Literature DB >> 25626674

Fast profiling of protease specificity reveals similar substrate specificities for cathepsins K, L and S.

Matej Vizovišek1,2,3, Robert Vidmar1,3, Emmy Van Quickelberghe4,5, Francis Impens4,5,6, Uroš Andjelković7, Barbara Sobotič1,3, Veronika Stoka1, Kris Gevaert4,5, Boris Turk1,2,8, Marko Fonović1,2.   

Abstract

Proteases are important effectors of numerous physiological and pathological processes. Reliable determination of a protease's specificity is crucial to understand protease function and to develop activity-based probes and inhibitors. During the last decade, various proteomic approaches for profiling protease substrate specificities were reported. Although most of these approaches can identify up to thousands of substrate cleavage events in a single experiment, they are often time consuming and methodologically challenging as some of these approaches require rather complex sample preparation procedures. For such reasons their application is often limited to those labs that initially introduced them. Here, we report on a fast and simple approach for proteomic profiling of protease specificities (fast profiling of protease specificity (FPPS)), which can be applied to complex protein mixtures. FPPS is based on trideutero-acetylation of novel N-termini generated by the action of proteases and subsequent peptide fractionation on Stage Tips containing ion-exchange and reverse phase chromatographic resins. FPPS can be performed in 2 days and does not require extensive fractionation steps. Using this approach, we have determined the specificity profiles of the cysteine cathepsins K, L and S. We further validated our method by comparing the results with the specificity profiles obtained by the N-terminal combined fractional diagonal chromatography method. This comparison pointed to almost identical substrate specificities for all three cathepsins and confirmed the reliability of the FPPS approach. All MS data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange with identifiers PXD001536 and PXD001553 (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/dataset/PXD001536; http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/dataset/PXD001553).
© 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cathepsin protease specificity; Intact protein-based cleavage site discovery; N-terminomics; Technology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25626674     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  21 in total

1.  Protease cleavage site fingerprinting by label-free in-gel degradomics reveals pH-dependent specificity switch of legumain.

Authors:  Robert Vidmar; Matej Vizovišek; Dušan Turk; Boris Turk; Marko Fonović
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Identification of Protease Specificity by Combining Proteome-Derived Peptide Libraries and Quantitative Proteomics.

Authors:  Martin L Biniossek; Melanie Niemer; Ken Maksimchuk; Bettina Mayer; Julian Fuchs; Pitter F Huesgen; Dewey G McCafferty; Boris Turk; Guenther Fritz; Jens Mayer; Georg Haecker; Lukas Mach; Oliver Schilling
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 3.  Global substrate specificity profiling of post-translational modifying enzymes.

Authors:  Sam L Ivry; Nicole O Meyer; Michael B Winter; Markus F Bohn; Giselle M Knudsen; Anthony J O'Donoghue; Charles S Craik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Cathepsin Protease Controls Copper and Cisplatin Accumulation via Cleavage of the Ctr1 Metal-binding Ectodomain.

Authors:  Helena Öhrvik; Brandon Logeman; Boris Turk; Thomas Reinheckel; Dennis J Thiele
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Molecular probes for selective detection of cysteine cathepsins.

Authors:  Kelton A Schleyer; Lina Cui
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.890

6.  Computational investigation of conformational variability and allostery in cathepsin K and other related peptidases.

Authors:  Marko Novinec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Cysteine Cathepsins and their Extracellular Roles: Shaping the Microenvironment.

Authors:  Eva Vidak; Urban Javoršek; Matej Vizovišek; Boris Turk
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 8.  Biguanide is a modifiable pharmacophore for recruitment of endogenous Zn2+ to inhibit cysteinyl cathepsins: review and implications.

Authors:  Thomas D Lockwood
Journal:  Biometals       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.949

9.  The Unusual Resistance of Avian Defensin AvBD7 to Proteolytic Enzymes Preserves Its Antibacterial Activity.

Authors:  Geoffrey Bailleul; Amanda Kravtzoff; Alix Joulin-Giet; Fabien Lecaille; Valérie Labas; Hervé Meudal; Karine Loth; Ana-Paula Teixeira-Gomes; Florence B Gilbert; Laurent Coquet; Thierry Jouenne; Dieter Brömme; Catherine Schouler; Céline Landon; Gilles Lalmanach; Anne-Christine Lalmanach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Selective imaging of cathepsin L in breast cancer by fluorescent activity-based probes.

Authors:  Marcin Poreba; Wioletta Rut; Matej Vizovisek; Katarzyna Groborz; Paulina Kasperkiewicz; Darren Finlay; Kristiina Vuori; Dusan Turk; Boris Turk; Guy S Salvesen; Marcin Drag
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.