Literature DB >> 25632839

Paid expenditures and productivity costs associated with permanent disability pensions in patients with spinal disorders: Nationwide Finnish Register-based Study, 1990-2010.

Tom Asklöf1, Janne Martikainen2, Hannu Kautiainen3,4, Maija Haanpää5, Ilkka Kiviranta6, Timo Pohjolainen7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to present the paid expenditures and productivity costs of disability pensions (DP) due to spinal disorders (SD) in Finland during 1990-2010.
METHODS: This study is a register-based national study. All new cases aged 20-64 that were granted a DP due to SD were identified from the nationwide register maintained by the Finnish Centre of Pensions. The data included sex, age group, year of the DP decision, main cause of incapacity (diagnosis) leading to permanent DP and yearly paid expenditures for DPs. Annual productivity costs were estimated based on labour force participation rate and the employment rate adjusted gross domestic product.
RESULTS: A total of 39,107 individuals (18,072 females, 21,035 males) received DPs during the study period. SDs generated 9,372 million euros extra cost during this period due to DP (females 3.5 billion, males 5.9 billion). The total DP expenditures paid increased during the first half of 1990s but decreased during the second half of 1990s (-44.8 %). For degenerative SD cases, the DP expenditure was 5.1 billion €, disc disease 3.5 billion € and for other SDs 0.7 billion €. Males, compared to females, were expected to have a rate 1.22 times greater costs due to DPs. The estimated total annual productivity costs due to SDs have been over six times higher than expenditures paid for DPs per year. The costs of DPs are different compared to occurrence rates due to salary and early retirement age differences between genders.
CONCLUSION: Despite a significant decrease in DP-associated expenditures due to SDs after 1993, the annual expenditures have stayed on a high level in Finland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disability pension; Health care expenditures; Productivity costs; Register-based study; Spinal disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25632839     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3775-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  The economic burden of back pain in the UK.

Authors:  N Maniadakis; A Gray
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Five questions predicted long-term, severe, back-related functional limitations: evidence from three large prospective studies.

Authors:  Clermont E Dionne; Natalie Le Sage; Renée-Louise Franche; Michel Dorval; Claire Bombardier; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Disability pensions due to spinal disorders: nationwide Finnish register-based study, 1990-2010.

Authors:  Tom Asklöf; Hannu Kautiainen; Salme Järvenpää; Maija Haanpää; Ilkka Kiviranta; Timo Pohjolainen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  How to estimate productivity costs in economic evaluations.

Authors:  Marieke Krol; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  The costs of rheumatoid arthritis: an international long-term view.

Authors:  K M Pugner; D I Scott; J W Holmes; K Hieke
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Early rheumatoid arthritis 6 years after diagnosis is still associated with high direct costs and increasing loss of productivity: the Swedish TIRA project.

Authors:  E Hallert; M Husberg; A Kalkan; T Skogh; L Bernfort
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Predictive factors for disability pension--an 11-year follow up of young persons on sick leave due to neck, shoulder, or back diagnoses.

Authors:  K Borg; G Hensing; K Alexanderson
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Judith A Turner; Bryan A Comstock; William Hollingworth; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Costs of rheumatoid arthritis in Germany: a micro-costing approach based on healthcare payer's data sources.

Authors:  J Ruof; J L Hülsemann; T Mittendorf; S Handelmann; J M von der Schulenburg; H Zeidler; S Merkesdal
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Prediction of sickness absenteeism, disability pension and sickness presenteeism among employees with back pain.

Authors:  Gunnar Bergström; Jan Hagberg; Hillevi Busch; Irene Jensen; Christina Björklund
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Which Characteristics are Associated with the Timing of the First Healthcare Consultation, and Does the Time to Care Influence the Duration of Compensation for Occupational Back Pain?

Authors:  Marc-André Blanchette; Michèle Rivard; Clermont E Dionne; Ivan Steenstra; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-09

Review 2.  Effectiveness and Economic Evaluation of Chiropractic Care for the Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Pragmatic Studies.

Authors:  Marc-André Blanchette; Mette Jensen Stochkendahl; Roxane Borges Da Silva; Jill Boruff; Pamela Harrison; André Bussières
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  NTG-101: A Novel Molecular Therapy that Halts the Progression of Degenerative Disc Disease.

Authors:  Ajay Matta; Muhammad Zia Karim; Hoda Gerami; Peter Jun; Martha Funabashi; Greg Kawchuk; Alyssa Goldstein; Warren Foltz; Marshall Sussman; Bjorn C Eek; W Mark Erwin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.