Literature DB >> 25627288

Longer plate-to-disc distance prevents adjacent-level ossification development but does not influence adjacent-segment degeneration.

Haisong Yang1, Xuhua Lu, Hailong He, Wen Yuan, Xinwei Wang, Xinyuan Liao, Deyu Chen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the association between plate-to-disc distance (PDD) and adjacent-level ossification development (ALOD) and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating provides higher fusion rate and improved alignment but has been reported to result in ALOD and ASD.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 218 patients with solid fusion after anterior cervical arthrodesis with plating at our institution between January 2004 and December 2010. PDD was measured on postoperative lateral radiographs for each adjacent disc space and used to assign patients to 1 of 3 groups: group L, long PDD (>5 mm); group S, short PDD (0 mm ≤PDD ≤5 mm); and group N, PDD (<0 mm, disk space encroachment). Mean follow-up was 5.3 years. Incidences of cranial and caudal ALOD and ASD with and without symptoms were compared among groups. Severity of caudal ossification was not measured in 30 patients because bony overlap precluded adequate visualization of the caudal level.
RESULTS: Ossification developed in 134 (61%) of 218 cranial adjacent disc spaces and 45 (24%) of 188 caudal adjacent disc spaces (P < 0.01). Mean cranial PDD was shorter than mean caudal PDD (P < 0.01). Ossification rate was higher in group N than in group S at the cranial adjacent disc spaces (100% vs. 66%, P < 0.01). Incidences of both cranial and caudal ALOD were significantly higher in group S than in group L (66% vs. 31%, P < 0.01; and 31% vs. 13%, P < 0.01, respectively). No significant differences in symptomatic and asymptomatic ASD were seen among groups.
CONCLUSION: Longer PDD does not decrease the incidence of ASD but it can prevent ALOD. We now attempt to place anterior cervical plates of 5 mm or greater from adjacent disc spaces. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25627288     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  Biomechanical effect of different plate-to-disc distance on surgical and adjacent segment in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion - a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Xing Guo; Jiaming Zhou; Yueyang Tian; Liang Kang; Yuan Xue
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  The Effect of Plating on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusions in Patients with Degenerative Spine Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Johan L Heemskerk; Carlos Perez Vega; Ricardo A Domingo; Kent R Richter; Reed Richter; Tito G Vivas-Buitrago; Matthew T Neal; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Kingsley Abode-Iyamah
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-27

Review 3.  Adjacent Segment Pathology after Anterior Cervical Fusion.

Authors:  Jae Yoon Chung; Jong-Beom Park; Hyoung-Yeon Seo; Sung Kyu Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-06-16

4.  In-Depth Analysis on Influencing Factors of Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Cervical Fusion.

Authors:  Chaojie Yu; Xiaoping Mu; Jianxun Wei; Ye Chu; Bin Liang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-12-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.