| Literature DB >> 25625027 |
Dustin R Osborne1, Shelley Acuff1, Sarah Cruise2, Mumtaz Syed1, Melissa Neveu1, Alan Stuckey1, Yong Bradley1.
Abstract
New developments in PET/CT technology have enabled the commercial availability of continuous bed motion (CBM) acquisition methods. This technology has some potential performance benefits compared to standard step and shoot (SS) imaging, however, this technology has not been assessed with regard to quantitative and image quality parameters compared to traditional SS techniques. This study seeks to compare clinically relevant quantitative and image quality parameters using CBM and SS data collection methods with the intent of providing assistance in making educated decisions regarding imaging protocol development when using CBM technology versus SS imaging.Keywords: CBM; CT; PET; continuous bed motion
Year: 2014 PMID: 25625027 PMCID: PMC4299776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging