Literature DB >> 25625260

Propofol anesthesia for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with isoflurane, nitrous oxide, and a laryngeal mask airway.

Christopher Heard1, Michael Harutunians, James Houck, Prashant Joshi, Kristin Johnson, Jerrold Lerman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both propofol infusions with oxygen delivered through nasal cannula and isoflurane/N2O (nitrous oxide) delivered via a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) are used to provide anesthesia for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging scans. We compared the incidence of adverse events and perioperative physiologic responses in children anesthetized with these 2 regimens.
METHODS: One hundred-fifty healthy children, ages 1 to 10 years, were randomized to receive either a propofol infusion (starting at 300 µg kg·min) with oxygen via nasal cannula (n = 75) or isoflurane with 70% N2O in oxygen delivered via an LMA (n = 75), both after a sevoflurane/N2O/oxygen induction. Adverse airway events, as well as hemodynamic, respiratory, and other physiologic responses were recorded during the magnetic resonance imaging scans and in the postanesthesia care unit by a single research nurse who was blind to the treatments. All parents were contacted postoperatively to complete a postanesthetic follow-up.
RESULTS: All 150 children completed their scans. The frequency of all adverse airway events during emergence and recovery after propofol (12%) was significantly less than that after isoflurane/N2O/LMA (49%) (95% confidence interval for the risk difference was 23%-50%) (P = 0.0001). Hemodynamic responses and recovery times for the 2 treatments were similar. Early recovery, defined as the time interval from admission to the postanesthesia care unit until eye opening and wakefulness (modified Aldrete score >5), after propofol was more rapid than that after isoflurane/N2O/LMA (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0012, respectively). No scans had to be repeated.
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of adverse airway events during emergence and recovery after propofol infusion with oxygen by nasal cannula is less than with isoflurane/N2O/LMA in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25625260     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  3 in total

1.  Airway Dimensions in Children with Neurological Disabilities During Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Kamath Sriganesh; Jitender Saini; Kaushik Theerth; Sudhir Venkataramaiah
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-11-27

2.  Timeliness of care and adverse event profile in children undergoing general anesthesia or sedation for MRI: An observational prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Suma Mary Thampi; Riya Jose; Poornima Kothandan; Meghna Jiwanmall; Ekta Rai
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2020-05-30

3.  Propofol use in newborns and children: is it safe? A systematic review.

Authors:  Eduardo Mekitarian Filho; Mariana Barbosa Riechelmann
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.990

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.