Literature DB >> 25624156

Prognostic factors in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases and normal neurological function.

M D Switlyk1, U Kongsgaard2, S Skjeldal3, J K Hald4, K H Hole5, K Knutstad6, O Zaikova3.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate potential prognostic factors for predicting survival after radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases and normal neurological function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 173 patients were included. The following prognostic factors were assessed: primary cancer site, age, gender, albumin and haemoglobin levels, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), analgesic use, pain intensity, number of extraspinal bone metastases and visceral metastases, presence of tumour-conditioned spinal canal stenosis and metastatic spinal cord compression, and extension of spinal metastatic disease on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ongoing systemic treatment, use of bisphosphonates and response to radiotherapy were also evaluated. A simple scoring system for predicting survival was used.
RESULTS: The following predictive factors were found to be significant in multivariate analysis: primary cancer site, KPS, albumin level, number of visceral metastases and analgesic use. Three survival groups were proposed. The overall survival probabilities for groups 1-3 were 13, 46 and 94% at 6 months; 4, 28 and 79% at 12 months, respectively. The median survival times for groups 1-3 were 2.1, 5.5 and 24.9 months, respectively (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The pretreatment albumin level was a significant prognostic indicator for survival. Similarly, the primary cancer site, KPS and number of visceral metastases were associated with survival; these findings were consistent with the results of previous studies. The pretreatment analgesic use was significant using the univariate and multivariate analyses and this factor can be verified in future trials. Self-reported pain intensity, pain response to radiotherapy and MRI findings did not influence survival times.
Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; radiotherapy; spinal metastases; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25624156     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  5 in total

1.  Epidural extension of vertebral metastases is not an independent predictor of prognosis after therapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Federico Ampil; Kent Broussard; Moiz Vora
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Evaluation of the Metastatic Spine Disease Multidisciplinary Working Group Algorithms as Part of a Multidisciplinary Spine Tumor Conference.

Authors:  Soumon Rudra; Mary K Lauman; Hayley Stowe; Lauren E Henke; Adam N Wallace; Michael C Roach; Jiayi Huang; Christina I Tsien; Jeffrey D Bradley; Paul Santiago; Jacob M Buchowski; Jack W Jennings; Clifford G Robinson
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-10-16

3.  Prognostic Differences in Patients with Solitary and Multiple Spinal Metastases.

Authors:  Deng-Xing Lun; Li-Na Xu; Feng Wang; Xiong-Gang Yang; Xiu-Chun Yu; Guo-Chuan Zhang; Yong-Cheng Hu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 4.  Classification and scoring systems for metastatic spine tumors: a literature review.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Hiroshi Uei; Masashi Oshima
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-20

5.  Survival and prognostic factors in patients with stable and unstable spinal bone metastases from solid tumors: a retrospective analysis of 915 cases.

Authors:  Robert J Wolf; Robert Foerster; Thomas Bruckner; Tilman Bostel; Ingmar Schlampp; Juergen Debus; Harald Rief; German Bone Research Group
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.