Literature DB >> 25632133

Dynamic modulation of the action observation network by movement familiarity.

Tom Gardner1, Nia Goulden1, Emily S Cross2.   

Abstract

When watching another person's actions, a network of sensorimotor brain regions, collectively termed the action observation network (AON), is engaged. Previous research suggests that the AON is more responsive when watching familiar compared with unfamiliar actions. However, most research into AON function is premised on comparisons of AON engagement during different types of task using univariate, magnitude-based approaches. To better understand the relationship between action familiarity and AON engagement, here we examine how observed movement familiarity modulates AON activity in humans using dynamic causal modeling, a type of effective connectivity analysis. Twenty-one subjects underwent fMRI scanning while viewing whole-body dance movements that varied in terms of their familiarity. Participants' task was to either predict the next posture the dancer's body would assume or to respond to a non-action-related attentional control question. To assess individuals' familiarity with each movement, participants rated each video on a measure of visual familiarity after being scanned. Parametric analyses showed more activity in left middle temporal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, and inferior frontal gyrus as videos were rated as increasingly familiar. These clusters of activity formed the regions of interest for dynamic causal modeling analyses, which revealed attenuation of effective connectivity bidirectionally between parietal and temporal AON nodes when participants observed videos they rated as increasingly familiar. As such, the findings provide partial support for a predictive coding model of the AON, as well as illuminate how action familiarity manipulations can be used to explore simulation-based accounts of action understanding.
Copyright © 2015 Gardner et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action observation network; action perception; dynamic causal modeling; fMRI; parietal; premotor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25632133      PMCID: PMC4308602          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2942-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

1.  Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Giovanni Buccino; Fausta Lui; Nicola Canessa; Ilaria Patteri; Giovanna Lagravinese; Francesca Benuzzi; Carlo A Porro; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action.

Authors:  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Chris Frith
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Embodied cognition and the simulation of action to understand others.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Marta Maieron; Alessio Avenanti; Emmanuele Tidoni; Franco Fabbro; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The influence of visual training on predicting complex action sequences.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; Waltraud Stadler; Jim Parkinson; Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; Roman Liepelt; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Jim Parkinson; Richard Ramsey; Waltraud Stadler; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain.

Authors:  Svenja Caspers; Karl Zilles; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Comparing families of dynamic causal models.

Authors:  Will D Penny; Klaas E Stephan; Jean Daunizeau; Maria J Rosa; Karl J Friston; Thomas M Schofield; Alex P Leff
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Relationship between activity in human primary motor cortex during action observation and the mirror neuron system.

Authors:  James M Kilner; Jennifer L Marchant; Chris D Frith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  Affective and cooperative social interactions modulate effective connectivity within and between the mirror and mentalizing systems.

Authors:  Maria Arioli; Daniela Perani; Stefano Cappa; Alice Mado Proverbio; Alberto Zani; Andrea Falini; Nicola Canessa
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Rethinking actions: implementation and association.

Authors:  Lorna C Quandt; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-09-09

3.  Neural processing of social interaction: Coordinate-based meta-analytic evidence from human neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Maria Arioli; Nicola Canessa
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Cerebellar Damage Affects Contextual Priors for Action Prediction in Patients with Childhood Brain Tumor.

Authors:  Niccolò Butti; Claudia Corti; Alessandra Finisguerra; Alessandra Bardoni; Renato Borgatti; Geraldina Poggi; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Constructing Visual Perception of Body Movement with the Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Guido Orgs; Anna Dovern; Nobuhiro Hagura; Patrick Haggard; Gereon R Fink; Peter H Weiss
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Steady-state and dynamic network modes for perceptual expectation.

Authors:  Uk-Su Choi; Yul-Wan Sung; Seiji Ogawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Reduced Mu Power in Response to Unusual Actions Is Context-Dependent in 1-Year-Olds.

Authors:  Miriam Langeloh; David Buttelmann; Daniel Matthes; Susanne Grassmann; Sabina Pauen; Stefanie Hoehl
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-30

8.  Unravelling the contributions of motor experience and conceptual knowledge in action perception: A training study.

Authors:  S A Gerson; M Meyer; S Hunnius; H Bekkering
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Viewing ambiguous social interactions increases functional connectivity between frontal and temporal nodes of the social brain.

Authors:  Matthew Ainsworth; Jérôme Sallet; Olivier Joly; Diana Kyriazis; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; John Duncan; Urs Schüffelgen; Matthew Fs Rushworth; Andrew H Bell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The shaping of social perception by stimulus and knowledge cues to human animacy.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; Richard Ramsey; Roman Liepelt; Wolfgang Prinz; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.