Yun-Mi Song1, Joohon Sung2,3, Kayoung Lee4. 1. Department of Family Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea. 3. Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea. 4. Department of Family Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, 633-165 Gaegum-dong, Busan Jin-Gu, Busan, 614-735, South Korea. kayoung.fmlky@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To examine cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships, including genetic and environmental correlations, of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and obesity with kidney function. METHODS: Subjects were 3,437 Korean adults of the Healthy Twin Study for cross-sectional relationships and 1,881 participants for longitudinal relationships (follow-up interval 3.7 ± 1.4 years). Obesity (body mass index ≥ 25 vs. <25 kg/m(2)), MetS, and chronic kidney disease [CKD; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) using the modification of diet in renal disease study equation)] were categorized at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: The prevalence and incidence of chronic kidney disease were 2.5 and 3.3 %, respectively. Compared to individuals without obesity and MetS, prevalent CKD was associated with MetS regardless of weight status [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.19 for those with MetS but without obesity; AOR 4.63 for those with MetS and obesity]. Incident CKD was associated with obesity regardless of baseline metabolic status (AOR 2.03 for those with obesity but without MetS; AOR 2.85 for those with obesity and MetS). MetS at follow-up was associated with incident CKD regardless of baseline MetS (AOR 2.42-2.52). Sex-adjusted bivariate analyses show inverse environmental correlations of the number of MetS components and BMI at baseline, with eGFR at baseline and follow-up (ρ E, -0.26 to -0.42, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MetS predicts prevalent CKD regardless of obesity, and obesity predicts incident CKD regardless of baseline MetS. Incident CKD is also associated with MetS at follow-up regardless of baseline MetS. These associations appear to be explained by shared environmental factors.
BACKGROUND: To examine cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships, including genetic and environmental correlations, of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and obesity with kidney function. METHODS: Subjects were 3,437 Korean adults of the Healthy Twin Study for cross-sectional relationships and 1,881 participants for longitudinal relationships (follow-up interval 3.7 ± 1.4 years). Obesity (body mass index ≥ 25 vs. <25 kg/m(2)), MetS, and chronic kidney disease [CKD; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) using the modification of diet in renal disease study equation)] were categorized at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: The prevalence and incidence of chronic kidney disease were 2.5 and 3.3 %, respectively. Compared to individuals without obesity and MetS, prevalent CKD was associated with MetS regardless of weight status [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.19 for those with MetS but without obesity; AOR 4.63 for those with MetS and obesity]. Incident CKD was associated with obesity regardless of baseline metabolic status (AOR 2.03 for those with obesity but without MetS; AOR 2.85 for those with obesity and MetS). MetS at follow-up was associated with incident CKD regardless of baseline MetS (AOR 2.42-2.52). Sex-adjusted bivariate analyses show inverse environmental correlations of the number of MetS components and BMI at baseline, with eGFR at baseline and follow-up (ρ E, -0.26 to -0.42, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MetS predicts prevalent CKD regardless of obesity, and obesity predicts incident CKD regardless of baseline MetS. Incident CKD is also associated with MetS at follow-up regardless of baseline MetS. These associations appear to be explained by shared environmental factors.
Authors: Jean W MacCluer; Marina Scavini; Vallabh O Shah; Shelley A Cole; Sandra L Laston; V Saroja Voruganti; Susan S Paine; Alfred J Eaton; Anthony G Comuzzie; Francesca Tentori; Dorothy R Pathak; Arlene Bobelu; Jeanette Bobelu; Donica Ghahate; Mildred Waikaniwa; Philip G Zager Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2010-06-19 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Xiao Sun; Shu-Feng Lei; Fei-Yan Deng; Shan Wu; Christopher Papacian; James Hamilton; Robert R Recker; Hong-Wen Deng Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2006-07-28 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: George Thomas; Ashwini R Sehgal; Sangeeta R Kashyap; Titte R Srinivas; John P Kirwan; Sankar D Navaneethan Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: A G Comuzzie; D L Rainwater; J Blangero; M C Mahaney; J L VandeBerg; J W MacCluer Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: A S Levey; R Atkins; J Coresh; E P Cohen; A J Collins; K-U Eckardt; M E Nahas; B L Jaber; M Jadoul; A Levin; N R Powe; J Rossert; D C Wheeler; N Lameire; G Eknoyan Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2007-06-13 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Vincent L Mendy; Mario J Azevedo; Daniel F Sarpong; Sylvia E Rosas; Olugbemiga T Ekundayo; Jung Hye Sung; Azad R Bhuiyan; Brenda C Jenkins; Clifton Addison Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alex R Chang; Aditya Surapaneni; H Lester Kirchner; Amanda Young; Holly J Kramer; David J Carey; Lawrence J Appel; Morgan E Grams Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 5.002