Literature DB >> 2562996

The effects of an internal analgesic formulary restriction on Medicaid drug expenditures in Wisconsin.

D H Kreling1, D J Knocke, R W Hammel.   

Abstract

The effects of removing propoxyphene napsylate products from the Wisconsin Medicaid drug program formulary were examined. Internal analgesic expenditures and usage data for 3-month periods before and after the removal were compared (April through June 1984 versus the same period in 1985). After adjusting for price and reimbursement changes between the two study periods, overall expenditures were slightly higher after removal of these products. Expenditures per recipient, prescription, and unit all increased, as did the number of prescriptions per recipient. Expenditures, prescriptions, and recipients increased more for propoxyphene hydrochloride products as substitutes for propoxyphene napsylate products than for products in any other category. Increases also occurred for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory products, suggesting they may have been chosen as replacement therapy. The proportion of napsylate prescriptions converted to hydrochloride prescriptions was larger for institutional patients than for noninstitutional patients. Although program expenditures did not decrease, as intended by the formulary change, other qualitative outcomes also should be considered, such as any therapeutic advantages the replacement products may have had for the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2562996     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198901000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  5 in total

Review 1.  Economic impact of cost-containment strategies in third party programmes in the US. Part II.

Authors:  C M Kozma; R M Schulz; W M Dickson; J T Dye; E R Cox; D A Holdford; L Michael; W N Yates; T L Young
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Institutional formularies: the relevance of pharmacoeconomic analysis to formulary decisions.

Authors:  R J Lipsy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Making a case for employing a societal perspective in the evaluation of Medicaid prescription drug interventions.

Authors:  Sanjoy Roy; S Suresh Madhavan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Does organisational culture influence prescribing in care homes for older people? A new direction for research.

Authors:  Carmel M Hughes; Kate Lapane; Margaret C Watson; Huw T O Davies
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  De-implementation of low value castration for men with prostate cancer: protocol for a theory-based, mixed methods approach to minimizing low value androgen deprivation therapy (DeADT).

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Sarah T Hawley; Daniela A Wittmann; Jane Forman; Tabitha Metreger; Jordan B Sparks; Kevin Zhu; Megan E V Caram; Brent K Hollenbeck; Danil V Makarov; John T Leppert; Jeremy B Shelton; Vahakn Shahinian; Sriram Srinivasaraghavan; Anne E Sales
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 7.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.