Literature DB >> 25623387

Birth desires and intentions of women diagnosed with a meningioma.

Michelle A Owens1, Benjamin M Craig, Kathleen M Egan, Damon R Reed.   

Abstract

OBJECT To the authors' knowledge, no previous study has examined the impact of meningioma diagnosis on women's birth desires and intentions. In an exploratory study, the authors surveyed women affected by meningioma to determine their attitudes toward childbearing and the influences, including physician recommendations, on this major life decision and compared their responses to those of women in the general population. METHODS Meningioma survivors from the Meningioma Mommas online support group participated in an online survey that included questions on their birth desires and intentions, whether the risk of disease recurrence influenced their reproductive decisions, and risks communicated to them by their physicians. Using chi-square and rank-sum tests, the authors compared the survey participants' responses with those of the general population as assessed by the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth. Logistic regression was used to adjust for differences in age, race, ethnicity, education, parity, pregnancy status, and infertility status in these populations. RESULTS Respondents with meningioma were more likely than those in the general population to report wanting a baby (70% vs 54%, respectively), intending to have a baby (27% vs 12%, respectively), and being very sure about this intention (10% vs 2%, respectively). More than half (32 of 61) of the women of childbearing age reported being advised by a physician about potential risk factors for recurrence of the meningioma, and pregnancy was the most commonly cited risk factor (26 of 61). The most common factor influencing birth desires and intentions was risk of the meningioma returning and requiring more treatment, which was reported by nearly two-thirds of the women in their childbearing years. CONCLUSIONS A majority of the meningioma survivors of childbearing age who completed the survey reported a desire for children, although concern about the risk of meningioma recurrence was an important factor for these women when making reproductive decisions. Physicians are in a position to educate their patients on potential risk factors for recurrence and to provide contact information for services such as counseling and family planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MMS = Meningioma Momma Survey; NSFG = National Survey of Family Growth; National Survey of Family Growth; birth; meningioma; oncology; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25623387      PMCID: PMC4524337          DOI: 10.3171/2014.11.JNS14522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  30 in total

Review 1.  Mobile phone use and risk of intracranial tumors: a consistency analysis.

Authors:  Susanna Lagorio; Martin Röösli
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  Planning and development of the continuous National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Robert M Groves; William D Mosher; James M Lepkowski; Nicole G Kirgis
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 1       Date:  2009-09

3.  Having children after cancer. A pilot survey of survivors' attitudes and experiences.

Authors:  L R Schover; L A Rybicki; B A Martin; K A Bringelsen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Brain tumor and pregnancy.

Authors:  A Isla; F Alvarez; A Gonzalez; A García-Grande; M Perez-Alvarez; M García-Blazquez
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Management Strategy for Meningioma in Pregnancy: A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Imad Kanaan; Ashraf Jallu; Huda Kanaan
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2003-11

6.  Assessment of autoantibodies to meningioma in a population-based study.

Authors:  Joseph L Wiemels; Paige M Bracci; Margaret Wrensch; Joellen Schildkraut; Melissa Bondy; Jon Pfefferle; Mi Zhou; Jennette Sison; Lisa Calvocoressi; Elizabeth B Claus
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Meningiomas in pregnancy: a clinicopathologic study of 17 cases.

Authors:  Eriks A Lusis; Bernd W Scheithauer; Anthony T Yachnis; Bernhard R Fischer; Michael R Chicoine; Werner Paulus; Arie Perry
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  Smoking and risk of meningioma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zuoxu Fan; Tao Ji; Shu Wan; Yaoyao Wu; Yu Zhu; Feng Xiao; Renya Zhan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  Exogenous hormone use and meningioma risk: what do we tell our patients?

Authors:  Elizabeth B Claus; Peter M Black; Melissa L Bondy; Lisa Calvocoressi; Joellen M Schildkraut; Joseph L Wiemels; Margaret Wrensch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Three risk factors for WHO grade II and III meningiomas: A study of 1737 cases from a single center.

Authors:  Peizhi Zhou; Weichao Ma; Senlin Yin; Youping Li; Shu Jiang
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  4 in total

1.  Fertility treatment is associated with multiple meningiomas and younger age at diagnosis.

Authors:  Maryam N Shahin; Stephen T Magill; Cecilia L Dalle Ore; Jennifer A Viner; Pamela N Peters; David A Solomon; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Unique features of pregnancy-related meningiomas: lessons learned from 148 reported cases and theoretical implications of a prolactin modulated pathogenesis.

Authors:  Yosef Laviv; Victoria Ohla; Ekkehard M Kasper
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Meningiomas in Gynecology and Reproduction: an Updated Overview for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Serena Girardelli; Luigi Albano; Giorgia Mangili; Luca Valsecchi; Emanuela Rabaiotti; Paolo Ivo Cavoretto; Pietro Mortini; Massimo Candiani
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Sink or Collaborate: How the Immersive Model Has Helped Address Typical Adolescent and Young Adult Barriers at a Single Institution and Kept the Adolescent and Young Adult Program Afloat.

Authors:  Damon R Reed; Benjamin Oshrine; Christie Pratt; Olivia Fridgen; Cathy Elstner; Leila Wilson; Hatem Soliman; Marie C Lee; Howard L McLeod; Bijal Shah; Kristine A Donovan; Smitha Pabbathi; Mary Turney; Odion Binitie; Christine Healy; Michael Nieder; Peter H Shaw; Andrew Galligan; G Douglas Letson; Marilyn Stern; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Simon Davies
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.