Jennifer L Steiner1, Charles H Lang. 1. Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alcohol (ethanol [EtOH]) intoxication antagonizes stimulation of muscle protein synthesis and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. However, whether the anabolic response can be reversed when alcohol is consumed after the stimulus is unknown. METHODS: A single bout of electrically stimulated muscle contractions (10 sets of 6 contractions) was induced in fasted male C57BL/6 mice 2 hours prior to alcohol intoxication. EtOH was injected intraperitoneally (3 g/kg), and the gastrocnemius/plantaris muscle complex was collected 2 hours later from the stimulated and contralateral unstimulated control leg. RESULTS: Muscle contraction increased protein synthesis 28% in control mice, while EtOH abolished this stimulation-induced increase. Further, EtOH suppressed the rate of synthesis ~75% compared to control muscle irrespective of stimulation. This decrease was associated with impaired protein elongation as EtOH increased the phosphorylation of eEF2 Thr(56) . In contrast, stimulation-induced increases in mTOR protein complex-1 (mTORC1) (S6K1 Thr(421) /Ser(424) , S6K1 Thr(389) , rpS6 Ser(240/244) , and 4E-BP1 Thr(37/46) ) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (JNK Thr(183) /Tyr(185) , p38 Thr(180) /Tyr(182) , and rpS6S(235/236) ) signaling were not reversed by acute EtOH. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that EtOH-induced decreases in protein synthesis in fasted mice may be independent of mTORC1 and MAPK signaling following muscle contraction and instead due to the antagonistic actions of EtOH on mRNA translation elongation. Therefore, EtOH suppresses the contraction-induced increase in protein synthesis, and over time has the potential to prevent skeletal muscle hypertrophy induced by repeated muscle contraction.
BACKGROUND:Alcohol (ethanol [EtOH]) intoxication antagonizes stimulation of muscle protein synthesis and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. However, whether the anabolic response can be reversed when alcohol is consumed after the stimulus is unknown. METHODS: A single bout of electrically stimulated muscle contractions (10 sets of 6 contractions) was induced in fasted male C57BL/6 mice 2 hours prior to alcohol intoxication. EtOH was injected intraperitoneally (3 g/kg), and the gastrocnemius/plantaris muscle complex was collected 2 hours later from the stimulated and contralateral unstimulated control leg. RESULTS: Muscle contraction increased protein synthesis 28% in control mice, while EtOH abolished this stimulation-induced increase. Further, EtOH suppressed the rate of synthesis ~75% compared to control muscle irrespective of stimulation. This decrease was associated with impaired protein elongation as EtOH increased the phosphorylation of eEF2Thr(56) . In contrast, stimulation-induced increases in mTOR protein complex-1 (mTORC1) (S6K1Thr(421) /Ser(424) , S6K1Thr(389) , rpS6 Ser(240/244) , and 4E-BP1Thr(37/46) ) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (JNKThr(183) /Tyr(185) , p38Thr(180) /Tyr(182) , and rpS6S(235/236) ) signaling were not reversed by acute EtOH. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that EtOH-induced decreases in protein synthesis in fasted mice may be independent of mTORC1 and MAPK signaling following muscle contraction and instead due to the antagonistic actions of EtOH on mRNA translation elongation. Therefore, EtOH suppresses the contraction-induced increase in protein synthesis, and over time has the potential to prevent skeletal muscle hypertrophy induced by repeated muscle contraction.
Authors: José L Areta; Louise M Burke; Megan L Ross; Donny M Camera; Daniel W D West; Elizabeth M Broad; Nikki A Jeacocke; Daniel R Moore; Trent Stellingwerff; Stuart M Phillips; John A Hawley; Vernon G Coffey Journal: J Physiol Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: David Shahbazian; Philippe P Roux; Virginie Mieulet; Michael S Cohen; Brian Raught; Jack Taunton; John W B Hershey; John Blenis; Mario Pende; Nahum Sonenberg Journal: EMBO J Date: 2006-06-08 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Philippe P Roux; Bryan A Ballif; Rana Anjum; Steven P Gygi; John Blenis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Troy A Hornberger; Rudy Stuppard; Kevin E Conley; Mark J Fedele; Marta L Fiorotto; Eva R Chin; Karyn A Esser Journal: Biochem J Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 3.857
Authors: Evelyn B Parr; Donny M Camera; José L Areta; Louise M Burke; Stuart M Phillips; John A Hawley; Vernon G Coffey Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Flavia M Souza-Smith; Charles H Lang; Laura E Nagy; Shannon M Bailey; Loren H Parsons; Gary J Murray Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Bradley S Gordon; Chang Liu; Jennifer L Steiner; Gustavo A Nader; Leonard S Jefferson; Scot R Kimball Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Bradley S Gordon; Jennifer L Steiner; David L Williamson; Charles H Lang; Scot R Kimball Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 4.310