Literature DB >> 25624075

Imaging during low back pain ED visits: a claims-based descriptive analysis.

Erin Schlemmer1, James C Mitchiner2, Michael Brown3, Elizabeth Wasilevich4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Low back pain (LBP) is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits. This study aimed to determine the frequency and type of nonindicated imaging during LBP ED visits and to describe demographic and prior health care use characteristics among the nonindicated population.
METHODS: This study included index ED events for LBP occurring during 2011 through 2012 for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan commercial members ages 18 to 64 years. We identified LBP imaging indications within 12 months before the index event. Frequency estimates of patient demographics, imaging prevalence, type of imaging, and prior health care use characteristics stratified by imaging and indication status are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: Of the 14838 total events, 51.9% (95% CI, 51.1%-52.7%) did not have indications for imaging. Patients without imaging indications were less likely to have had ED visits, hospital stays, LBP, lower back imaging, primary care physician visits, and back-related specialist visits in the past year compared with patients with indications. Among nonindicated patients, 30.1% (95% CI, 29.1%-31.1%) received imaging; of these, 26.2% received advanced imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). Nonindicated patients who received imaging were slightly older than those who did not receive imaging (27.6% [95% CI, 25.8%-29.4%] were ages 55-64 years vs 20.6% [95% CI, 19.6%-21.7%]) and had a higher prevalence of observation/treatment room use (7.3% [95% CI, 6.2%-8.4%] vs 1.2% [95% CI, 0.9%-1.4%]).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a substantial proportion of the patient population presenting to the ED for LBP receives nonindicated imaging, revealing opportunities to reduce costs and radiation exposure.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25624075     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.12.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  7 in total

Review 1.  The role of radiography in the study of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini; Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Daniel López Zúñiga
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-12

Review 2.  Defining and measuring imaging appropriateness in low back pain studies: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mark Yates; Crystian B Oliveira; James B Galloway; Chris G Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Guideline-concordant utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in adults receiving chiropractic manipulative therapy vs other care for radicular low back pain: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Robert J Trager; Brian R Anderson; Regina M Casselberry; Jaime A Perez; Jeffery A Dusek
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  A prospective study of patients with low back pain attending a Canadian emergency department: Why they came and what happened?

Authors:  Gregory N Kawchuk; Jacob Aaskov; Matthew Mohler; Justin Lowes; Maureen Kruhlak; Stephanie Couperthwaite; Esther H Yang; Cristina Villa-Roel; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  What do we really know about the appropriateness of radiation emitting imaging for low back pain in primary and emergency care? A systematic review and meta-analysis of medical record reviews.

Authors:  Gabrielle S Logan; Andrea Pike; Bethan Copsey; Patrick Parfrey; Holly Etchegary; Amanda Hall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Are Emergency Medicine Provider Characteristics Associated With Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain?

Authors:  Jonathan Doucett; Jill Hayden; Kirk D Magee; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 7.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.