Literature DB >> 25634752

Smad4 loss in esophageal adenocarcinoma is associated with an increased propensity for disease recurrence and poor survival.

Aatur D Singhi1, Tyler J Foxwell, Katie Nason, Kristi L Cressman, Kevin M McGrath, Weijing Sun, Nathan Bahary, Herbert J Zeh, Ryan M Levy, James D Luketich, Jon M Davison.   

Abstract

Previously regarded as a rare neoplasm, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has risen rapidly in recent decades. It is often discovered late in the disease process and has a dismal prognosis. Current prognostic markers including clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic findings have limited utility and do not consider the biology of this deadly disease. Genome-wide analyses have identified SMAD4 inactivation in a subset of tumors. Although Smad4 has been extensively studied in other gastrointestinal malignancies, its role in esophageal adenocarcinoma remains to be defined. Herein, we show, in a large cohort of esophageal adenocarcinomas, Smad4 loss by immunohistochemistry in 21 of 205 (10%) tumors and that Smad4 loss correlated with increased postoperative recurrence (P=0.040). Further, patients whose tumors lacked Smad4 had shorter time to recurrence (TTR) (P=0.007) and poor overall survival (OS) (P=0.011). The median TTR and OS of patients with Smad4-negative tumors was 13 and 16 months, respectively, as compared with 23 and 22 months, respectively, among patients with Smad4-positive tumors. In multivariate analyses, Smad4 loss was a prognostic factor for both TTR and OS, independent of histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor stage, and lymph node status. Considering Smad4 loss correlated with postoperative locoregional and/or distant metastases, Smad4 was also assessed in a separate cohort of 5 locoregional recurrences and 43 metastatic esophageal adenocarcinomas. In contrast to primary tumors, a higher prevalence of Smad4 loss was observed in metastatic disease (44% vs. 10%). In summary, loss of Smad4 protein expression is an independent prognostic factor for TTR and OS that correlates with increased propensity for disease recurrence and poor survival in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma after surgical resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25634752      PMCID: PMC4374440          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  32 in total

1.  Loss of Dpc4 expression in colonic adenocarcinomas correlates with the presence of metastatic disease.

Authors:  A Maitra; K Molberg; J Albores-Saavedra; G Lindberg
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Enzinger; Robert J Mayer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate.

Authors:  G G Jamieson; G Mathew; R Ludemann; J Wayman; J C Myers; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The SMAD4 protein and prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M Tascilar; H G Skinner; C Rosty; T Sohn; R E Wilentz; G J Offerhaus; V Adsay; R A Abrams; J L Cameron; S E Kern; C J Yeo; R H Hruban; M Goggins
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Nuclear localization of Dpc4 (Madh4, Smad4) in colorectal carcinomas and relation to mismatch repair/transforming growth factor-beta receptor defects.

Authors:  E Montgomery; M Goggins; S Zhou; P Argani; R Wilentz; M Kaushal; S Booker; K Romans; P Bhargava; R Hruban; S Kern
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Jan B F Hulscher; Johanna W van Sandick; Angela G E M de Boer; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan G P Tijssen; Paul Fockens; Peep F M Stalmeier; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Herman van Dekken; Huug Obertop; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia.

Authors:  W J Blot; S S Devesa; R W Kneller; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  The role of surgery in the management of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Wu; Mitchell C Posner
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  The degree of segmental aneuploidy measured by total copy number abnormalities predicts survival and recurrence in superficial gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jon M Davison; Melissa Yee; J Michael Krill-Burger; Maureen A Lyons-Weiler; Lori A Kelly; Christin M Sciulli; Katie S Nason; James D Luketich; George K Michalopoulos; William A LaFramboise
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  SMAD4 is a predictive marker for 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J L Boulay; G Mild; A Lowy; J Reuter; M Lagrange; L Terracciano; U Laffer; R Herrmann; C Rochlitz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-09-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  15 in total

1.  Editorial on role of p53 in esophageal cancer from a meta-analysis of 16 studies by Fisher et al.

Authors:  Francesca Steccanella; Antonio Costanzo; Fausto Petrelli
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The revised American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition) improves prognostic stratification after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Haris Zahoor; James D Luketich; Benny Weksler; Daniel G Winger; Neil A Christie; Ryan M Levy; Michael K Gibson; Jon M Davison; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Loss of DPC4/SMAD4 expression in primary gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors is associated with cancer-related death after resection.

Authors:  Christina L Roland; Lee F Starker; Y Kang; Deyali Chatterjee; Jeannelyn Estrella; Asif Rashid; Matthew H Katz; Thomas A Aloia; Jeffrey E Lee; Arvind Dasari; James C Yao; Jason B Fleming
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Prognostic Roles of ZNF703 and SMAD4 Expression in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Cancer and Association with Nodal Metastasis.

Authors:  Asmaa Hussein Mohamed; Ola A Harb; Shereen El Shorbagy; Rawda Balata; Mohamed Farouk Amin; Osama Abd-Elaziz
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-15

5.  Perineural Invasion Is a Significant Indicator of High Malignant Degree and Poor Prognosis in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Liuyang Bai; Liangying Yan; Yaping Guo; Luyun He; Zhiyan Sun; Wenbo Cao; Jing Lu; Saijun Mo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  SMAD4 mutation correlates with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Qianqian Xue; Qiang Zheng; Yan Jin; Xuxia Shen; Mu Yang; Xiaoyan Zhou; Yuan Li
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.662

7.  Genomic aberrations in young and elderly  breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hatem A Azim; Bastien Nguyen; Sylvain Brohée; Gabriele Zoppoli; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Next-Generation Sequencing of 487 Esophageal Adenocarcinomas Reveals Independently Prognostic Genomic Driver Alterations and Pathways.

Authors:  Smita Sihag; Samuel C Nussenzweig; Henry S Walch; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Walid K Chatila; Sergio A De La Torre; Assem Patel; Yelena Y Janjigian; Steven Maron; Geoffrey Y Ku; Laura H Tang; Jaclyn Hechtman; Pari M Shah; Abraham J Wu; David R Jones; Daniela Molena; David B Solit; Nikolaus Schultz; Michael F Berger
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  An Algorithmic Immunohistochemical Approach to Define Tumor Type and Assign Site of Origin.

Authors:  Andrew M Bellizzi
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.571

10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Aafke Creemers; Eva A Ebbing; Thomas C Pelgrim; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Faridi S van Etten-Jamaludin; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Kausilia K Krishnadath; Sybren L Meijer; Maarten F Bijlsma; Martijn G H van Oijen; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.