Literature DB >> 25633646

Visual number beats abstract numerical magnitude: format-dependent representation of Arabic digits and dot patterns in human parietal cortex.

Jessica Bulthé1, Bert De Smedt1, Hans P Op de Beeck1.   

Abstract

In numerical cognition, there is a well-known but contested hypothesis that proposes an abstract representation of numerical magnitude in human intraparietal sulcus (IPS). On the other hand, researchers of object cognition have suggested another hypothesis for brain activity in IPS during the processing of number, namely that this activity simply correlates with the number of visual objects or units that are perceived. We contrasted these two accounts by analyzing multivoxel activity patterns elicited by dot patterns and Arabic digits of different magnitudes while participants were explicitly processing the represented numerical magnitude. The activity pattern elicited by the digit "8" was more similar to the activity pattern elicited by one dot (with which the digit shares the number of visual units but not the magnitude) compared to the activity pattern elicited by eight dots, with which the digit shares the represented abstract numerical magnitude. A multivoxel pattern classifier trained to differentiate one dot from eight dots classified all Arabic digits in the one-dot pattern category, irrespective of the numerical magnitude symbolized by the digit. These results were consistently obtained for different digits in IPS, its subregions, and many other brain regions. As predicted from object cognition theories, the number of presented visual units forms the link between the parietal activation elicited by symbolic and nonsymbolic numbers. The current study is difficult to reconcile with the hypothesis that parietal activation elicited by numbers would reflect a format-independent representation of number.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25633646     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

Review 1.  The neuronal code for number.

Authors:  Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Numerical encoding in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Nicholas K DeWind; Joonkoo Park; Marty G Woldorff; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Shared Numerosity Representations Across Formats and Tasks Revealed with 7 Tesla fMRI: Decoding, Generalization, and Individual Differences in Behavior.

Authors:  Eric D Wilkey; Benjamin N Conrad; Darren J Yeo; Gavin R Price
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-07-30

4.  Modality-independent representations of small quantities based on brain activation patterns.

Authors:  Saudamini Roy Damarla; Vladimir L Cherkassky; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Numerals do not need numerosities: robust evidence for distinct numerical representations for symbolic and non-symbolic numbers.

Authors:  Mila Marinova; Delphine Sasanguie; Bert Reynvoet
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-01-18

6.  Neural representational similarity between symbolic and non-symbolic quantities predicts arithmetic skills in childhood but not adolescence.

Authors:  Flora Schwartz; Yuan Zhang; Hyesang Chang; Shelby Karraker; Julia Boram Kang; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2021-06-01

Review 7.  Functional definitions of parietal areas in human and non-human primates.

Authors:  Guy A Orban
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The Source of the Symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects.

Authors:  Attila Krajcsi; Gábor Lengyel; Petia Kojouharova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-21

9.  Processing symbolic magnitude information conveyed by number words and by scalar adjectives.

Authors:  Arnold R Kochari; Herbert Schriefers
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Stereoscopically Observing Manipulative Actions.

Authors:  S Ferri; K Pauwels; G Rizzolatti; G A Orban
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.