Literature DB >> 25634428

A substitution method to improve completeness of events documentation in anesthesia records.

Antoine Lamer1,2,3, Julien De Jonckheere4, Romaric Marcilly4,5, Benoît Tavernier6, Benoît Vallet6,5, Mathieu Jeanne4,6, Régis Logier4,5.   

Abstract

AIMS are optimized to find and display data and curves about one specific intervention but is not retrospective analysis on a huge volume of interventions. Such a system present two main limitation; (1) the transactional database architecture, (2) the completeness of documentation. In order to solve the architectural problem, data warehouses were developed to propose architecture suitable for analysis. However, completeness of documentation stays unsolved. In this paper, we describe a method which allows determining of substitution rules in order to detect missing anesthesia events in an anesthesia record. Our method is based on the principle that missing event could be detected using a substitution one defined as the nearest documented event. As an example, we focused on the automatic detection of the start and the end of anesthesia procedure when these events were not documented by the clinicians. We applied our method on a set of records in order to evaluate; (1) the event detection accuracy, (2) the improvement of valid records. For the year 2010-2012, we obtained event detection with a precision of 0.00 (-2.22; 2.00) min for the start of anesthesia and 0.10 (0.00; 0.35) min for the end of anesthesia. On the other hand, we increased by 21.1% the data completeness (from 80.3 to 97.2% of the total database) for the start and the end of anesthesia events. This method seems to be efficient to replace missing "start and end of anesthesia" events. This method could also be used to replace other missing time events in this particular data warehouse as well as in other kind of data warehouses.

Keywords:  AIMS; Data completeness; Data warehouse; Substitution rule

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25634428     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9661-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  17 in total

1.  Development of a clinical data warehouse for hospital infection control.

Authors:  Mary F Wisniewski; Piotr Kieszkowski; Brandon M Zagorski; William E Trick; Michael Sommers; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Development of a clinical data warehouse from an intensive care clinical information system.

Authors:  Marleen de Mul; Peter Alons; Peter van der Velde; Ilse Konings; Jan Bakker; Jan Hazelzet
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Automated documentation error detection and notification improves anesthesia billing performance.

Authors:  Stephen F Spring; Warren S Sandberg; Shaji Anupama; John L Walsh; William D Driscoll; Douglas E Raines
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  The effects of an electronic medical record on the completeness of documentation in the anesthesia record.

Authors:  Junghwa Jang; Seung Hum Yu; Chun-Bae Kim; Youngkyu Moon; Sukil Kim
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Detection of intraoperative incidents by electronic scanning of computerized anesthesia records. Comparison with voluntary reporting.

Authors:  K V Sanborn; J Castro; M Kuroda; D M Thys
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  The anesthetic record: accuracy and completeness.

Authors:  J H Devitt; T Rapanos; M Kurrek; M M Cohen; M Shaw
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 7.  Health information systems - past, present, future.

Authors:  Reinhold Haux
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Real-time checking of electronic anesthesia records for documentation errors and automatically text messaging clinicians improves quality of documentation.

Authors:  Warren S Sandberg; Elisabeth H Sandberg; Andreas R Seim; Shaji Anupama; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Stephen F Spring; John L Walsh
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  The occurrence of intra-operative hypotension varies between hospitals: observational analysis of more than 147,000 anaesthesia.

Authors:  P Taffé; N Sicard; V Pittet; S Pichard; B Burnand
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.105

10.  The use of a clinical database in an anesthesia unit: focus on its limits.

Authors:  Grégoire Weil; Cyrus Motamed; Alexandre Eghiaian; Marie Laurence Guye; Jean Louis Bourgain
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.