Literature DB >> 25622871

Comparison of rumination activity measured using rumination collars against direct visual observations and analysis of video recordings of dairy cows in commercial farm environments.

V Ambriz-Vilchis1, N S Jessop2, R H Fawcett2, D J Shaw3, A I Macrae4.   

Abstract

Automated systems for monitoring the behavior of cows have become increasingly important for management routines and for monitoring health and welfare. In the past few decades, various devices that record rumination have been developed. The aim of the present study was to compare rumination activity measured with a commercially available rumination collar (RC) against that obtained by direct visual observations and analysis of video recordings in commercial dairy cows. Rumination time from video recordings was recorded by a trained observer. To assess observer reliability, data were recorded twice, and the duration of recorded behaviors was very similar and highly correlated between these 2 measurements (mean=39±4 and 38±4 min/2 h). Measurements of rumination time obtained with RC when compared with analysis of video recordings and direct observations were variable: RC output was significantly positively related to observed rumination activity when dealing with animals housed indoors (trial 1 video recordings: slope=1.02, 95% CI=0.92-1.12), and the limits of agreement method (LoA) showed differences (in min per 2-h block) to be within -26.92 lower and 24.27 upper limits. Trial 1 direct observations: slope=1.08, 95% CI=0.62-1.55, and the LoA showed differences to be within -28.54 lower and 21.98 upper limits. Trial 2: slope=0.93, 95% CI=0.64-1.23, and the LoA showed differences to be within -32.56 lower and 19.84 upper limits. However, the results were poor when cows were outside grazing grass (trial 3: slope=0.57, 95% CI=0.13-1.02, and the LoA showed differences to be within wider limits -51.16 lower and 53.02 upper). Our results suggest that RC can determine rumination activity and are an alternative to visual observations when animals are housed indoors. However, they are not an alternative to direct observations with grazing animals on pasture and its use is not advisable until further research and validation are carried out.
Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy cow; direct observation; rumination activity; validation; video recording

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25622871     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Value of 'Cow Signs' in the Assessment of the Quality of Nutrition on Dairy Farms.

Authors:  Kiro Risto Petrovski; Paul Cusack; Jakob Malmo; Peter Cockcroft
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  The Equipment Used in the SF6 Technique to Estimate Methane Emissions Has No Major Effect on Dairy Cow Behavior.

Authors:  Fabiellen Cristina Pereira; Dayane Lemos Teixeira; Laura Ann Boyle; Luiz Carlos Pinheiro Machado Filho; Shaun Richard Owen Williams; Daniel Enriquez-Hidalgo
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-29

3.  Modern livestock farming under tropical conditions using sensors in grazing systems.

Authors:  Eliéder Prates Romanzini; Rafael Nakamura Watanabe; Natália Vilas Boas Fonseca; Andressa Scholz Berça; Thaís Ribeiro Brito; Priscila Arrigucci Bernardes; Danísio Prado Munari; Ricardo Andrade Reis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Validation of NEDAP Monitoring Technology for Measurements of Feeding, Rumination, Lying, and Standing Behaviors, and Comparison with Visual Observation and Video Recording in Buffaloes.

Authors:  Ray Adil Quddus; Nisar Ahmad; Anjum Khalique; Jalees Ahmed Bhatti
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of indoor living space on dairy cow production, reproduction and behaviour.

Authors:  Jake S Thompson; Christopher D Hudson; Jonathan N Huxley; Jasmeet Kaler; Robert S Robinson; Kathryn J Woad; Nicola Bollard; Jenny Gibbons; Martin J Green
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Rumination and Activity Patterns in Angus and Angus-Cross Beef Calves: Influences of Sex, Breed, and Backgrounding Diet.

Authors:  Bobwealth Omontese; Friday Zakari; Megan Webb
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.231

7.  A Non-Invasive Sound Technology to Monitor Rumen Contractions.

Authors:  Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez; André Luis Alves Neves; Adrian Harrison
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.231

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.