Literature DB >> 25627985

Left ventricular three-dimensional quadripolar lead acute clinical study: the LILAC study.

François Philippon1, Lili Liu, Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung, Jean-Claude Deharo, Frederic Anselme, Peter Paul Delnoy, Harry Crijns, Carlos A Morillo, Andrew D Krahn, Klaus Gutleben, Julien Delumeau, Franck Molin.   

Abstract

AIMS: This multicenter acute clinical study was designed to verify novel three-dimensional (3D) quadripolar lead designs that can achieve ≤2.5 V average pacing capture threshold (PCT) not only at the apex, but also at the base of the left ventricle with phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) avoidance for cardiac resynchronization.
METHODS: During the implant procedure, up to two different left ventricular investigational leads were introduced and tested in the same target coronary vein based on the coronary sinus venogram in a wedged and unwedged position. Adverse events were collected in 30 days following the procedure.
RESULTS: Eighty-seven leads were tested in 50 patients. When the best performing spiral electrode was chosen from each lead testing, the average of the best PCT on spiral in a wedged position was similar to the unwedged position (1.7 ± 1.5 V vs 1.9 ± 1.5 V, P = ns) and was similar to the wedged tip electrode average PCT (1.7 ± 1.5 V vs 1.6 ± 1.6 V, P = ns). In the majority of patients (89-96%), pacing was achievable in a mid-basal ventricular location without PNS.
CONCLUSIONS: This acute study demonstrated that a 3D quadripolar spiral lead design can achieve acceptable PCTs and avoid PNS without repositioning the lead at implant in the vast majority of patients. It also demonstrated that this lead design can achieve mid-basal ventricular stimulation with low PCT and good acute stability. ©2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac resynchronization; lead design; quadripolar leads

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25627985     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  2 in total

1.  Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Hu; Lihui Zheng; Ligang Ding; Zhongpeng Du; Erpeng Liang; Lingmin Wu; Gang Chen; Xiaohan Fan; Yan Yao; Yu Jiang
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Maximization of interventricular conduction time by means of quadripolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Stabile; Valter Bianchi; Francesco Solimene; Assunta Iuliano; Quintino Parisi; Patrizia Pepi; Mario Bocchiardo; Francesco Urraro; Antonio De Simone; Roberto Ospizio; Antonio D'Onofrio
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 1.900

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.