| Literature DB >> 25630232 |
Yeungyeung Liu1, Xin Huang2, Yuxia Yan3, Hanxiao Lin4, Jincai Zhang5, Dongying Xuan6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to describe the characteristics of dental fear of Chinese adult patients with periodontal disease and provide information for clinical assessment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25630232 PMCID: PMC4417219 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Results of linear regression analysis in three scales among 1203 patients
| Gender | Age | Marital status | Education | Periodontal status | Dental attendances | Scaling | Bleeding on brushing | Dentine hypersensitivity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| B | 1.44 | -0.03 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 0.56 | -0.45 | 0.43 | 0.38 | 0.53 |
| Beta | 0.23 | -0.15 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.08 | -0.06 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.10 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.004 | 0.045 | 0.002 | 0.013 | 0.001 |
| 95% CI | 1.09 ~ 1.79 | -0.05 ~ -0.01 | 0.23 ~ 1.12 | 0.22 ~ 0.54 | 0.17 ~ 0.94 | -0.89 ~ -0.01 | 0.15 ~ 0.71 | 0.08 ~ 0.68 | 0.23 ~ 0.84 |
|
| |||||||||
| B | 8.13 | -0.09 | NO | 1.80 | 3.49 | -2.44 | 2.38 | 2.68 | 2.27 |
| Beta | 0.25 | -0.08 | NO | 0.07 | 0.10 | -0.06 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
|
| <0.001 | 0.010 | NO | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.036 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| 95% CI | 6.33 ~ 9.33 | -0.15 ~ -0.02 | NO | 0.45 ~ 3.14 | 1.51 ~ 5.46 | -4.71 ~ -0.16 | 0.93 ~ 3.82 | 1.13 ~ 4.22 | 0.69 ~ 3.85 |
|
| |||||||||
| B | 3.56 | -0.04 | NO | NO | 1.41 | NO | 1.39 | NO | NO |
| Beta | 0.20 | -0.07 | NO | NO | 0.08 | NO | 0.11 | NO | NO |
|
| <0.001 | 0.030 | NO | NO | 0.012 | NO | <0.001 | NO | NO |
| 95% CI | 2.58 ~ 4.55 | -0.07 ~ 0.00 | NO | NO | 0.31 ~ 2.51 | NO | 0.64 ~ 2.13 | NO | NO |
B, Unstandardized Coefficients; Beta, Standardized coefficients; 95% CI, 95% Confidence interval; NO, variable not included in the model.
Dental fear level of DAS, DFS and S-DAI between patients with and without periodontal disease
| Patients with periodontal disease, Mean ± SD (n = 366) | Patients without periodontal disease, Mean ± SD (n = 837) | t value |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAS | 10.70 ± 3.09 | 10.24 ± 3.00 | -2.43 | 0.015 |
| DFS | 49.80 ± 15.80 | 46.91 ± 15.72 | -2.88 | 0.004 |
| S-DAI | 23.36 ± 8.51 | 22.63 ± 8.59 | -1.37 | 0.172 |
Figure 1The percentage of the DAS in patients with and without periodontal disease. The percentage of high dental fear in patients with periodontal disease was more than those without periodontal disease.
Results of linear regression analysis in three scales of patients with periodontal disease
| Gender | Dental attendances | Scaling | Bleeding on brushing | Dentine hypersensitivity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| B | 1.50 | -1.28 | NO | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| Beta | 0.23 | -0.18 | NO | 0.26 | 0.14 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | NO | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| 95% CI | 0.87 ~ 2.14 | -1.98 ~ -0.58 | NO | 0.22 ~ 1.25 | 0.20 ~ 1.29 |
|
| |||||
| B | 7.17 | -4.90 | 3.90 | 3.07 | 4.38 |
| Beta | 0.22 | -0.14 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.16 |
|
| <0.001 | 0.015 | 0.004 | 0.020 | 0.002 |
| 95% CI | 3.98 ~ 10.37 | -8.87 ~ -0.94 | 1.27 ~ 6.53 | 0.48 ~ 5.66 | 1.63 ~ 7.13 |
|
| |||||
| B | 3.55 | NO | 2.82 | NO | NO |
| Beta | 0.20 | NO | 0.22 | NO | NO |
|
| <0.001 | NO | <0.001 | NO | NO |
| 95% CI | 1.77 ~ 5.34 | NO | 1.52 ~ 4.12 | NO | NO |
B, Unstandardized Coefficients; Beta, Standardized coefficients; 95% CI, 95% Confidence interval; NO, variable not included in the model.
Figure 2The average score of each item in DFS between patients with and without periodontal disease. The five highest items were ‘drilling with the handpiece’, ‘overall fear in dental treatment’, ‘hearing drill’, ‘seeing drill’ and ‘injecting the anesthetic’ in both kinds of patients.