Chantal Julia1, Caroline Méjean1, Florence Vicari1, Sandrine Péneau1, Serge Hercberg1. 1. 1Université Paris 13,Sorbonne Paris Cité,Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle (EREN),Centre d'Epidémiologie et Biostatistiques,Inserm,Inra,Cnam,74 rue Marcel Cachin,F-93017 Bobigny Cedex,France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In France, an excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages was introduced on 1 January 2012. Our objective was to assess perception of this tax as well as the sociodemographic characteristics of its supporters and opponents. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study within the Nutrinet-Santé cohort. A sub-sample of 1996 individuals was selected among participants in the Nutrinet-Santé cohort study. Perceptions of the sugar-sweetened beverage tax were assessed via self-administered questionnaires. The sociodemographic and dietary profiles of supporters and opponents of this tax were explored by multinomial logistic regression. Setting Nationally representative French sample, 2012. SUBJECTS: Adults aged >18 years (largest sample n 1996). RESULTS: Half of the study sample was generally supportive of the tax and 57·7 % perceived it as helpful in improving population health. Participants were more likely to support the tax model if the revenue it generated would be used for health-care system improvement (72·7 %) and if such taxing was associated with a corresponding decrease in the prices of other foodstuffs (71·5 %). Older participants were more likely to support the tax than were their younger counterparts (OR=2·37; 95 % CI 1·60, 3·49 for >65 years v. 26-45 years; P<0·001). Participants with lower educational levels were less likely to support the tax than were those with more formal education (OR=0·31; 95 % CI 0·19, 0·52 for low educational level v. high education level; P<0·001). In our models, sugar-sweetened beverage consumption was not associated with tax perception. CONCLUSIONS: The French sugar-sweetened beverage tax appeared to be favourably perceived by the public. Sociodemographic factors modulated such perceptions and should thus be taken into consideration when drafting future public health measures.
OBJECTIVE: In France, an excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages was introduced on 1 January 2012. Our objective was to assess perception of this tax as well as the sociodemographic characteristics of its supporters and opponents. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study within the Nutrinet-Santé cohort. A sub-sample of 1996 individuals was selected among participants in the Nutrinet-Santé cohort study. Perceptions of the sugar-sweetened beverage tax were assessed via self-administered questionnaires. The sociodemographic and dietary profiles of supporters and opponents of this tax were explored by multinomial logistic regression. Setting Nationally representative French sample, 2012. SUBJECTS: Adults aged >18 years (largest sample n 1996). RESULTS: Half of the study sample was generally supportive of the tax and 57·7 % perceived it as helpful in improving population health. Participants were more likely to support the tax model if the revenue it generated would be used for health-care system improvement (72·7 %) and if such taxing was associated with a corresponding decrease in the prices of other foodstuffs (71·5 %). Older participants were more likely to support the tax than were their younger counterparts (OR=2·37; 95 % CI 1·60, 3·49 for >65 years v. 26-45 years; P<0·001). Participants with lower educational levels were less likely to support the tax than were those with more formal education (OR=0·31; 95 % CI 0·19, 0·52 for low educational level v. high education level; P<0·001). In our models, sugar-sweetened beverage consumption was not associated with tax perception. CONCLUSIONS: The French sugar-sweetened beverage tax appeared to be favourably perceived by the public. Sociodemographic factors modulated such perceptions and should thus be taken into consideration when drafting future public health measures.
Authors: Vanessa M Oddo; Melissa A Knox; Lina Pinero Walkinshaw; Brian E Saelens; Nadine Chan; Jessica C Jones-Smith Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2022-04-30
Authors: Michelle Eykelenboom; Maartje M van Stralen; Margreet R Olthof; Carry M Renders; Ingrid Hm Steenhuis Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Maria Carolina Borges; Maria Laura Louzada; Thiago Hérick de Sá; Anthony A Laverty; Diana C Parra; Josefa Maria Fellegger Garzillo; Carlos Augusto Monteiro; Christopher Millett Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Caroline L Miller; Joanne Dono; Melanie A Wakefield; Simone Pettigrew; John Coveney; David Roder; Sarah J Durkin; Gary Wittert; Jane Martin; Kerry A Ettridge Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 2.692