Luís Eduardo Silva Soares1, Antonio Carlos Belfort De Carvalho Filho. 1. Dental Materials and Operative Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Research and Development Institute, IP&D, Laboratory of Biomedical Vibrational Spectroscopy, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba, UNIVAP, LEVB, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The effects of fluoride treatment on bovine enamel subjected to acid erosion were studied by roughness (Ra) measurements, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and microenergy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (μ-EDXRF). MATERIALS AND METHOD: Enamel samples (63) were divided into nine groups (n = 7): artificial saliva (AS), Pepsi Twist(®) (PT), orange juice (OJ), Duraphat(®) + Pepsi Twist(®) (DPH/PT), Duraphat(®) + orange juice (DPH/OJ), Duofluorid(®) + Pepsi Twist(®) (DUO/PT), Duofluorid(®) + orange juice (DUO/OJ), fluoride gel + Pepsi Twist(®) (FG/PT), and fluoride gel + orange juice (FG/OJ). Fluoride was applied and the samples were submitted to six cycles (demineralization: Pepsi Twist(®) or orange juice, 10 min; remineralization: saliva, 1 h). The enamel surface in depth was exposed and 63 line-scan maps were performed. RESULTS: The elemental analysis by EDS revealed that only fluoride treated groups had any detectable fluorine after erosion cycles (DPH/PT: 3.50 wt%; DPH/OJ: 3.37 wt%; DUO/PT: 2.69 wt%; DUO/OJ: 3.54 wt%; FG/PT: 2.17 wt%; FG/OJ: 2.77 wt%). PT treatment resulted in significantly higher Ra values than the artificial saliva (P < 0.001). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of fluoride protected enamel showed areas with some globular structures or a residual layer of varnish. The enamel thickness was significantly lower in PT (0.63 ± 0.087 mm) than in DPH/PT (0.87 ± 0.16 mm) and DUO/PT (0.92 ± 0.14 mm) groups (P < 0.01). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fluoride treatments protected enamel without Ra increase and loss of enamel tissue.
OBJECTIVES: The effects of fluoride treatment on bovine enamel subjected to acid erosion were studied by roughness (Ra) measurements, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and microenergy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (μ-EDXRF). MATERIALS AND METHOD: Enamel samples (63) were divided into nine groups (n = 7): artificial saliva (AS), Pepsi Twist(®) (PT), orange juice (OJ), Duraphat(®) + Pepsi Twist(®) (DPH/PT), Duraphat(®) + orange juice (DPH/OJ), Duofluorid(®) + Pepsi Twist(®) (DUO/PT), Duofluorid(®) + orange juice (DUO/OJ), fluoride gel + Pepsi Twist(®) (FG/PT), and fluoride gel + orange juice (FG/OJ). Fluoride was applied and the samples were submitted to six cycles (demineralization: Pepsi Twist(®) or orange juice, 10 min; remineralization: saliva, 1 h). The enamel surface in depth was exposed and 63 line-scan maps were performed. RESULTS: The elemental analysis by EDS revealed that only fluoride treated groups had any detectable fluorine after erosion cycles (DPH/PT: 3.50 wt%; DPH/OJ: 3.37 wt%; DUO/PT: 2.69 wt%; DUO/OJ: 3.54 wt%; FG/PT: 2.17 wt%; FG/OJ: 2.77 wt%). PT treatment resulted in significantly higher Ra values than the artificial saliva (P < 0.001). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of fluoride protected enamel showed areas with some globular structures or a residual layer of varnish. The enamel thickness was significantly lower in PT (0.63 ± 0.087 mm) than in DPH/PT (0.87 ± 0.16 mm) and DUO/PT (0.92 ± 0.14 mm) groups (P < 0.01). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fluoride treatments protected enamel without Ra increase and loss of enamel tissue.
Authors: Raimundo Nonato Silva Gomes; Tanmoy T Bhattacharjee; Luis Felipe C S Carvalho; Luís Eduardo Silva Soares Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2017-09-23 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Thiago I Vieira; Adílis K Alexandria; Jaqueline C V Menezes; Lilian H do Amaral; Thaís M P Dos Santos; Aline de A Neves; Ricardo T Lopes; Lúcio M Cabral; Ana M G Valença; Lucianne C Maia Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 3.573