OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate occupational exposures and menstrual cycle characteristics among nurses. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data collected in 2010-2012 from 6309 nurses aged 21-45 years, we investigated nurses' menstrual function in the Nurses' Health Study 3. We used multivariable regression modeling to analyze the associations between occupational exposures and prevalence of irregular cycles and long and short cycle lengths. RESULTS: The cohort reported cycle length as <21 (1.5%), 21-25 (15.6%), 26-31 (69.7%), and 32-50 (13.2%) days. In addition, 19% of participants reported irregular cycles. Working ≥41 hours/week was associated with a 16% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 4-29%] higher prevalence of irregular cycles and a higher prevalence of very short (<21-day) cycles [prevalence odds ratio (OR) 1.93, 95% CI 1.24-3.01] in adjusted models. Irregular menstrual cycles were more prevalent among women working nights only (32% higher; 95% CI 15-51%) or rotating nights (27% higher, 95% CI 10-47%), and was associated with the number of night shifts per month (P for trend <0.0001). Rotating night schedule was associated with long (32-50 day) cycles (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.61). Heavy lifting was associated with a higher prevalence of irregular cycles (34% higher), and the prevalence of cycles <21 days and 21-25 day cycles increased with increasing heavy lifting at work (P for trend <0.02 for each endpoint). CONCLUSION: Night work, long hours, and physically demanding work might relate to menstrual disturbances.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate occupational exposures and menstrual cycle characteristics among nurses. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data collected in 2010-2012 from 6309 nurses aged 21-45 years, we investigated nurses' menstrual function in the Nurses' Health Study 3. We used multivariable regression modeling to analyze the associations between occupational exposures and prevalence of irregular cycles and long and short cycle lengths. RESULTS: The cohort reported cycle length as <21 (1.5%), 21-25 (15.6%), 26-31 (69.7%), and 32-50 (13.2%) days. In addition, 19% of participants reported irregular cycles. Working ≥41 hours/week was associated with a 16% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 4-29%] higher prevalence of irregular cycles and a higher prevalence of very short (<21-day) cycles [prevalence odds ratio (OR) 1.93, 95% CI 1.24-3.01] in adjusted models. Irregular menstrual cycles were more prevalent among women working nights only (32% higher; 95% CI 15-51%) or rotating nights (27% higher, 95% CI 10-47%), and was associated with the number of night shifts per month (P for trend <0.0001). Rotating night schedule was associated with long (32-50 day) cycles (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.61). Heavy lifting was associated with a higher prevalence of irregular cycles (34% higher), and the prevalence of cycles <21 days and 21-25 day cycles increased with increasing heavy lifting at work (P for trend <0.02 for each endpoint). CONCLUSION: Night work, long hours, and physically demanding work might relate to menstrual disturbances.
Authors: Candice Y Johnson; Lauren J Tanz; Christina C Lawson; Penelope P Howards; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson; A Heather Eliassen; Eva S Schernhammer; Janet W Rich-Edwards Journal: Arch Environ Occup Health Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 1.663
Authors: Changzheng Yuan; Donna Spiegelman; Eric B Rimm; Bernard A Rosner; Meir J Stampfer; Junaidah B Barnett; Jorge E Chavarro; Amy F Subar; Laura K Sampson; Walter C Willett Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Changzheng Yuan; Donna Spiegelman; Eric B Rimm; Bernard A Rosner; Meir J Stampfer; Junaidah B Barnett; Jorge E Chavarro; Jennifer C Rood; Lisa J Harnack; Laura K Sampson; Walter C Willett Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Irene Souter; Paige L Williams; Jennifer B Ford; Russ Hauser; Jorge E Chavarro; Audrey J Gaskins Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Audrey J Gaskins; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Christina C Lawson; Eva S Schernhammer; Stacey A Missmer; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 4.402