Literature DB >> 25631462

What is the best technique in parenchymal transection in laparoscopic liver resection? Comprehensive review for the clinical question on the 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection.

Yuichiro Otsuka1, Hironori Kaneko, Sean P Cleary, Joseph F Buell, Xiujun Cai, Go Wakabayashi.   

Abstract

The continuing evolution of technique and devices used in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has allowed successful application of this minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of liver disease. However, the type of instruments by energy sources and technique used vary among each institution. We reviewed the literature to seek the best technique for parenchymal transection, which was proposed as one of the important clinical question in the 2nd International Consensus Conference on LLR held on October 2014. While publications have described transection techniques used in LLR from 1991 to June 2014, it is difficult to specify the best technique and device for laparoscopic hepatic parenchymal transection, owing to a lack of randomized trials with only a small number of comparative studies. However, it is clear that instruments should be used in combination with others based on their functions and the depth of liver resection. Most authors have reported using staplers to secure and divide major vessels. Preparation for prevention of unexpected hemorrhaging particularly in liver cirrhosis, the Pringle's maneuver and prompt technique for hemostasis should be performed. We conclude that hepatobiliary surgeons should select techniques based on their familiarity with a concrete understanding of instruments and individualize to the procedure of LLR.
© 2015 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energy device; Laparoscopy; Liver surgery; Stapling device; Technique; Transection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25631462     DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  23 in total

1.  The Italian Consensus on minimally invasive simultaneous resections for synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer: A Delphi methodology.

Authors:  Aldo Rocca; Federica Cipriani; Paolo Delrio; Fulvio Calise; Luca Aldrighetti; Giulio Belli; Stefano Berti; Ugo Boggi; Vincenzo Bottino; Umberto Cillo; Matteo Cescon; Matteo Cimino; Francesco Corcione; Luciano De Carlis; Maurizio Degiuli; Paolo De Paolis; Agostino Maria De Rose; Domenico D'Ugo; Fabrizio Di Benedetto; Ugo Elmore; Giorgio Ercolani; Giuseppe M Ettorre; Alessandro Ferrero; Marco Filauro; Felice Giuliante; Salvatore Gruttadauria; Alfredo Guglielmi; Francesco Izzo; Elio Jovine; Andrea Laurenzi; Francesco Marchegiani; Pierluigi Marini; Marco Massani; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Michela Mineccia; Francesco Minni; Andrea Muratore; Simone Nicosia; Riccardo Pellicci; Riccardo Rosati; Nadia Russolillo; Antonino Spinelli; Gaya Spolverato; Guido Torzilli; Giovanni Vennarecci; Luca Viganò; Leonardo Vincenti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-06-05

2.  From Louisville to Morioka: where is now MILS?

Authors:  Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-07-08

Review 3.  Topical hemostasis in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Vecchio; R Catalano; F Basile; C Spataro; M Caputo; E Intagliata
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Laparoscopic liver resection: a review of current indications and surgical techniques.

Authors:  Chenyang Jia; Hongyu Li; Ningyuan Wen; Junhua Chen; Yonggang Wei; Bo Li
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 5.  [Technical aspects of laparoscopic liver surgery : Transfer from open to laparoscopic liver surgery].

Authors:  S Heinrich; J Mittler; V Tripke; H Lang
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection?

Authors:  Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 7.  Setting up a robotic hepatectomy program: a Western-European experience and perspective.

Authors:  Carolijn L Nota; Inne H Borel Rinkes; Jeroen Hagendoorn
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.293

8.  An ex vivo liver training model continuously perfused to simulate bleeding for suture skills involved in laparoscopic liver resection: development and validity.

Authors:  Jujiao Xiao; Zhonglin Cui; Maoqing Fu; Xiangxue Kong; Lei Tang; Zhanglin Wang; Fuyu You; Qingfeng Du; Jianyi Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis in a single institution.

Authors:  Takeshi Takahara; Go Wakabayashi; Hiroyuki Nitta; Yasushi Hasegawa; Hirokatsu Katagiri; Daiki Takeda; Kenji Makabe; Akira Sasaki
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 10.  Application of stapling devices in liver surgery: Current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Dian-Bo Yao; Shuo-Dong Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.