Literature DB >> 25625758

Intratumoral genome diversity parallels progression and predicts outcome in pediatric cancer.

Linda Holmquist Mengelbier1, Jenny Karlsson1, David Lindgren2, Anders Valind1, Henrik Lilljebjörn1, Caroline Jansson1, Daniel Bexell2, Noémie Braekeveldt2, Adam Ameur3, Tord Jonson1, Hanna Göransson Kultima4, Anders Isaksson4, Jurate Asmundsson5, Rogier Versteeg6, Marianne Rissler1, Thoas Fioretos1, Bengt Sandstedt7, Anna Börjesson8, Torbjörn Backman8, Niklas Pal9, Ingrid Øra8, Markus Mayrhofer4, David Gisselsson10.   

Abstract

Genetic differences among neoplastic cells within the same tumour have been proposed to drive cancer progression and treatment failure. Whether data on intratumoral diversity can be used to predict clinical outcome remains unclear. We here address this issue by quantifying genetic intratumoral diversity in a set of chemotherapy-treated childhood tumours. By analysis of multiple tumour samples from seven patients we demonstrate intratumoral diversity in all patients analysed after chemotherapy, typically presenting as multiple clones within a single millimetre-sized tumour sample (microdiversity). We show that microdiversity often acts as the foundation for further genome evolution in metastases. In addition, we find that microdiversity predicts poor cancer-specific survival (60%; P=0.009), independent of other risk factors, in a cohort of 44 patients with chemotherapy-treated childhood kidney cancer. Survival was 100% for patients lacking microdiversity. Thus, intratumoral genetic diversity is common in childhood cancers after chemotherapy and may be an important factor behind treatment failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25625758     DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  22 in total

Review 1.  Genomics of adult and pediatric solid tumors.

Authors:  Zahraa Rahal; Farah Abdulhai; Humam Kadara; Raya Saab
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 2.  Liquid biopsies in lung cancer-time to implement research technologies in routine care?

Authors:  Linda Köhn; Mikael Johansson; Kjell Grankvist; Jonas Nilsson
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-07

Review 3.  A population genetics perspective on the determinants of intra-tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  Zheng Hu; Ruping Sun; Christina Curtis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 10.680

Review 4.  Precision medicine for cancer with next-generation functional diagnostics.

Authors:  Adam A Friedman; Anthony Letai; David E Fisher; Keith T Flaherty
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Serine-Threonine Kinase Receptor Associate Protein (STRAP) confers an aggressive phenotype in neuroblastoma via regulation of Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK).

Authors:  Laura V Bownes; Raoud Marayati; Colin H Quinn; Sara C Hutchins; Jerry E Stewart; Joshua C Anderson; Christopher D Willey; Pran K Datta; Elizabeth A Beierle
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Genomic imbalances pinpoint potential oncogenes and tumor suppressors in Wilms tumors.

Authors:  A C V Krepischi; M Maschietto; E N Ferreira; A G Silva; S S Costa; I W da Cunha; B D F Barros; P E Grundy; C Rosenberg; D M Carraro
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 7.  Integrating next-generation sequencing into clinical oncology: strategies, promises and pitfalls.

Authors:  Peter Horak; Stefan Fröhling; Hanno Glimm
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-11-18

8.  Anti-tumor effects of rigosertib in high-risk neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Katarzyna Radke; Karin Hansson; Jonas Sjölund; Magdalena Wolska; Jenny Karlsson; Javanshir Esfandyari; Kristian Pietras; Kristina Aaltonen; David Gisselsson; Daniel Bexell
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Intra-Tumor Genetic Heterogeneity in Wilms Tumor: Clonal Evolution and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  George D Cresswell; John R Apps; Tasnim Chagtai; Borbala Mifsud; Christopher C Bentley; Mariana Maschietto; Sergey D Popov; Mark E Weeks; Øystein E Olsen; Neil J Sebire; Kathy Pritchard-Jones; Nicholas M Luscombe; Richard D Williams; William Mifsud
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 8.143

10.  Cancer Molecular Evolution.

Authors:  David Posada
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.