Literature DB >> 25633040

A strategy for tissue self-organization that is robust to cellular heterogeneity and plasticity.

Alec E Cerchiari1, James C Garbe2, Noel Y Jee3, Michael E Todhunter3, Kyle E Broaders3, Donna M Peehl4, Tejal A Desai5, Mark A LaBarge6, Matthew Thomson7, Zev J Gartner8.   

Abstract

Developing tissues contain motile populations of cells that can self-organize into spatially ordered tissues based on differences in their interfacial surface energies. However, it is unclear how self-organization by this mechanism remains robust when interfacial energies become heterogeneous in either time or space. The ducts and acini of the human mammary gland are prototypical heterogeneous and dynamic tissues comprising two concentrically arranged cell types. To investigate the consequences of cellular heterogeneity and plasticity on cell positioning in the mammary gland, we reconstituted its self-organization from aggregates of primary cells in vitro. We find that self-organization is dominated by the interfacial energy of the tissue-ECM boundary, rather than by differential homo- and heterotypic energies of cell-cell interaction. Surprisingly, interactions with the tissue-ECM boundary are binary, in that only one cell type interacts appreciably with the boundary. Using mathematical modeling and cell-type-specific knockdown of key regulators of cell-cell cohesion, we show that this strategy of self-organization is robust to severe perturbations affecting cell-cell contact formation. We also find that this mechanism of self-organization is conserved in the human prostate. Therefore, a binary interfacial interaction with the tissue boundary provides a flexible and generalizable strategy for forming and maintaining the structure of two-component tissues that exhibit abundant heterogeneity and plasticity. Our model also predicts that mutations affecting binary cell-ECM interactions are catastrophic and could contribute to loss of tissue architecture in diseases such as breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell sorting; differential adhesion; heterogeneity; mammary; prostate

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25633040      PMCID: PMC4343104          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1410776112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  Cellular heterogeneity: do differences make a difference?

Authors:  Steven J Altschuler; Lani F Wu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Defining the cellular precursors to human breast cancer.

Authors:  Patricia J Keller; Lisa M Arendt; Adam Skibinski; Tanya Logvinenko; Ina Klebba; Shumin Dong; Avi E Smith; Aleix Prat; Charles M Perou; Hannah Gilmore; Stuart Schnitt; Stephen P Naber; Jonathan A Garlick; Charlotte Kuperwasser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Accumulation of multipotent progenitors with a basal differentiation bias during aging of human mammary epithelia.

Authors:  James C Garbe; Francois Pepin; Fanny A Pelissier; Klara Sputova; Agla J Fridriksdottir; Diana E Guo; Rene Villadsen; Morag Park; Ole W Petersen; Alexander D Borowsky; Martha R Stampfer; Mark A Labarge
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  p120-catenin is essential for terminal end bud function and mammary morphogenesis.

Authors:  Sarah J Kurley; Brian Bierie; Robert H Carnahan; Nichole A Lobdell; Michael A Davis; Ilse Hofmann; Harold L Moses; William J Muller; Albert B Reynolds
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  Self-organization is a dynamic and lineage-intrinsic property of mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Lea Chanson; Douglas Brownfield; James C Garbe; Irene Kuhn; Martha R Stampfer; Mina J Bissell; Mark A LaBarge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Chemically programmed cell adhesion with membrane-anchored oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Nicholas S Selden; Michael E Todhunter; Noel Y Jee; Jennifer S Liu; Kyle E Broaders; Zev J Gartner
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Programmed cell-to-cell variability in Ras activity triggers emergent behaviors during mammary epithelial morphogenesis.

Authors:  Jennifer S Liu; Justin T Farlow; Amanda K Paulson; Mark A Labarge; Zev J Gartner
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  A tissue reconstitution model to study cancer cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors in mammary tumourigenesis.

Authors:  Bastiaan Evers; Ewoud N Speksnijder; Eva Schut; Metamia Ciampricotti; Matthew J Smalley; Patrick W B Derksen; Jos Jonkers; Karin E de Visser
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  Adhesion functions in cell sorting by mechanically coupling the cortices of adhering cells.

Authors:  Jean-Léon Maître; Hélène Berthoumieux; Simon Frederik Gabriel Krens; Guillaume Salbreux; Frank Jülicher; Ewa Paluch; Carl-Philipp Heisenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Mapping the cellular and molecular heterogeneity of normal and malignant breast tissues and cultured cell lines.

Authors:  Patrica J Keller; Amy F Lin; Lisa M Arendt; Ina Klebba; Ainsely D Jones; Jenny A Rudnick; Theresa A DiMeo; Hannah Gilmore; Douglas M Jefferson; Roger A Graham; Stephen P Naber; Stuart Schnitt; Charlotte Kuperwasser
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  42 in total

1.  Mammary epithelial tubes elongate through MAPK-dependent coordination of cell migration.

Authors:  Robert J Huebner; Neil M Neumann; Andrew J Ewald
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 2.  Building Complex Life Through Self-Organization.

Authors:  Mireille M J P E Sthijns; Vanessa L S LaPointe; Clemens A van Blitterswijk
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  A reproducible scaffold-free 3D organoid model to study neoplastic progression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sabra I Djomehri; Boris Burman; Maria E Gonzalez; Shuichi Takayama; Celina G Kleer
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.782

Review 4.  Dissecting the stem cell niche with organoid models: an engineering-based approach.

Authors:  Lyndsay M Murrow; Robert J Weber; Zev J Gartner
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 5.  3D culture models of tissues under tension.

Authors:  Jeroen Eyckmans; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 6.  Towards personalized computational oncology: from spatial models of tumour spheroids, to organoids, to tissues.

Authors:  Aleksandra Karolak; Dmitry A Markov; Lisa J McCawley; Katarzyna A Rejniak
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Physical Mechanisms Driving Cell Sorting in Hydra.

Authors:  Olivier Cochet-Escartin; Tiffany T Locke; Winnie H Shi; Robert E Steele; Eva-Maria S Collins
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Living tissues are more than cell clusters: The extracellular matrix as a driving force in morphogenesis.

Authors:  Marta Linde-Medina; Ralph Marcucio
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.667

9.  Polyurethane Microgel Based Microtissue: Interface-Guided Assembly and Spreading.

Authors:  Michael J Hill; Debanjan Sarkar
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 10.  Mechanics of tissue compaction.

Authors:  Hervé Turlier; Jean-Léon Maître
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 7.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.