Literature DB >> 25634444

External validation of the endometriosis fertility index (EFI) for predicting spontaneous pregnancy after surgery: further considerations on its validity.

Elisabetta Garavaglia1, Luca Pagliardini, Iacopo Tandoi, Cristina Sigismondi, Paola Viganò, Stefano Ferrari, Massimo Candiani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis has a limited predictive value for pregnancy after surgery. A tool for predicting spontaneous pregnancy or pregnancy following assisted reproduction technology (ART) represents a clinical need. This study aimed to (i) provide an external validation of the EFI score in predicting pregnancy in infertile Italian endometriosis women; (ii) evaluate the predictive value of EFI score on ART outcome for patients who previously attempted to spontaneously conceive after surgery.
METHODS: In 104 women with endometriosis, EFI score was calculated based on a prospective database data. Cumulative pregnancy rates curves were calculated using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) product limit estimate and log-rank test was used to evaluate differences between EFI groups. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for EFI as a predictor of ART outcome.
RESULTS: Differences in time to non-ART pregnancy for the six EFI groups were statistically significant (log-rank, p = 1.4 × 10(-4)). The area under the curve (AUC) for EFI as ART outcome predictor was 0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.89, p = 6.2 × 10(-3)), while the best cut-point for pregnancy was 5.5.
CONCLUSION: The EFI score is a reliable scoring system to predict non-ART and ART pregnancy outcome after surgery for endometriosis.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25634444     DOI: 10.1159/000366443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  6 in total

1.  What to choose and why to use - a critical review on the clinical relevance of rASRM, EFI and Enzian classifications of endometriosis.

Authors:  G Hudelist; L Valentin; E Saridogan; G Condous; M Malzoni; H Roman; D Jurkovic; J Keckstein
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-12

2.  Endometriosis Fertility Index for Predicting Pregnancy after Endometriosis Surgery.

Authors:  Xin Li; Cheng Zeng; Ying-Fang Zhou; Hui-Xia Yang; Jing Shang; Sai-Nan Zhu; Qing Xue
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems: a review on the road to a universally accepted endometriosis classification.

Authors:  Nathalie Vermeulen; Mauricio S Abrao; Jon I Einarsson; Andrew W Horne; Neil P Johnson; Ted T M Lee; Stacey Missmer; John Petrozza; Carla Tomassetti; Krina T Zondervan; Grigoris Grimbizis; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-10-22

4.  Analysis of recurrence factors associated with conservative surgery for ovarian-type endometriosis.

Authors:  Gu Huang; Xiang Fan; Pengfeng Zhu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-03

5.  Endometriosis classification, staging and reporting systems: a review on the road to a universally accepted endometriosis classification.

Authors:  N Vermeulen; M S Abrao; J I Einarsson; A W Horne; N P Johnson; T T M Lee; S Missmer; J Petrozza; C Tomassetti; K T Zondervan; G Grimbizis; R L De Wilde
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-12

6.  Analysis of factors related to fertility after endometriosis combined with infertility laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Yuehong Hui; Shaojie Zhao; Jinsong Gu; Chen Hang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.