Literature DB >> 25633227

Substantial Goodness and Nascent Human Life.

Shawn Floyd1.   

Abstract

Many believe that moral value is--at least to some extent--dependent on the developmental states necessary for supporting rational activity. My paper rejects this view, but does not aim simply to register objections to it. Rather, my essay aims to answer the following question: if a human being's developmental state and occurrent capacities do not bequeath moral standing, what does? The question is intended to prompt careful consideration of what makes human beings objects of moral value, dignity, or (to employ my preferred term) goodness. Not only do I think we can answer this question, I think we can show that nascent human life possesses goodness of precisely this sort. I appeal to Aquinas's metaethics to establish the conclusion that the goodness of a human being--even if that being is an embryo or fetus--resides at the substratum of her existence. If she possesses goodness, it is because human existence is good.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25633227     DOI: 10.1007/s10730-015-9265-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN: 0956-2737


  7 in total

1.  Reflections on the moral status of the pre-embryo.

Authors:  Thomas A Shannon; Allan B Wolter
Journal:  Theol Stud       Date:  1990-12

Review 2.  A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject.

Authors:  K E Himma
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Rational souls and the beginning of life (a reply to Robert Pasnau).

Authors:  John Haldane; Patrick Lee
Journal:  Philosophy       Date:  2003-10

4.  After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?

Authors:  Alberto Giubilini; Francesca Minerva
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 5.  Of souls, selves, and cerebrums: a reply to Himma.

Authors:  F J Beckwith
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  The beginning of personhood: a Thomistic biological analysis.

Authors:  J T Eberl
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.898

7.  Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva.

Authors:  Francis J Beckwith
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.903

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.