Literature DB >> 25630375

Who gets Hartmann's reversed in a regional centre?

R Hodgson1, V An2, D A Stupart2, G D Guest2, D A K Watters2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients who undergo a Hartmann's procedure do not have their stoma reversed. We analysed parameters and co-morbidity scales to assess their accuracy in predicting likelihood of undergoing reversal.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 165 patients from a prospective colorectal database who were discharged home following a Hartmann's procedure at Barwon Health (Geelong, Australia), a regional centre, between 2002 and 2010. Parameters measured included age, sex, time to reversal, ICU admission and pathology results were recorded. Patients' ASA, POSSUM and Elixhauser co-morbidity scales were retrospectively analysed.
RESULTS: Reversal of Hartmann's was performed in 74/165 (45%) patients after a median of 294 days (range 70-902). Age (mean 58.5 vs 72.9 years, p < 0.001), ICU stay (34/74 vs 66/91, p < 0.001), ASA (p < 0.002), Elixhauser co-morbidity count (mean 1.14 vs 1.92, p < 0.002) and a malignant diagnosis (9/74 vs 31/91, p < 0.002) were all associated with a decreased reversal rate on univariate analysis. Age was the only parameter found to be significant on multivariate analysis. The complication rate was 23/74, with 7/74 noted to have major complications (Clavian-Dindo III-IV). Reasons for not reversing patients included age and co-morbidities, patient refusal, and malignant disease progression.
CONCLUSIONS: More than half the patients undergoing a Hartmann's procedure did not proceed to a closure of their stoma. Age was the only parameter significant in predicting those patients undergoing reversal. Crown
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Co-morbidities; Colorectal; Hartmann's procedure; Regional centre; Stoma reversal; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25630375     DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  10 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of post-operative peritonitis after gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli; Ewen A Griffiths; Maurizio Nestori
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-08-12

2.  Authors' Reply: Perforated Diverticulitis with Generalized Peritonitis: Low Stoma Rate Using a "Damage Control Strategy".

Authors:  M Sohn; A Agha; P Steiner; A Hochrein; J Pratschke; P Ritschl; F Aigner; I Iesalnieks
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: still a complicated operation.

Authors:  N Horesh; Y Rudnicki; Y Dreznik; A P Zbar; M Gutman; O Zmora; D Rosin
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Hartmann's reversal: factors affecting complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Stewart Whitney; Benjamin D Gross; Alex Mui; Sue Hahn; Blake Read; Joel Bauer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Considerations for Hartmann's reversal and Hartmann's reversal outcomes-a multicenter study.

Authors:  Nir Horesh; Yonatan Lessing; Yaron Rudnicki; Ilan Kent; Haguy Kammar; Almog Ben-Yaacov; Yael Dreznik; Hagit Tulchinsky; Shmuel Avital; Eli Mavor; Nir Wasserberg; Hanoch Kashtan; Joseph M Klausner; Mordechai Gutman; Oded Zmora
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Association of Timing of Colostomy Reversal With Outcomes Following Hartmann Procedure for Diverticulitis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Resio; Raymond Jean; Alexander S Chiu; Kevin Y Pei
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 7.  Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann's reversal? An updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Chavrier; A Alves; B Menahem
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Factors Predicting the Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure.

Authors:  Ömer Yalkın; Fatih Altıntoprak; Mustafa Yener Uzunoğlu; Yasin Alper Yıldız; Muhammet Burak Kamburoğlu; Necattin Fırat; Fehmi Çelebi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.246

9.  Analysis of factors affecting reversal of Hartmann's procedure and post-reversal complications.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kang; Byung Mo Kang; Sang Nam Yoon; Jeong Yeon Kim; Jun Ho Park; Bo Young Oh; Jong Wan Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  COLOSTOMY CLOSURE: RISK FACTORS FOR COMPLICATIONS.

Authors:  Alexandre Z Fonseca; Edson Uramoto; Otto M Santos-Rosa; Stephanie Santin; Marcelo Ribeiro
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.