| Literature DB >> 25632310 |
Ana Rafaela de Souza Timoteo1, Betina Menezes Albuquerque2, Patricia Cristina Pascoto Moura3, Carlos Cesar de Oliveira Ramos4, Lucymara Fassarela Agnez-Lima1, Tom Walsh5, Mary-Claire King5, Tirzah Braz Petta Lajus3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) is an uncommon disease that has been the focus of limited research. It is estimated that approximately 10% of men with breast cancer have a genetic predisposition, with BRCA2 being the most prevalent genetic mutation. Here we describe the case of MBC in a 64-year-old man who presented on physical examination a nodule in his left breast and declared to have an extensive family history of cancer. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: BRCA2 mutation; Large genomic deletion; Male Breast Cancer (MBC); Next-generation sequencing
Year: 2015 PMID: 25632310 PMCID: PMC4308828 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-014-0022-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hered Cancer Clin Pract ISSN: 1731-2302 Impact factor: 2.857
Figure 1Patient pedigree. II.3 is the proband (indicated by an arrow). The figure shows a family history of cancer of 2 generations. Father dead of prostate cancer (I.1). Mother and sisters dead of breast cancer (I.2, II.6, II.7, II.8, II.10, II.11, II.12, respectively) and four brothers dead of unknown cancer (II.1, 2, 4, 5). Two daughters from first marriage also have been diagnosed with breast cancer (III.1 and III.2). The age of diagnostic are indicated (Dx).
Figure 2Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of paraffin-embedded tumour biopsy. The diagnosis was invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with histological grade III and nuclear grade 3. Magnifications A) 100X B) 200x and C) 400X.
Figure 3Proband’s bone scintigraphy realized on December, 2 2009 showing focus of metastasis at T9, L1, ischium and acetabulum.
Figure 4Mutation effect at transcript level. Agarose gel (1,5%) showing no amplification of proband’s samples using a forward primer in exon 13 and a reverse primer in exon 15 of BRCA2. Total cDNA from two independent RNA extractions from MRC5-V1 cells was used as a positive control for fragment amplification. A total of 70 ng from cDNA was used in each reaction. The length of the fragment expected is 530 bp.