Literature DB >> 25626890

Quantifying the role of online news in linking conservation research to Facebook and Twitter.

S K Papworth1, T P L Nghiem2, D Chimalakonda2, M R C Posa2, L S Wijedasa3, D Bickford2, L R Carrasco2.   

Abstract

Conservation science needs to engage the general public to ensure successful conservation interventions. Although online technologies such as Twitter and Facebook offer new opportunities to accelerate communication between conservation scientists and the online public, factors influencing the spread of conservation news in online media are not well understood. We explored transmission of conservation research through online news articles with generalized linear mixed-effects models and an information theoretic approach. In particular, we assessed differences in the frequency conservation research is featured on online news sites and the impact of online conservation news content and delivery on Facebook likes and shares and Twitter tweets. Five percent of articles in conservation journals are reported in online news, and the probability of reporting depended on the journal. There was weak evidence that articles on climate change and mammals were more likely to be featured. Online news articles about charismatic mammals with illustrations were more likely to be shared or liked on Facebook and Twitter, but the effect of news sites was much larger. These results suggest journals have the greatest impact on which conservation research is featured and that news site has the greatest impact on how popular an online article will be on Facebook and Twitter.
© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  Almetric.com; Facebook; Twitter; Twittter; ciencia de la comunicación; medios sociales; noticias en línea; online news; science communication; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25626890     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  6 in total

1.  Environmental Discourse Exhibits Consistency and Variation across Spatial Scales on Twitter.

Authors:  Charlotte H Chang; Paul R Armsworth; Yuta J Masuda
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 11.566

2.  Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation.

Authors:  Clayton T Lamb; Sophie L Gilbert; Adam T Ford
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Analysis of the Capacity of Google Trends to Measure Interest in Conservation Topics and the Role of Online News.

Authors:  Le T P Nghiem; Sarah K Papworth; Felix K S Lim; Luis R Carrasco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Data mining in conservation research using Latin and vernacular species names.

Authors:  Ivan Jarić; Franck Courchamp; Jörn Gessner; David L Roberts
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Academic information on Twitter: A user survey.

Authors:  Ehsan Mohammadi; Mike Thelwall; Mary Kwasny; Kristi L Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media.

Authors:  Curtis Martin; Bertrum H MacDonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.