| Literature DB >> 25629608 |
.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25629608 PMCID: PMC4309405 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 2Subgroup analyses for DFS according to GILT expression.
(A) Forest plots showing hazard ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) for disease-free survival for the intensity of GILT staining in subgroup analyses by clinicopathologic characteristics of patients. (B) Forest plots showing hazard ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) for disease-free survival for the proportion score of GILT staining in subgroup analyses by clinicopathologic characteristics of patients. (C) Forest plots showing hazard ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) for disease-free survival for the total score of GILT staining in subgroup analyses by clinicopathologic characteristics of patients. Disease-free survival favored higher GILT expression over decreased expression, including the intensity, proportion, as well as total score of GILT staining in all subgroups (HRs>1).