Literature DB >> 25630813

Censoring government scientists and the role of consensus in science advice: a structured process for scientific advice in governments and peer-review in academia should shape science communication strategies.

Derrick Tupper de Kerckhove1, Michael David Rennie2, Roland Cormier3.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25630813      PMCID: PMC4364864          DOI: 10.15252/embr.201439680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN: 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Scientific dissent and public policy. Is targeting dissent a reasonable way to protect sound policy decisions?

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Kristen Intemann
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Bees, lies and evidence-based policy.

Authors:  Lynn Dicks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 49.962

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.