| Literature DB >> 25634059 |
Guanmin Gao1, Zujiang Yu2, Jingya Yan2, Jingjing Li1, Shen Shen2, Bin Jia1, Kelei Guan3, Xiaojuan Gao2, Quancheng Kan3.
Abstract
Hepatic failure (HF) is caused by several factors, which induce liver cell damage and dysfunction. However, the specific mechanism of HF remains to be fully elucidated. The present study aimed to investigate the underlying cause of hepatocyte injury and liver dysfunction. Liver cells were isolated from healthy female Sprague‑Dawley rats, aged between 6 and 8 weeks, weighing ~230 g. The liver cells were cultured in RPMI‑1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. An MTT assay was used to examine the inhibitory rate of liver growth in each group. Flow cytometric analysis was performed to detect liver cells undergoing apoptosis. The protein expression levels of poly (ADP‑ribose) polymerase (PARP) and cytochrome c (Cyt C) were detected by western blotting. The level of calmodulin‑dependent kinase (CaMK) was assessed using an ELISA. The results indicated that the growth inhibitory rate of rat liver cells was significantly increased following treatment with increasing concentrations of NH4Cl. The results of flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that the apoptotic rate in the BAPTA‑acetoxymethyl ester group was significantly lower compared with the NH4Cl group (P<0.05). Treatment with NH4Cl increased the protein expression levels of PARP and Cyt C in the liver cells. The mRNA expression of CaMK decreased gradually following treatment with increasing concentrations of NH4Cl for 6, 12 and 24 h. The results suggested that hepatocyte injury and liver dysfunction may be caused by inducing apoptosis via the PARP and Cyt C pathways. Additionally, downregulation of CaMK may be associated with the apoptosis observed in hepatocyte injury.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25634059 PMCID: PMC4394961 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Med Rep ISSN: 1791-2997 Impact factor: 2.952
Growth inhibitory rate of different types of cells following treatment with NH4Cl for 24 h.
| NH4Cl concentration (mM) | Growth inhibitory rate (mean % ±standard deviation)
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rat liver | BCG-823 | 9706 | A549 | |
| 100 | 89.52±0.47a | 17.81±1.14b | 16.60±1.52b | 14.24±0.64b |
| 80 | 80.26±0.60a | 13.97±0.87b | 11.99±2.38b | 11.47±1.43b |
| 40 | 33.55±1.52a | 11.86±2.39b | 8.05±2.58b | 8.74±0.85b |
| 20 | 16.71±1.25a | 5.20±2.16b | 3.69±1.48b | 7.75±0.83b |
| 10 | 12.91±0.71a | 2.61±0.59b | 2.08±1.18b | 6.77±0.67b |
| 5 | 9.81±0.84a | 1.02±0.50b | 1.44±1.60b | 4.65±0.29b |
Two-way analysis of variance was used. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups (aP<0.01, compared with the untreated cells). A least significant difference test was used, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (bP<0.05, compared with the untreated cells).
Growth inhibitory rate (%) of different groups of rat liver cells following treatment with NH4Cl for 6 h.
| NH4Cl concentration (mM) | BAPTA-AM
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH4Cl | EGTA | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.001 | |
| 100 | 49.25±1.71 | 46.50±2.38 | 29.32±1.45a | 26.02±1.32a | 28.44±1.77a |
| 80 | 36.93±1.14 | 35.00±1.09 | 25.26±1.92a | 23.71±1.88a | 25.02±1.63a |
| 60 | 27.96±1.30 | 26.02±1.32 | 22.93±2.13b | 20.43±0.83a | 22.45±1.46b |
| 40 | 23.29±2.90 | 23.71±1.88 | 16.67±2.12b | 15.28±2.20b | 16.87±1.97b |
| 20 | 14.04±2.34 | 13.63±1.50 | 12.53±1.98 | 11.09±2.01 | 12.33±2.78 |
| 10 | 9.23±1.54 | 9.07±2.00 | 8.23±1.12 | 7.40±0.93 | 8.19±0.97 |
Two-way analysis of variance was used and statistically significant differences were observed between the BAPTA-AM groups Data are expressed as the mean percentage ±standard deviation. (aP<0.01 and bP<0.05, compared with untreated rat liver cells).
Figure 1Detection of apoptotic cells following 40 mM NH4Cl treatment for 6 h in the NH4Cl and BAPTA-AM groups. (A) NH4Cl group. (B) BAPTA-AM group. (C) Quantification of flow cytometry data. Data are expressed as the mean ±standard deviation. PI, propidium iodide; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate.
Figure 2Protein expression of PARP following treatment with different concentrations of NH4Cl in rat liver cells with or without pretreatment with EGTA or BAPTA-AM. (A) Western blot analysis for the protein expression of PRAP. (B) Statistical analysis of the expression of PRAP (*P<0.05, compared with the former concentration). PARP, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase.
Figure 3Detection of the expression of Cyt C following treatment with different concentrations of NH4Cl in rat liver cells with or without pretreatment with EGTA or BAPTA-AM by western blot analysis. (A) Western blot analysis of the expression of Cyt C. (B) Statistical analysis of the expression of Cyt C (*P<0.05, compared with the former concentration). Cyt C, cytochrome c; PARP, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase.
Figure 4Differences in the mRNA expression following treatment with NH4Cl for 6, 12 and 24 h. No statistically significant differences were observed in the expression of CaM at 6 h (P=0.0952), 12 h (P=0.0658) or 24 h (P=0.1058) using an independent t-test. A statistically significant difference was observed between the expression levels of CaMK at all time points (*P<0.05). (A) Treatment for 6 h. (B) Treatment for 12 h. (C) Treatment for 24 h. (D) Difference in the mRNA expression levels following treatment with NH4Cl for different durations. CaM, calmodulin; CaMK, calmodulin-dependent kinase.