BACKGROUND: Conventional microscopy underestimates the burden of malarial infection when compared with molecular diagnosis using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods. Lower density parasitemias serve as a reservoir for infection. We evaluated the prevalence of submicroscopic infections in an area of unstable malarial transmission in India and determined whether these infections negatively impacted maternal or fetal outcomes. METHODS: This cross-sectional study (2007-2008) was undertaken in two districts of Chhattisgarh, recruiting women from both antenatal clinics (ANCs) and delivery units (DUs). For ANC/DU subjects, peripheral/placental blood, respectively, was obtained for conventional microscopy and collected onto filter paper for PCR analysis. RESULTS: There were 3425 pregnant women, including 2477 ANC subjects and 948 DU subjects who had both microscopic and PCR samples available. Polymerase chain reaction detected significantly more Plasmodium infections than traditional light microscopy both from peripheral (3·4 vs 1·2%; OR 2·9, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) 1·9-4·5) and placental (4·2 vs 1·7%; OR 2·5, 95% CIs 1·4-4·8) blood samples. Submicroscopic infections were not associated with anemia or severe maternal anemia among ANC or DU participants and were not associated with low birth weight (LBW) among DU participants. In contrast, microscopically detected infections were associated with severe anemia and LBW. CONCLUSIONS: In this area of unstable malarial transmission from India, submicroscopic infections did not identify a set of pregnant women at increased risk for anemia or LBW. Until PCR techniques become much less expensive and available as a point of care test for the field setting, its use will be limited for malarial detection.
BACKGROUND: Conventional microscopy underestimates the burden of malarial infection when compared with molecular diagnosis using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods. Lower density parasitemias serve as a reservoir for infection. We evaluated the prevalence of submicroscopic infections in an area of unstable malarial transmission in India and determined whether these infections negatively impacted maternal or fetal outcomes. METHODS: This cross-sectional study (2007-2008) was undertaken in two districts of Chhattisgarh, recruiting women from both antenatal clinics (ANCs) and delivery units (DUs). For ANC/DU subjects, peripheral/placental blood, respectively, was obtained for conventional microscopy and collected onto filter paper for PCR analysis. RESULTS: There were 3425 pregnant women, including 2477 ANC subjects and 948 DU subjects who had both microscopic and PCR samples available. Polymerase chain reaction detected significantly more Plasmodium infections than traditional light microscopy both from peripheral (3·4 vs 1·2%; OR 2·9, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) 1·9-4·5) and placental (4·2 vs 1·7%; OR 2·5, 95% CIs 1·4-4·8) blood samples. Submicroscopic infections were not associated with anemia or severe maternal anemia among ANC or DU participants and were not associated with low birth weight (LBW) among DU participants. In contrast, microscopically detected infections were associated with severe anemia and LBW. CONCLUSIONS: In this area of unstable malarial transmission from India, submicroscopic infections did not identify a set of pregnant women at increased risk for anemia or LBW. Until PCR techniques become much less expensive and available as a point of care test for the field setting, its use will be limited for malarial detection.
Authors: Hayder A Giha; Ishraga E A-Elbasit; Thoraya M E A-Elgadir; Ishag Adam; Klavs Berzins; Gehad Elghazali; Mustafa I Elbashir Journal: Microbes Infect Date: 2005 Aug-Sep Impact factor: 2.700
Authors: F P Mockenhaupt; B Rong; H Till; T A Eggelte; S Beck; C Gyasi-Sarpong; W N Thompson; U Bienzle Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Anne-Maria Rantala; Steve M Taylor; Paul A Trottman; Mari Luntamo; Bernard Mbewe; Kenneth Maleta; Teija Kulmala; Per Ashorn; Steven R Meshnick Journal: Malar J Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: K C Kain; D E Kyle; C Wongsrichanalai; A E Brown; H K Webster; S Vanijanonta; S Looareesuwan Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Anna Maria van Eijk; Patrick L Sutton; Lalitha Ramanathapuram; Steven A Sullivan; Deena Kanagaraj; G Sri Lakshmi Priya; Sangamithra Ravishankaran; Aswin Asokan; V Sangeetha; Pavitra N Rao; Samuel C Wassmer; Nikunj Tandel; Ankita Patel; Nisha Desai; Sandhya Choubey; Syed Zeeshan Ali; Punam Barla; Rajashri Rani Oraon; Stuti Mohanty; Shobhna Mishra; Sonal Kale; Nabamita Bandyopadhyay; Prashant K Mallick; Jonathan Huck; Neena Valecha; Om P Singh; K Pradhan; Ranvir Singh; S K Sharma; Harish C Srivastava; Jane M Carlton; Alex Eapen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: John E Williams; Matthew Cairns; Fanta Njie; Stephen Laryea Quaye; Timothy Awine; Abraham Oduro; Harry Tagbor; Kalifa Bojang; Pascal Magnussen; Feiko O Ter Kuile; Arouna Woukeu; Paul Milligan; Daniel Chandramohan; Brian Greenwood Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Neha Chaturvedi; Sri Krishna; Praveen K Bharti; Deepak Gaur; Virander S Chauhan; Neeru Singh Journal: Indian J Med Res Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Samia A Omer; Ali N Noureldein; Hadeel Eisa; Mutasim Abdelrahim; Hagir E Idress; Abdelrahim M Abdelrazig; Ishag Adam Journal: J Trop Med Date: 2019-08-07
Authors: Rukhsana Ahmed; Jeanne R Poespoprodjo; Din Syafruddin; Carole Khairallah; Cheryl Pace; Theda Lukito; Sylvia S Maratina; Puji B S Asih; Maria A Santana-Morales; Emily R Adams; Vera T Unwin; Christopher T Williams; Tao Chen; James Smedley; Duolao Wang; Brian Faragher; Richard N Price; Feiko O Ter Kuile Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 71.421