Literature DB >> 25633999

Factors influencing sex differences in poststroke functional outcome.

Lynda D Lisabeth1, Mathew J Reeves2, Jonggyu Baek2, Lesli E Skolarus2, Devin L Brown2, Darin B Zahuranec2, Melinda A Smith2, Lewis B Morgenstern2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Our objective was to identify factors that contribute to or modify the sex difference in poststroke functional outcome.
METHODS: Ischemic strokes (n=439) were identified from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) Project (2008-2011). Data were ascertained from interviews (baseline and 90 days post stroke) and medical records. Functional outcome was measured as an average of 22 activities of daily living (ADL)/instrumental ADL items (range, 1-4; higher scores worse function). Tobit regression was used to estimate sex differences and to identify confounding and modifying factors.
RESULTS: Fifty-one percent were women. Median age was 71 (interquartile range, 59-80) years in women and 64 (interquartile range, 56-77) years in men. Median ADL/instrumental ADL score at 90 days was 2.7 (interquartile range, 1.8-3.6) in women and 2.0 (interquartile range, 1.3-3.1) in men (P<0.01); this difference remained after age-adjustment (P<0.001). Factors contributing to higher ADL/instrumental ADL scores in women included prestroke function, marital status, prestroke cognition, nursing home residence, stroke severity, history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, and body mass index; prestroke function was the largest contributor. Stroke severity modified the sex difference in outcome such that differences were apparent for mild to moderate but not severe strokes. After adjustment, women still had significantly worse functional outcome than men.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings yield insight into possible strategies and subgroups to target to reduce the sex disparity in stroke outcome; demographics and prestroke and clinical factors explained only 41% of the sex difference in stroke outcome highlighting the need for future research to identify modifiable factors that contribute to sex differences.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  outcomes research; sex; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25633999      PMCID: PMC4342324          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  8 in total

1.  Family support for stroke: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J Mant; J Carter; D T Wade; S Winner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-09-02       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Aging society and gerontechnology: a solution for an independent living?

Authors:  A Piau; E Campo; P Rumeau; B Vellas; F Nourhashémi
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  The Families In Recovery From Stroke Trial (FIRST): primary study results.

Authors:  Thomas A Glass; Lisa F Berkman; Elizabeth F Hiltunen; Karen Furie; M Maria Glymour; Martha E Fay; James Ware
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the NIH Stroke Scale.

Authors:  L S Williams; E Y Yilmaz; A M Lopez-Yunez
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Persistent ischemic stroke disparities despite declining incidence in Mexican Americans.

Authors:  Lewis B Morgenstern; Melinda A Smith; Brisa N Sánchez; Devin L Brown; Darin B Zahuranec; Nelda Garcia; Kevin A Kerber; Lesli E Skolarus; William J Meurer; James F Burke; Eric E Adelman; Jonggyu Baek; Lynda D Lisabeth
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Impact of patient's weight on stroke rehabilitation results.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; Biana Rodrigues; Diana Gurvich; Ziva Israelov; Elina Spivak
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 7.  Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes.

Authors:  Mathew J Reeves; Cheryl D Bushnell; George Howard; Julia Warner Gargano; Pamela W Duncan; Gwen Lynch; Arya Khatiwoda; Lynda Lisabeth
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  Social isolation and outcomes post stroke.

Authors:  B Boden-Albala; E Litwak; M S V Elkind; T Rundek; R L Sacco
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 9.910

  8 in total
  26 in total

1.  The Women Independently Living Alone with a Medical Alert Device (WILMA) trial.

Authors:  Lewis B Morgenstern; Eric E Adelman; Rebecca Hughes; Jeffrey J Wing; Lynda D Lisabeth
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 6.829

2.  Population-based study of home-time by stroke type and correlation with modified Rankin score.

Authors:  Amy Y X Yu; Edwin Rogers; Meng Wang; Tolulope T Sajobi; Shelagh B Coutts; Bijoy K Menon; Michael D Hill; Eric E Smith
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Sex Differences in Outcome After Endovascular Stroke Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Sunil A Sheth; Songmi Lee; Steven J Warach; Jan Gralla; Reza Jahan; Mayank Goyal; Raul G Nogueira; Osama O Zaidat; Vitor M Pereira; Adnan Siddiqui; Helmi Lutsep; David S Liebeskind; Louise D McCullough; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Sex Disparities in Ischemic Stroke Care: FL-PR CReSD Study (Florida-Puerto Rico Collaboration to Reduce Stroke Disparities).

Authors:  Negar Asdaghi; Jose G Romano; Kefeng Wang; Maria A Ciliberti-Vargas; Sebastian Koch; Hannah Gardener; Chuanhui Dong; David Z Rose; Salina P Waddy; Mary Robichaux; Enid J Garcia; Juan A Gonzalez-Sanchez; W Scott Burgin; Ralph L Sacco; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Sex differences in stroke: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Cheryl D Bushnell; Seemant Chaturvedi; Kathy R Gage; Paco S Herson; Patricia D Hurn; Monik C Jiménez; Steven J Kittner; Tracy E Madsen; Louise D McCullough; Mollie McDermott; Mathew J Reeves; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  A Population-Based Study of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Survivors' Outcomes.

Authors:  Julius Griauzde; Lynda D Lisabeth; Chengwei Li; Brisa N Sanchez; Erin Case; Nelda M Garcia; Lewis B Morgenstern; Darin B Zahuranec
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  Ethnic Differences in Poststroke Quality of Life in the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) Project.

Authors:  Sarah L Reeves; Devin L Brown; Jonggyu Baek; Jeffrey J Wing; Lewis B Morgenstern; Lynda D Lisabeth
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Gender and Time to Arrival among Ischemic Stroke Patients in the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study.

Authors:  Tracy E Madsen; Heidi Sucharew; Brian Katz; Kathleen A Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Brett M Kissela; Matthew L Flaherty; Daniel Woo; Pooja Khatri; Simona Ferioli; Jason Mackey; Sharyl Martini; Felipe De Los Rios La Rosa; Dawn Kleindorfer
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Sex differences in sleep-disordered breathing after stroke: results from the BASIC project.

Authors:  Mollie McDermott; Devin L Brown; Chengwei Li; Nelda M Garcia; Erin Case; Ronald D Chervin; Lewis B Morgenstern; Lynda D Lisabeth
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 10.  The Importance of Considering Sex Differences in Translational Stroke Research.

Authors:  Hilda Ahnstedt; Louise D McCullough; Marilyn J Cipolla
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.829

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.