Literature DB >> 25626910

Vitrectomy combined with endolaser or an encircling scleral buckle in primary retinal detachment surgery: a pilot study.

Christiane I Falkner-Radler1, Alexandra Graf2, Susanne Binder1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare pars plana vitrectomy and 360° endolaser therapy with pars plana vitrectomy and an encircling scleral buckle for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in a randomized pilot study including 60 patients.
METHODS: Main outcome measures were single-surgery anatomic success rate and final best-corrected visual acuity at 6 months follow-up. Cofactors analysed were complication rates, patients' comfort, refractive outcome and macula status assessed using a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
RESULTS: With differences between both treatment groups regarding type of the retinal detachment, localization of retinal tears (p = 0.0085) and the choice of the intraocular tamponade (p < 0.0202), there were no significant differences between the single-surgery anatomic success rate (93.33% both groups, p = 1.0) and the visual acuity at final follow-up (≤0.3 logMAR [logarithm of minimum angle of resolution] in 66.67% in the endolaser group versus 40.0% in the scleral buckle group, p = 0.0514). Questionnaire responses showed lower levels of patients' discomfort in the endolaser group. A significant difference between both groups was found in the refractive error change after surgery (-0.20 ± 0.51 dioptres in the endolaser group versus -0.88 ± 0.88 dioptres in the scleral buckle group, p = 0.0003).
CONCLUSION: Primary vitrectomy combined with 360° endolaser therapy seems to be as effective as vitrectomy combined with an encircling scleral buckle in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, with possible benefits of an improved patients' comfort and a more stable refractive status after surgery.
© 2015 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  encircling band; endolaser; pars plana vitrectomy; primary retinal detachment surgery; rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; scleral buckling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25626910     DOI: 10.1111/aos.12663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  4 in total

1.  Vitrectomy with scleral buckling versus with inferior retinectomy in treating primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with PVR and inferior breaks.

Authors:  Khaled G Abu Eleinen; Ahmed A Mohalhal; Dalia A Ghalwash; Ahmed A Abdel-Kader; Ahmed A Ghalwash; Islam A Mohalhal; Abdussalam M Abdullatif
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear.

Authors:  Mario Gutierrez; Jose L Rodriguez; Diego Zamora-de La Cruz; Mariana Aracely Flores Pimentel; Aida Jimenez-Corona; Linda C Novak; Rene Cano Hidalgo; Federico Graue
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-16

3.  360-Degree laser retinopexy in primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: factors associated with its use and impact on surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew C Peters; Alexander Murray-Douglass; Joseph Park; Sean S H Cheng; Anil K Sharma; Abhishek Sharma; Kevin W Vandeleur; Lawrence R Lee; Thomas P Moloney
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2022-04-06

4.  Protective Role of 360° Laser Retinopexy in Patients with Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christa Soekamto; Edward R Chu; Daniel A Johnson; Jeong-Hyeon Sohn; Sepehr Bahadorani
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.