Georgios Tsivgoulis1, Theodora Psaltopoulou2, Virginia G Wadley2, Andrei V Alexandrov2, George Howard2, Frederick W Unverzagt2, Claudia Moy2, Virginia J Howard2, Brett Kissela2, Suzanne E Judd2. 1. From the Second Department of Neurology, Attikon Hospital (G.T.) and Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics (T.P.), University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece; Department of Neurology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN (G.T., A.V.A.); International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Czech Republic (G.T.); Department of Medicine (V.G.W.), Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health (G.H., S.E.J.), and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health (V.J.H.), University of Alabama at Birmingham; Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (F.W.U.); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (C.M.); and Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, OH (B.K.). tsivgoulisgiorg@yahoo.gr. 2. From the Second Department of Neurology, Attikon Hospital (G.T.) and Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics (T.P.), University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece; Department of Neurology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN (G.T., A.V.A.); International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Czech Republic (G.T.); Department of Medicine (V.G.W.), Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health (G.H., S.E.J.), and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health (V.J.H.), University of Alabama at Birmingham; Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (F.W.U.); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (C.M.); and Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, OH (B.K.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are limited data on the potential association of adherence to Mediterranean diet (MeD) with incident stroke. We sought to assess the longitudinal association between greater adherence to MeD and risk of incident stroke. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated a population-based cohort of 30 239 individuals enrolled in REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, after excluding participants with stroke history, missing demographic data or food frequency questionnaires, and unavailable follow-up information. Adherence to MeD was categorized using MeD score. Incident stroke was adjudicated by expert panel review of medical records during a mean follow-up period of 6.5 years. RESULTS: Incident stroke was identified in 565 participants (2.8%; 497 and 68 cases of ischemic stroke [IS] and hemorrhagic stroke, respectively) of 20 197 individuals fulfilling the inclusion criteria. High adherence to MeD (MeD score, 5-9) was associated with lower risk of incident IS in unadjusted analyses (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.00; P=0.046). The former association retained its significance (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.96; P=0.016) after adjustment for demographics, vascular risk factors, blood pressure levels, and antihypertensive medications. When MeD was evaluated as a continuous variable, a 1-point increase in MeD score was independently associated with a 5% reduction in the risk of incident IS (95% confidence interval, 0-11%). We documented no association of adherence to MeD with incident hemorrhagic stroke. There was no interaction of race (P=0.37) on the association of adherence to MeD with incident IS. CONCLUSIONS: High adherence to MeD seems to be associated with a lower risk of incident IS independent of potential confounders. Adherence to MeD is not related to the risk of incident hemorrhagic stroke.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are limited data on the potential association of adherence to Mediterranean diet (MeD) with incident stroke. We sought to assess the longitudinal association between greater adherence to MeD and risk of incident stroke. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated a population-based cohort of 30 239 individuals enrolled in REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, after excluding participants with stroke history, missing demographic data or food frequency questionnaires, and unavailable follow-up information. Adherence to MeD was categorized using MeD score. Incident stroke was adjudicated by expert panel review of medical records during a mean follow-up period of 6.5 years. RESULTS: Incident stroke was identified in 565 participants (2.8%; 497 and 68 cases of ischemic stroke [IS] and hemorrhagic stroke, respectively) of 20 197 individuals fulfilling the inclusion criteria. High adherence to MeD (MeD score, 5-9) was associated with lower risk of incident IS in unadjusted analyses (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.00; P=0.046). The former association retained its significance (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.96; P=0.016) after adjustment for demographics, vascular risk factors, blood pressure levels, and antihypertensive medications. When MeD was evaluated as a continuous variable, a 1-point increase in MeD score was independently associated with a 5% reduction in the risk of incident IS (95% confidence interval, 0-11%). We documented no association of adherence to MeD with incident hemorrhagic stroke. There was no interaction of race (P=0.37) on the association of adherence to MeD with incident IS. CONCLUSIONS: High adherence to MeD seems to be associated with a lower risk of incident IS independent of potential confounders. Adherence to MeD is not related to the risk of incident hemorrhagic stroke.
Authors: Virginia G Wadley; Leslie A McClure; Virginia J Howard; Frederick W Unverzagt; Rodney C Go; Claudia S Moy; Martha R Crowther; Camilo R Gomez; George Howard Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-02-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Teresa T Fung; Kathryn M Rexrode; Christos S Mantzoros; JoAnn E Manson; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-02-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Patrizio Prati; Alberto Tosetto; Diego Vanuzzo; Giovanni Bader; Marco Casaroli; Luigi Canciani; Sergio Castellani; Pierre-Jean Touboul Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: M A Martínez-González; C de la Fuente-Arrillaga; J M Nunez-Cordoba; F J Basterra-Gortari; J J Beunza; Z Vazquez; S Benito; A Tortosa; M Bes-Rastrollo Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-05-29
Authors: Cheng Chen; Pengcheng Xun; Cari Tsinovoi; Leslie A McClure; John Brockman; Leslie MacDonald; Mary Cushman; Jianwen Cai; Lisa Kamendulis; Jason Mackey; Ka He Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Charles D Nicoli; Timothy B Plante; D Leann Long; Suzanne E Judd; Leslie A McClure; Pankaj Arora; Mary Cushman Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 2.689