; Shu Zhang; Jieyi Shi; Aiwu Ke; Xiaoying Wang; Jian Zhou; Jia Fan; Qiang Gao
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 8.265

7.  Guideline of guidelines: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas Pavlos Omorphos; John Carlo Pansaon Piedad; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-09-21

8.  Integrated analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT improves preoperative lymph node staging for patients with invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Antoine Girard; Mathieu Rouanne; Sarah Taconet; Camélia Radulescu; Yann Neuzillet; Astrid Girma; Aurélie Beaufrere; Thierry Lebret; Elise Le Stanc; Jean-François Grellier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  A glance at imaging bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ebru Salmanoglu; Ethan Halpern; Edouard J Trabulsi; Sung Kim; Mathew L Thakur
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16

Review 10.  Imaging and Management of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Vincenzo K Wong; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Corey T Jensen; Catherine E Devine
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.