Literature DB >> 25627139

The rise of big clinical databases.

J A Cook1, G S Collins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The routine collection of large amounts of clinical data, 'big data', is becoming more common, as are research studies that make use of these data source. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the uses of data from large multi-institution clinical databases for research.
METHODS: This article considers the potential benefits, the types of data source, and the use to which the data is put. Additionally, the main challenges associated with using these data sources for research purposes are considered.
RESULTS: Common uses of the data include: providing population characteristics; identifying risk factors and developing prediction (diagnostic or prognostic) models; observational studies comparing different interventions; exploring variation between healthcare providers; and as a supplementary source of data for another study. The main advantages of using such big data sources are their comprehensive nature, the relatively large number of patients they comprise, and the ability to compare healthcare providers. The main challenges are demonstrating data quality and confidently applying a causal interpretation to the study findings.
CONCLUSION: Large clinical database research studies are becoming ubiquitous and offer a number of potential benefits. However, the limitations of such data sources must not be overlooked; each research study needs to be considered carefully in its own right, together with the justification for using the data for that specific purpose.
© 2015 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25627139     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  41 in total

1.  Do Diagnostic and Procedure Codes Within Population-Based, Administrative Datasets Accurately Identify Patients with Rectal Cancer?

Authors:  Reilly P Musselman; Tara Gomes; Deanna M Rothwell; Rebecca C Auer; Husein Moloo; Robin P Boushey; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis - insights from real-world observational studies.

Authors:  Maria Trojano; Mar Tintore; Xavier Montalban; Jan Hillert; Tomas Kalincik; Pietro Iaffaldano; Tim Spelman; Maria Pia Sormani; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 3.  Advancing computer-aided drug discovery (CADD) by big data and data-driven machine learning modeling.

Authors:  Linlin Zhao; Heather L Ciallella; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 4.  Outcomes after bariatric surgery according to large databases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea Balla; Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Balagué; Sonia Fernández-Ananín; Eduard M Targarona
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Evaluation of Healthcare Interventions and Big Data: Review of Associated Data Issues.

Authors:  Carl V Asche; Brian Seal; Kristijan H Kahler; Elisabeth M Oehrlein; Meredith Greer Baumgartner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Assessing the quality of clinical and administrative data extracted from hospitals: the General Medicine Inpatient Initiative (GEMINI) experience.

Authors:  Amol A Verma; Sachin V Pasricha; Hae Young Jung; Vladyslav Kushnir; Denise Y F Mak; Radha Koppula; Yishan Guo; Janice L Kwan; Lauren Lapointe-Shaw; Shail Rawal; Terence Tang; Adina Weinerman; Fahad Razak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Andrea Balla; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Martinez; Pilar Hernández; Jesús Bollo; Eduard M Targarona
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Low Concordance of Patient-Reported Outcomes With Clinical and Clinical Trial Documentation.

Authors:  Charlene M Fares; Timothy J Williamson; Matthew K Theisen; Amy Cummings; Krikor Bornazyan; James Carroll; Marshall L Spiegel; Annette L Stanton; Edward B Garon
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

9.  Demographic and epidemiologic characterization of transfusion recipients from four US regions: evidence from the REDS-III recipient database.

Authors:  Matthew S Karafin; Roberta Bruhn; Matt Westlake; Marian T Sullivan; Walter Bialkowski; Gustaf Edgren; Nareg H Roubinian; Ronald G Hauser; Daryl J Kor; Debra Fleischmann; Jerome L Gottschall; Edward L Murphy; Darrell J Triulzi
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Ulnar Neck Fractures Associated with Distal Radius Fractures.

Authors:  Sezai Özkan; Stefan F Fischerauer; Thomas J M Kootstra; Femke M A P Claessen; David Ring
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2017-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.