Literature DB >> 25627076

The effect of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on renal function, arterial blood pressure, and vasoactive hormones during radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Anne Sophie Pinholt Kancir1, Joergen Kühlwein Johansen, Niels Peter Ekeloef, Erling Bjerregaard Pedersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is commonly used as an intravascular volume expander in surgical patients, recent studies suggest that it may increase the risk of renal failure in critically ill patients. We hypothesized that patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and receiving HES would be more likely to develop markers of renal failure, such as increasing urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (u-NGAL), creatinine clearance (C(crea)), and decreasing urine output (UO).
METHODS: In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, 40 patients referred for radical prostatectomy received either 6% HES 130/0.4 or saline 0.9%; 7.5 mL/kg during the first hour of surgery and 5 mL/kg in the following hours; u-NGAL, urine albumin, C(crea), UO, arterial blood pressure, and plasma concentrations of creatinine, renin, angiotensin II, aldosterone, and vasopressin were measured before, during, and after surgery.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients completed the study. u-NGAL, C(crea), UO, plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, p-creatinine, urine albumin, and arterial blood pressure were the same in both groups. Blood loss was higher in the HES group (HES 1250 vs saline 750 mL), while p-albumin was reduced to a significantly lower level. P-renin and p-angiotensin-II increased in both groups, whereas p-aldosterone and p-vasopressin increased significantly in the saline group.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of nephrotoxicity after infusion of 6% HES 130/0.4 in patients undergoing prostatectomy with normal preoperative renal function. Hemodynamic stability and infused fluid volume were the same in both groups. We observed an increased blood loss in the group given 6% HES 130/0.4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25627076     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  10 in total

Review 1.  Intravenous Fluid of Choice in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Seechad Noonpradej; Osaree Akaraborworn
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2020-08-03

Review 2.  Fluid management in living donor hepatectomy: Recent issues and perspectives.

Authors:  Seong-Soo Choi; Sung-Hoon Kim; Young-Kug Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Hydroxyethyl starch for volume expansion after subarachnoid haemorrhage and renal function: Results of a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Sven Bercker; Tanja Winkelmann; Thilo Busch; Sven Laudi; Dirk Lindner; Jürgen Meixensberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Balanced 10% hydroxyethyl starch compared with balanced 6% hydroxyethyl starch and balanced crystalloid using a goal-directed hemodynamic algorithm in pancreatic surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Julia Werner; Oliver Hunsicker; Anja Schneider; Henryk Stein; Christian von Heymann; Adrian Freitag; Aarne Feldheiser; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Claudia Spies
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Risk of early postoperative acute kidney injury with stroke volume variation-guided tetrastarch versus Ringer's lactate.

Authors:  Asha Tyagi; Gaurav Verma; Ankit Luthra; Shubham Lahan; Shukla Das; Gargi Rai; Ashok Kumar Sethi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

6.  Renal Morbidity of 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 in 9000 Propensity Score Matched Pairs of Surgical Patients.

Authors:  Hideki Miyao; Yoshifumi Kotake
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Impact of perioperative administration of 6 % hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on serum cystatin C-derived renal function after radical prostatectomy: a single-centre retrospective study.

Authors:  Stefan Südfeld; Sami R Leyh-Bannurah; Lars Budäus; Markus Graefen; Philip C Reese; Franziska von Breunig; Daniel A Reuter; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Is the literature inconclusive about the harm from HES? No.

Authors:  Christian J Wiedermann; Rinaldo Bellomo; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Colloids Yes or No? - a "Gretchen Question" Answered.

Authors:  Katja-Nicole Adamik; Ivayla D Yozova
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-07-02

10.  Hemodynamic, renal and hormonal effects of lung protective ventilation during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, analysis of secondary outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sidse Høyer; Frank H Mose; Peter Ekeløf; Jørgen B Jensen; Jesper N Bech
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 2.217

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.