AIMS: Isolation of Salmonella Typhi from blood culture is the standard diagnostic for confirming typhoid fever but it is unavailable in many developing countries. We previously described a Microwave Accelerated Metal Enhanced Fluorescence (MAMEF)-based assay to detect Salmonella in medium. Attempts to detect Salmonella in blood were unsuccessful, presumably due to the interference of erythrocytes. The objective of this study was to evaluate various blood treatment methods that could be used prior to PCR, real-time PCR or MAMEF to increase sensitivity of detection of Salmonella. METHODS AND RESULTS: We tested ammonium chloride and erythrocyte lysis buffer, water, Lymphocyte Separation Medium, BD Vacutainer(®) CPT(™) Tubes and dextran. Erythrocyte lysis buffer was the best isolation method as it is fast, inexpensive and works with either fresh or stored blood. The sensitivity of PCR- and real-time PCR detection of Salmonella in spiked blood was improved when whole blood was first lysed using erythrocyte lysis buffer prior to DNA extraction. Removal of erythrocytes and clotting factors also enabled reproducible lysis of Salmonella and fragmentation of DNA, which are necessary for MAMEF sensing. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the erythrocyte lysis procedure prior to DNA extraction has enabled improved sensitivity of Salmonella detection by PCR and real-time PCR and has allowed lysis and fragmentation of Salmonella using microwave radiation (for future detection by MAMEF). SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Adaptation of the blood lysis method represents a fundamental breakthrough that improves the sensitivity of DNA-based detection of Salmonella in blood.
AIMS: Isolation of Salmonella Typhi from blood culture is the standard diagnostic for confirming typhoid fever but it is unavailable in many developing countries. We previously described a Microwave Accelerated Metal Enhanced Fluorescence (MAMEF)-based assay to detect Salmonella in medium. Attempts to detect Salmonella in blood were unsuccessful, presumably due to the interference of erythrocytes. The objective of this study was to evaluate various blood treatment methods that could be used prior to PCR, real-time PCR or MAMEF to increase sensitivity of detection of Salmonella. METHODS AND RESULTS: We tested ammonium chloride and erythrocyte lysis buffer, water, Lymphocyte Separation Medium, BD Vacutainer(®) CPT(™) Tubes and dextran. Erythrocyte lysis buffer was the best isolation method as it is fast, inexpensive and works with either fresh or stored blood. The sensitivity of PCR- and real-time PCR detection of Salmonella in spiked blood was improved when whole blood was first lysed using erythrocyte lysis buffer prior to DNA extraction. Removal of erythrocytes and clotting factors also enabled reproducible lysis of Salmonella and fragmentation of DNA, which are necessary for MAMEF sensing. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the erythrocyte lysis procedure prior to DNA extraction has enabled improved sensitivity of Salmonella detection by PCR and real-time PCR and has allowed lysis and fragmentation of Salmonella using microwave radiation (for future detection by MAMEF). SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Adaptation of the blood lysis method represents a fundamental breakthrough that improves the sensitivity of DNA-based detection of Salmonella in blood.
Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A and B cause enteric fever, febrile illnesses that cannot be clinically distinguished from one another and which are difficult to differentiate from other causes of febrile illness (Crump 2012). Developing improved and rapid tests to diagnose these infections is considered one of the highest priorities to achieve control of enteric fever at the individual and population levels. A sensitive, specific, rapid, robust, affordable test is needed that can differentiate febrile patients with treatable enteric fever infections from those who have fever caused by other infectious agents such as dengue, Plasmodium or other bacteria. Successful diagnosis of enteric feverpatients in a district or region can influence decisions to implement currently licensed typhoid vaccines or future typhoid and paratyphoid A vaccines that are under development (Crump et al. 2003, 2004; Levine 2006; DeRoeck et al. 2007; Crump and Mintz 2010; Buckle et al. 2012; Herrick et al. 2012; Lozano et al. 2012; Martin 2012). In sub-Saharan Africa, nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) serovars, in particular, S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis, are cardinal causes of invasive bacterial disease (sepsis, meningitis) in young children and HIV-infected adults and diagnostic tests are needed to identify these infections and to differentiate them from enteric fever (Graham et al. 2000; Feasey et al. 2012; Okoro et al. 2012; MacLennan and Levine 2013).The current gold standard method for identifying invasive Salmonella is their detection by culture of aspirated bone marrow. However, collecting bone marrow as a routine diagnostic is clearly impractical. Accordingly, culture of blood provides a logistically much simpler diagnostic test. Nevertheless, it can take several days to detect and determine the serovar of Salmonella in blood or bone marrow (Reisner and Woods 1999; Durmaz et al. 2003). Importantly, in developing countries, few health care facilities in low resource settings have the laboratory infrastructure, skilled personnel or budgets required to perform blood or bone marrow cultures. Thus, there is a pressing need for a simpler, more rapid and affordable means to identify invasive Salmonella infections to guide therapy in individual patients and to provide epidemiologic information on the endemic circulation of specific serovars in the community (Feasey et al. 2012), as well as in outbreak situations (Neil et al. 2012).Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with gel-based identification of amplicons is potentially more sensitive and rapid than blood culture and reportedly detects as few as 10 CFU ml−1 of Salmonella in blood (Sanchez-Jimenez and Cardona-Castro 2004). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) has been shown to detect 100–200 organisms per ml of blood (Nga et al. 2010). While these technologies, as reported so far, are promising, the reported limits of detection are deemed to be insufficiently sensitive, as the median S. Typhi count in the blood of Vietnamese children with suspected enteric fever was 1 CFU ml−1 (range <0·3–387 CFU ml−1) (Wain et al. 1998). Similarly, low concentrations of NTS in blood have been demonstrated by Gordon et al. (2010).Microwave-accelerated metal-enhanced fluorescence (MAMEF) is an ultra-fast, highly sensitive DNA hybridization-based methodology that has been adapted to allow more sensitive detection of Salmonella (Tennant et al. 2011). This technology integrates metal-enhanced fluorescence using metallic nanoparticle substrates for amplification of fluorescence signatures with low power microwave heating to kinetically accelerate bio-molecular recognition events between basic DNA probes (Aslan et al. 2007). MAMEF has been adapted by Tennant et al. (2011) to detect the origin of replication (oriC) locus that is conserved among all Salmonella serovars. Following microwave-accelerated lysis, released and fragmented bacterial DNA is hybridized to a molecular probe, allowing detection of as low as 1 CFU of Salmonella in 1 ml of bacteriologic medium in <30 s. The MAMEF Salmonella assay is specific and does not detect other bacterial species commonly isolated from blood (Tennant et al. 2011).Although MAMEF reliably detects Salmonella in culture medium, initial attempts to detect bacteria in diluted whole blood following lysis were not reproducible due to congealing of erythrocytes and clotting factors during microwave heating. Recognizing that about 60% of Salmonella in the blood of an infected individual reside in the mononuclear cells and that direct plating of buffy coat yielded sensitivity comparable to blood culture (Wain et al. 1998), we undertook to develop a method that isolates white blood cells for testing by PCR or future MAMEF.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains, blood and ethics statement
Attenuated Salmonella Enteritidis strain CVD 1940 (pGEN206) (Tennant et al. 2011) and S. Typhi live oral vaccine strain CVD 909 (ΔaroC ΔaroD ΔhtrA Ptac-tviA) (Hone et al. 1991; Levine et al. 1996; Wang et al. 2000) were used to safely spike blood. Non-Salmonella strains used to determine specificity included Escherichia coli Bort, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 and Klebsiella pneumoniae B5055 from collections at the Center for Vaccine Development (CVD). Salmonella spp., E. coli, P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae were grown in HS bacteriological medium (5 g sodium chloride, 10 g soytone (Teknova, Hollister, CA), 5 g Hy Yest 412 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in 1 l distilled water) at 37°C. Media were supplemented with guanine (0·001% w/v) and 50 μg ml−1 carbenicillin for growth of CVD 1940(pGEN206); culture medium for CVD 909 was supplemented with 2, 3-dihydroxybenzoate (DHB) (0·0001% w/v). Whole human blood with sodium heparin anticoagulant was purchased from Innovative Research (Novi, MI). For the buffy coat experiments, fresh blood was obtained from volunteers under the approval of the University of Maryland, Baltimore Institutional Review Board and used within 8 h. All blood donors provided written informed consent.
Salmonella uptake assay
7 × 103 CFU of S. Enteritidis strain CVD 1940 (pGEN206) were inoculated into 2 ml of whole blood and the buffy coat was separated by mixing the blood with 2 ml of 1× PBS, layering carefully onto lymphocyte separation medium (Corning cellgro, Manassas, VA) and centrifuging at 400 for 10 min. The buffy coat was removed and lysed with a final concentration of 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Viable counts were performed by mixing the lysed buffy coat with 20 ml of molten HS-agar supplemented with guanine (0·001% w/v) and 50 μg ml−1 carbenicillin. Colonies were counted after 24-h incubation at 37°C and the percentage of intracellular bacteria recovered was determined in relation to the initial inoculum.
Preparation of blood
Six techniques to separate white blood cells from erythrocytes were evaluated, including erythrocyte lysis buffer, ammonium chloride lysis buffer, distilled water, BD Vacutainer® CPT™ tubes, dextran, and lymphocyte separation medium, as described below. Following erythrocyte lysis, white blood cell pellets were suspended in various diluents (1× TE buffer, 1× PBS, 0·05× PBS, animal product-free LB Lennox medium (APF-LB; Athena Environmental Sciences, Baltimore, MD) and 1× TE buffer plus 5 g l−1 of NaCl), as necessary.
Erythrocyte and ammonium chloride lysis buffer
Two ml of whole human blood were mixed with 18 ml of 1× erythrocyte lysis buffer diluted from a 10× stock (82·6 g ammonium chloride, 0·37 g EDTA and 10 g potassium phosphate in 1 l distilled water) or ammonium chloride buffer alone (8·26 g ammonium chloride in 1 l distilled water). Each sample was inverted 10 times, incubated at room temperature for 2 min and centrifuged for 5 min at 400 using a swing bucket rotor followed by removal of the supernatant, thus removing the erythrocyte debris and leaving behind a pellet consisting of white blood cells and a small amount of erythrocytes. The pellet was resuspended in 20 ml of fresh erythrocyte lysis buffer (ammonium chloride alone or 1× erythrocyte lysis buffer), inverted five times and centrifuged again to ensure complete lysis of erythrocytes. The supernatant was removed leaving behind a white blood cell pellet.
Water
Two millilitres of whole blood were mixed with 18 ml of distilled water. The sample was inverted 10 times, incubated at room temperature for 2 min and centrifuged for 5 min at 400 , thus removing the erythrocyte cell debris and leaving behind a white blood cell pellet. The pellet was resuspended in 20 ml water, inverted five times and centrifuged again to ensure complete erythrocyte lysis. The supernatant was removed leaving behind a white blood cell pellet.
BD Vacutainer® CPT™ (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ)
Buffy coat was obtained by drawing 8 ml of whole blood into a BD Vacutainer® CPT™ cell preparation tube containing sodium heparin and centrifuged in a swing bucket centrifuge at 1500 for 15 min. The buffy coat layer was transferred to a fresh tube, resuspended and washed in 1× PBS and centrifuged at 16 000 for 3 min to remove the PBS.
Dextran
Buffy coat was obtained by mixing 2 ml of fresh whole blood with 2 ml of 2% dextran (Sigma Aldrich) in 0·9% normal saline containing 25 mmol l−1 sodium citrate and incubated for 30 min at room temperature (Boyum 1964). The buffy coat, which was the upper layer, was washed twice with 1× PBS in a fresh tube and centrifuged at 16 000 for 3 min to remove the erythrocytes and pellet the white blood cells.
Lymphocyte separation medium
Buffy coat was obtained by mixing 2 ml of fresh whole blood with 2 ml of 1× PBS and layering onto 2 ml lymphocyte separation medium (Corning cellgro). The mixture was centrifuged at 400 using a swing bucket rotor for 5 min to separate the buffy coat from the erythrocytes and plasma.
Detection of Salmonella DNA by gel-based PCR
Extraction of DNA from spiked whole blood
DNA was extracted from 2 ml of whole blood spiked with 4·4 × 103 CFU, 4·4 × 104 CFU, 4·4 × 105 CFU or 4·4 × 106 CFU of CVD 909 using the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified DNA was eluted in 300 μl of nuclease-free water.
Extraction of DNA from spiked white blood cells
Two millilitres of whole blood was lysed using erythrocyte lysis buffer as described above. The white blood cell pellets were resuspended in 200 μl PBS and subsequently spiked with 4·4 × 103 CFU, 4·4 × 104 CFU, 4·4 × 105 CFU or 4·4 × 106 CFU of CVD 909 and DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified DNA was eluted in 100 μl of nuclease-free water.
PCR
PCR amplification was performed in 1× PCR buffer containing 1·5 mmol l−1 MgCl2, 2·5 U Green Taq DNA polymerase (Genscript, Piscataway, NJ), 0·2 mmol l−1 dNTP and primers oriCF (5′- TTATTAGGATCGCGCCAGGC-3′) and oriCR (5′- AAAGAATAACCGTTGTTCAC-3′) which detect all Salmonella at a final concentration of 0·5 μmol l−1 and combined with 5 μl of extracted DNA in a reaction volume of 50 μl in a T100™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad laboratories, Hercules, CA) (Widjojoatmodjo et al. 1991; Levy et al. 2008). Cycling parameters were as follows: 94°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s with a final extension of 72°C for 5 min. The primers described above yielded an amplicon size of 163 bp. PCR products were separated on 2% (w/v) agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized using a UV transilluminator.
Detection of Salmonella DNA by real-time PCR
DNA was extracted from 2 ml of whole blood spiked with 4, 41, 410 CFU or 4100 CFU of CVD 909 using the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Concentrations of CVD 909 were obtained by serial dilution in HS bacteriological medium. The purified DNA was eluted in 300 μl of nuclease-free water.Two millilitres of whole blood was lysed using erythrocyte lysis buffer as described above. The white blood cell pellets were resuspended in 200 μl PBS and subsequently spiked with three ten-fold dilution series of CVD 909 (ranging from 0·3 CFU to 6 × 105 CFU). DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Viable counts of CVD 909 were obtained by serial dilution on HS-agar plates. The purified DNA was eluted in 50 μl of nuclease-free water or AE buffer from the QIAamp kit.Primers used for real-time PCR targeted STY0201, a S. Typhi putative fimbrial-like adhesion protein and were taken from Nga et al. (Nga et al. 2010). The primer and probe sequences are as follows: ST-Frt, 5′ CGCGAAGTCAGAGTCGACATAG 3′; ST-Rrt, 5′ AAGACCTCAACGCCGATCAC 3′; and, ST- Probe, 5′ FAM-CATTTGTTCTGGAGCAGGCTGACGG-TAMRA 3′. Reactions were performed using TaqMan® Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (2×), No AmpErase® UNG (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), combined with 5 μl template DNA, 0·9 μmol l−1 forward and reverse primers and 0·25 μmol l−1 probe in a 20 μl reaction volume. Real-time PCR amplification was performed on an ABI Fast 7500DX instrument (Life Technologies). Cycling parameters were as follows: initial denaturation of 95°C for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 3 s, annealing and extension at 60°C for 30 s.
Lysis of Salmonella by microwave radiation
In order to focus microwaves, gold bowtie lysis triangles were deposited on glass slides as described previously (Tennant et al. 2011). A single self-adhesive silicon isolator (33 mm diameter) (Stockwell Elastomerics, Philadelphia, PA) was placed over the gold bow-tie triangles to create a 5-ml lysing chamber. To optimize the lysing procedure which both lyses bacteria and breaks the DNA into small fragments, white blood cells were resuspended in 1 ml of various diluents following red blood cell lysis. Overnight cultures of bacteria (109 CFU ml−1) were diluted to the desired concentration in PBS and 10 μl of bacteria were added to the white blood cell suspension. The bacteria-spiked white blood cell samples were then heated in a Frigidaire microwave (Model No. FFCM0934LB; 900 watts) for 25 s on 30% power. In order to determine the optimal media for microwave lysis, lysis in 1 ml of water was compared to the same volume of 1× TE buffer, 1× PBS, 0·05× PBS, APF-LB and 1× TE buffer plus 5 g l−1 of NaCl. A cracking scale for the gold lysis bow-tie structures after exposure to microwave irradiation was determined on a scale of 1–5, with 1 representing small cracks and 5 representing complete disintegration of the gold bow ties. For visualization of DNA fragments on a gel, 1 ml overnight bacterial culture containing 109 CFU Salmonella was pelleted, resuspended in 1 ml TE plus 5 g l−1 NaCl and added to white blood cells separated from 2 ml whole blood by erythrocyte blood cell lysis buffer. The suspension was microwave lysed and DNA was ethanol precipitated with 0·1× volume of 3 mol l−1 sodium acetate pH 5·2 and 2× volume of prechilled molecular grade ethanol. DNA was pelleted, washed with 70% ethanol, air-dried and resuspended in 30 μl of TE and the entire volume was electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel. DNA fragments were visualized by staining with ethidium bromide to identify double stranded DNA or SYBR® Gold (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR) to identify single stranded DNA. DNA fragment size was verified with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA).
Results
Salmonella uptake by white blood cells
In patients with typhoid fever the majority of S. Typhi reside in mononuclear phagocytes. We therefore conducted a Salmonella uptake assay using fresh whole blood and separating the white blood cells to assess uptake in a laboratory setting. When whole blood was removed from a healthy donor and inoculated with 7 × 103 CFU of Salmonella, an average of only 1·4% (range of 1·2–1·6%) was found to be taken up by the mononuclear cells, results which are corroborated in previous studies by Rubin et al. (1990). Hence, to account for this limitation in the laboratory setting, Salmonella were added to isolated white blood cells after the processing of blood by the various separation techniques that we tested (Fig.1).
Figure 1
Flow chart of procedure for blood lysis and subsequent DNA detection by PCR and MAMEF.
Flow chart of procedure for blood lysis and subsequent DNA detection by PCR and MAMEF.
Blood lysis
We tested six techniques for separating white blood cells from whole blood. Three methods involved whole blood lysis and the remaining three methods involved buffy coat separation. Of the three whole blood lysis techniques (either ammonium chloride alone, 1× erythrocyte lysis buffer or water), 1× erythrocyte lysis buffer removed erythrocytes most effectively, and yielded the purest sample of white blood cells (Fig.2). When this technique was applied to 2 ml of whole blood spiked with 103 CFU ml−1 of Salmonella, 40% of the extracellular bacteria were recovered from the pellet after centrifugation. Of the three buffy coat separation techniques tested, the white blood cells obtained from the BD Vacutainer® CPT™ tube achieved the most complete separation of white blood cells followed by the lymphocyte separation medium and then dextran (Fig.2). However, the BD Vacutainer® CPT™ tube was the most expensive of the separation techniques tested here (Table 1). Erythrocyte lysis buffer and dextran were found to be the two best methods as they yielded the purest samples of white blood cells (i.e. removed erythrocytes most effectively), utilized inexpensive reagents, involved fast processing and allowed both intracellular and extracellular Salmonella to be isolated.
Figure 2
Blood lysis. White blood cell pellet obtained when whole blood is processed by ammonium chloride (a), erythrocyte lysis buffer (b), water (c), BD Vacutainer® CPT™ Tube (d), dextran (e) and lymphocyte separation medium (f). Buffy coat (arrows) separated by BD Vacutainer® CPT™ Tube (g), lymphocyte separation medium (h) and dextran (i).
Table 1
Comparison of blood separation methods
Blood component
Blood separation method
Cheap reagents
Fast*
Obtain intracellular and extracellular bacteria
Large equipment†
Small equipment‡
Whole Blood
Erythrocyte or ammonium chloride lysis buffer
Y§
Y
Y
Y
N
Water
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Buffy Coat
Dextran
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Lymphocyte separation medium
N
N
N
Y
Y
BD Vacutainer® CPT™
N
Y
N
N
Y
Processing time is 45 min for 10 samples.
Requires bench top centrifuge with swing bucket rotor.
Requires microcentrifuge.
Y, Yes; N, No.
Comparison of blood separation methodsProcessing time is 45 min for 10 samples.Requires bench top centrifuge with swing bucket rotor.Requires microcentrifuge.Y, Yes; N, No.Blood lysis. White blood cell pellet obtained when whole blood is processed by ammonium chloride (a), erythrocyte lysis buffer (b), water (c), BD Vacutainer® CPT™ Tube (d), dextran (e) and lymphocyte separation medium (f). Buffy coat (arrows) separated by BD Vacutainer® CPT™ Tube (g), lymphocyte separation medium (h) and dextran (i).
Gel-based PCR detection of Salmonella
To determine whether sensitivity of detection of Salmonella in blood could be improved by targeting white blood cells instead of using whole blood, we used conventional gel-based PCR. We found that when the QIAamp Mini blood kit was used to extract DNA from spiked white blood cells (separated from 2 ml whole blood using 1× erythrocyte buffer), we could detect 4·4 × 105 and 4·4 × 106 CFU of S. Typhi CVD 909 by PCR. In contrast, when the QIAamp Midi blood kit was used to extract DNA from 2 ml spiked whole blood, only the 4·4 × 106 CFU sample was detected (Fig.3). 4·4 × 103 CFU and 4·4 × 104 CFU Salmonella was not detected using either extraction method.
Figure 3
Gel-based PCR detection of Salmonella DNA. Detection of oriC by PCR on DNA extracted from spiked whole blood or pretreated blood. (a) DNA extracted from whole blood (using a QIAmp Midi blood kit). (b) DNA extracted from lysed blood (erythrocyte lysis followed by QIAmp Mini blood kit). Lane MW, 1 Kb plus DNA ladder (Invitrogen). Lanes 1, blood only; 2, blood spiked with 4·4 × 103 CFU CVD 909; 3, blood spiked with 4·4 × 104 CFU CVD 909; 4, blood spiked with 4·4 × 105 CFU CVD 909; and 5, blood spiked with 4·4 × 106 CFU CVD 909.
Gel-based PCR detection of Salmonella DNA. Detection of oriC by PCR on DNA extracted from spiked whole blood or pretreated blood. (a) DNA extracted from whole blood (using a QIAmp Midi blood kit). (b) DNA extracted from lysed blood (erythrocyte lysis followed by QIAmp Mini blood kit). Lane MW, 1 Kb plus DNA ladder (Invitrogen). Lanes 1, blood only; 2, blood spiked with 4·4 × 103 CFU CVD 909; 3, blood spiked with 4·4 × 104 CFU CVD 909; 4, blood spiked with 4·4 × 105 CFU CVD 909; and 5, blood spiked with 4·4 × 106 CFU CVD 909.
Real-time PCR detection of Salmonella
Following the promising results using gel-based PCR, we determined whether combining RBC lysis with a mini QIAamp kit could also lead to improved detection by real-time PCR. First, we spiked whole blood with various concentrations of S. Typhi and performed qPCR as described by Nga et al. (2010) who showed a detection limit for this assay of 100–200 organisms per ml blood when DNA was extracted using a QIAamp blood midi kit. In our hands, using the same procedure, we were able to detect 41 CFU suspended in 2 ml blood (Table 2). We found that when the QIAamp Mini blood kit was used to extract DNA from spiked white blood cells (separated from 2 ml whole blood using 1× erythrocyte buffer), we could detect as low as 0·3 CFU by real-time PCR (Fig.4). As expected, we observed an inverse relationship between CFU and cycle threshold (Ct) values.
Table 2
Real-time PCR detection of Salmonella Typhi in 2 ml blood using DNA extracted by a QIAamp DNA midi kit as per Nga et al. (2010)
CFU per 2 ml blood
Ct value
Standard deviation
No. of replicates positive/Total no. of replicates tested
4120
33·52
0·3
3/3
412
37·26
1·14
3/3
41
38·27
0·46
3/3
4
ND
ND
0/3
ND, Not detected.
Figure 4
Real-time PCR detection of Salmonella DNA. Two millilitres of whole blood was lysed using erythrocyte lysis buffer and spiked with the shown CFU of Salmonella Typhi CVD 909. DNA was extracted using a QIAamp Mini blood kit and S. Typhi was detected by qPCR.
Real-time PCR detection of Salmonella Typhi in 2 ml blood using DNA extracted by a QIAamp DNA midi kit as per Nga et al. (2010)ND, Not detected.Real-time PCR detection of Salmonella DNA. Two millilitres of whole blood was lysed using erythrocyte lysis buffer and spiked with the shown CFU of Salmonella Typhi CVD 909. DNA was extracted using a QIAamp Mini blood kit and S. Typhi was detected by qPCR.
Microwave lysis of Salmonella and fragmentation of DNA
Previous attempts to detect Salmonella in whole blood by MAMEF were unsuccessful due to congealing of erythrocytes and clotting factors under microwave heating (results not shown). The role of clotting factors in congealing was supported by the fact that when plasma and serum were microwave lysed, samples also congealed under exposure to microwave heat (results not shown).We took advantage of the fact that approx. 60% of Salmonella are intracellular and focused our attempts on harvesting and lysing white blood cells. We tested microwave lysis of white blood cells spiked with Salmonella and suspended in various diluents. When approx. 1000 CFU of bacteria were serially diluted in PBS down to 0·1 CFU, added to purified white blood cells, resuspended in 1 ml TE plus 5 g l−1 NaCl and microwave lysed, 100% lysis was observed reproducibly in spiked samples containing 100 CFU or more as determined by pre- and postlysis viable counts (>10 samples tested per bacterial dilution). As a result of complete removal of erythrocytes using 1× erythrocyte buffer, we were able to avoid congealing under microwave heat.We also observed that when too little salt was present during microwave lysis, DNA release and fragmentation was suboptimal (as evidenced by a DNA smear on an agarose gel with a peak band of approx. 100 bp compared to a single approx. 25 bp band when fragmentation is complete). On the other hand, when too much salt was present, the sample reached boiling temperature too rapidly and the sample boiled over in the microwave (Table 3). When the white blood cells were resuspended in water alone (0 mol l−1 NaCl), the peak fragment size was approx. 100 bp. Similarly, when the white blood cells were resuspended in 0·05× PBS, which contains approx. 6 mmol l−1 sodium chloride, DNA fragments of about 100 bp were also observed (Table 3). In contrast, samples containing white blood cells resuspended in 1× PBS (0·15 mol l−1 sodium chloride) boiled over in the microwave due to overheating at these high salt concentrations and sample was lost in the microwave cavity. Optimal conditions for microwave lysis were ultimately identified as white blood cells suspended in APF-LB (previously used for microwave lysis of Salmonella as described by Tennant et al. (2011)) or 1× TE buffer plus 5 g l−1 NaCl (which both contain 80 mmol l−1 NaCl). Eventually, we were able to estimate the effectiveness of microwave lysing and DNA release by visually inspecting the cracking of the gold bow tie after microwave lysis with more cracking signalling maximal DNA release and fragmentation (Fig.5b). Lysis was optimized by adjusting the microwave power and time until maximal DNA release and fragmentation to approx. 25 bp was achieved at 30% power and 25 s from white blood cells suspended in 1 ml 1× TE buffer plus 5 g l−1 NaCl and 109 CFU of CVD 909. In order to confirm that the fragment size achieved from microwave lysed white blood cells spiked with Salmonella (and resuspended in medium containing 80 mmol l−1 NaCl) was the same as was previously optimized for broth samples as described by Tennant et al. (2011), side by side comparison of lysis of Salmonella in APF-LB vs microwave lysis of spiked white blood cells was performed. We examined gold cracking and also verified fragment sizes using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Fig.5c–f). As shown in Fig.6, SYBR® Gold staining revealed that the DNA was mostly single stranded. Treatment of samples with DNase or RNase suggested that the nucleic acid released was mostly DNA and not RNA (Fig.6). As a result of complete removal of erythrocytes, we were able to avoid congealing under microwave heat and enable efficient lysis of samples.
Table 3
Salt concentration-dependent fragmentation of DNA and gold cracking produced by microwave lysis
Lysis solution
NaCl concentration, mol l−1
Gold cracking*
Average fragment size†
Water
0
3
100 bp
TE
0
3
100 bp
0·05× PBS
0·006
3
100 bp
APF-LB
0·08
4·5
25 bp
TE + 5 g l−1 NaCl
0·08
4·5
25 bp
1× PBS
0·136
4·5
Sample boiled over
Gold cracking scale 1–5: 1, small cracks; 5, completely cracked.
DNA fragment size determined by visualizing SYBR Gold- and ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels or using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer after microwave lysis at 30% power, 25 s.
Figure 5
Microwave lysis of Salmonella. (a) Gold lysing triangles with bowtie configuration and silicone holder in a microwave. (b) Increasing gold cracking with increasing salt concentration (Gold cracking scale 1–5: 1, small cracks; 5, completely cracked). (c) Gold lysing triangle showing extent of cracking when Salmonella is lysed in broth. (d) Gold lysing triangle showing extent of cracking when Salmonella is lysed in blood. (e–f) Fragment size of DNA released from Salmonella lysed in broth and blood, respectively, using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer.
Figure 6
DNase and RNase treatment of Salmonella. (a) Ethidium bromide, and (b) SYBR gold stained 2% agarose gels. Lane 1, Low Molecular Weight DNA ladder (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA); Lane 2, nucleic acid from lysed whole blood released from Salmonella in blood (109 CFU ml−1) after microwave lysis; Lane 3, nucleic acid from lysed whole blood containing 109 CFU ml−1
Salmonella and treated with RNase; Lane 4, nucleic acid from lysed whole blood containing 109 CFU ml−1
Salmonella and treated with DNase.
Salt concentration-dependent fragmentation of DNA and gold cracking produced by microwave lysisGold cracking scale 1–5: 1, small cracks; 5, completely cracked.DNA fragment size determined by visualizing SYBR Gold- and ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels or using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer after microwave lysis at 30% power, 25 s.Microwave lysis of Salmonella. (a) Gold lysing triangles with bowtie configuration and silicone holder in a microwave. (b) Increasing gold cracking with increasing salt concentration (Gold cracking scale 1–5: 1, small cracks; 5, completely cracked). (c) Gold lysing triangle showing extent of cracking when Salmonella is lysed in broth. (d) Gold lysing triangle showing extent of cracking when Salmonella is lysed in blood. (e–f) Fragment size of DNA released from Salmonella lysed in broth and blood, respectively, using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer.DNase and RNase treatment of Salmonella. (a) Ethidium bromide, and (b) SYBR gold stained 2% agarose gels. Lane 1, Low Molecular Weight DNA ladder (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA); Lane 2, nucleic acid from lysed whole blood released from Salmonella in blood (109 CFU ml−1) after microwave lysis; Lane 3, nucleic acid from lysed whole blood containing 109 CFU ml−1
Salmonella and treated with RNase; Lane 4, nucleic acid from lysed whole blood containing 109 CFU ml−1
Salmonella and treated with DNase.
Discussion
We have previously shown that Salmonella suspended in bacteriological medium can be successfully lysed using microwaves, allowing highly sensitive detection of Salmonella DNA by MAMEF (Tennant et al. 2011). However, when we attempted detection of a synthetic oriC oligonucleotide suspended in blood, MAMEF was not able to detect a fluorescent signal. When the spiked blood sample was diluted with an equal volume of PBS, a fluorescent signal was detected, presumably due to a reduction in the viscosity of blood. After repeated experiments using diluted blood, we found that sometimes the blood would congeal during microwave heating, which rendered it impossible for the fluorescent signal to be detected. We determined that it was necessary to remove the erythrocytes in order to avoid congealing under microwave radiation and to allow the fluorophore to be detected.Cognizant of the fact that the majority of Salmonella organisms in an infected individual reside in the mononuclear cells, we compared two fundamental approaches to obtain the mononuclear cells. In the first approach we treated whole blood by various methods to lyse the erythrocytes and thereupon pelleted the white blood cells. In the alternative approach, we kept the erythrocytes intact, while separating out the mononuclear cell-rich buffy coat layer. Whereas approx. 60% of S. Typhi are found within mononuclear cells in a typhoid feverpatient, when blood from a healthy human is spiked with Salmonella in vitro, only approx. 1–2% of the bacteria are taken up by monocytes. To overcome this experimental limitation, we spiked the white blood cells after treating the blood with various techniques. This provided a means to more accurately compare the efficiency of our various lysis and detection methods.Each blood treatment method has its advantages and disadvantages (Table 1). It is attractive to have the ability to obtain both extracellular and intracellular Salmonella as is possible by treating blood with ammonium chloride, erythrocyte lysis buffer or water. Moreover, these are inexpensive reagents and the methods are practical and fast. However, they suffer one possible limitation for developing country laboratories, namely, the separation of white blood cells and bacteria requires the use of a bench top centrifuge. Even then, while all the intracellular organisms may be recovered, not all the extracellular organisms pellet at the low speed needed for optimal white blood cell separation. Although water is a simple and inexpensive method for lysis, it is less well established and may cause premature lysis of white blood cells and their bacteria; release of DNA earlier than desired may result in loss of DNA when the supernatant is discarded. Overall, erythrocyte lysis buffer was our preferred method of treating whole blood.For the buffy coat methods, blood must be processed within a 12-h period for optimal separation of the buffy coat. For the lymphocyte separation medium, in addition to requiring a bench top centrifuge, more skilled handling of small volumes of blood is necessary to prevent the disruption of the interface between the buffy coat layer and the erythrocytes. On the other hand, while the BD Vacutainer® CPT™ tube requires a simple and cheap clinical swing bucket centrifuge and can be processed on site, the high cost (∼$9 per tube) makes it too expensive for routine use in many resource poor areas. Among the buffy coat extraction methods, dextran is the most promising because it is easy to perform, inexpensive, easy to handle and requires only an inexpensive, small microcentrifuge. However, it is highly effective only when used with fresh blood.For utilization in field situations where blood may be collected from a remote site and transported for some hours to a blood processing laboratory, erythrocyte lysis buffer is the preferred method for isolation of white blood cells, as it does not require fresh blood for optimal separation. Additionally, as we showed that we could recover an additional 40% of extracellular Salmonella after erythrocyte lysis, it is conceivable that if 1000 CFU of Salmonella were present in a sample of blood, 600 CFU (60%) would be recovered from the intracellular portion along with 160 CFU (16%) of the 400 extracellular Salmonella, totalling 760 CFU, i.e. 76% of the CFU present in the entire blood sample.Despite the limitations inherent in each separation method, one major advantage common to all is that any volume of blood may be processed and the white blood cells resuspended in any volume necessary for detection by molecular methods such as MAMEF or PCR or quantitative real-time PCR. This is particularly important in Salmonella infection in young and malnourished subjects from whom only small volumes of blood are typically collected to make a laboratory diagnosis.It is important to stress that testing white blood cells alone from typhoid feverpatients does not decrease sensitivity, as has already been demonstrated by Wain et al. (1998), where culture of whole blood vs buffy coat were equally sensitive. We have shown improved sensitivity using conventional PCR on DNA isolated from spiked white blood cells obtained by erythrocyte lysis and a QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit compared to DNA from spiked whole blood obtained from a QIAamp DNA Blood Midi kit. Ten-fold less bacteria were detected by gel-based PCR using white blood cells compared to whole blood (4·4 × 105 CFU vs 4·4 × 106 CFU). Likewise, when real-time PCR was used, we were able to detect as low as 0·3 CFU S. Typhi mixed with white blood cells from 2 ml of blood. In contrast, detection of DNA extracted from whole blood using a midi kit shows a detection limit of more than 40 CFU S. Typhi. The increased sensitivity is most likely due to the fact that we could elute the DNA in a smaller volume using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit than the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi kit. As it is not possible to have <1 CFU, we hypothesize that we are also detecting dead bacteria which is an advantage of using molecular methods.We have also shown that we can effectively lyse Salmonella suspended in a buffy coat fraction in preparation for detection by MAMEF. Work is currently underway to determine the level of sensitivity of MAMEF.We conclude that adaptation of the erythrocyte lysis procedure has enabled improved sensitivity of detection by PCR and real-time PCR following DNA extraction and has allowed lysis and fragmentation of Salmonella using microwave radiation (for future detection by MAMEF). We are currently evaluating whether erythrocyte lysis and subsequent detection by real-time PCR is faster and more sensitive than blood culture in a typhoid endemic setting. These blood treatment methodologies may also be applicable for the typhoid/paratyphoid diagnostic assay (TPTest) that detects IgA antibody to Salmonella antigens elaborated by mononuclear cells (Khanam et al. 2013). Importantly, these methods are economical and can be adapted for use in field studies using molecular methods. They may also be used for diagnosis in hospitals that lack blood culture machines and antisera for identification of Salmonella, but which are capable of performing molecular biology procedures.
Authors: Robert L Herrick; Steven G Buchberger; Robert M Clark; Margaret Kupferle; Regan Murray; Paul Succop Journal: Health Econ Date: 2011-09-02 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Melita A Gordon; Anstead M K Kankwatira; Gershom Mwafulirwa; Amanda L Walsh; Mark J Hopkins; Christopher M Parry; E Brian Faragher; Eduard E Zijlstra; Robert S Heyderman; Malcolm E Molyneux Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Karen P Neil; Samir V Sodha; Luswa Lukwago; Shikanga O-Tipo; Matthew Mikoleit; Sherricka D Simington; Peter Mukobi; Stephen Balinandi; Samuel Majalija; Joseph Ayers; Atek Kagirita; Edward Wefula; Frank Asiimwe; Vianney Kweyamba; Deborah Talkington; Wun-Ju Shieh; Patricia Adem; Brigid C Batten; Sherif R Zaki; Eric Mintz Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Kadir Aslan; Yongxia Zhang; Stephen Hibbs; Les Baillie; Michael J R Previte; Chris D Geddes Journal: Analyst Date: 2007-09-11 Impact factor: 4.616
Authors: Stephen Baker; Christoph J Blohmke; Mailis Maes; Peter I Johnston; Thomas C Darton Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Liqing Zhou; Claire Jones; Malick M Gibani; Hazel Dobinson; Helena Thomaides-Brears; Sonu Shrestha; Christoph J Blohmke; Thomas C Darton; Andrew J Pollard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 3.240