Katrina M Poppert1, Susana R Patton2, Kelsey B Borner2, Ann M Davis2, Meredith L Dreyer Gillette3. 1. Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, and Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, and Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA kati.poppert@gmail.com. 2. Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, and Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, and Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA. 3. Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, and Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluates the utility and psychometric properties of pediatric mealtime assessments (direct observation and parent-report measures) using evidence-based criteria developed by the Division 54 Evidence-Based Assessment Task Force. METHOD: Measures of mealtime behavior used in at least one chronic illness pediatric population were eligible for inclusion. A total of 23 assessment measures were reviewed (16 parent-/self-report; 7 direct observation). RESULTS: 3 parent-report and 4 direct observation measures were classified as well-established, 3 met criteria for approaching well-established, and 13 were categorized as promising. Measures have been primarily used in children with feeding disorders, cystic fibrosis, and autism spectrum disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the literature of pediatric mealtime assessment tools shows a strong evidence base for many direct observation methods and subjective parent-report measures. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses are available for some measures; recommendations for future validation research and measure development across pediatric populations are discussed.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluates the utility and psychometric properties of pediatric mealtime assessments (direct observation and parent-report measures) using evidence-based criteria developed by the Division 54 Evidence-Based Assessment Task Force. METHOD: Measures of mealtime behavior used in at least one chronic illness pediatric population were eligible for inclusion. A total of 23 assessment measures were reviewed (16 parent-/self-report; 7 direct observation). RESULTS: 3 parent-report and 4 direct observation measures were classified as well-established, 3 met criteria for approaching well-established, and 13 were categorized as promising. Measures have been primarily used in children with feeding disorders, cystic fibrosis, and autism spectrum disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the literature of pediatric mealtime assessment tools shows a strong evidence base for many direct observation methods and subjective parent-report measures. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses are available for some measures; recommendations for future validation research and measure development across pediatric populations are discussed.
Authors: Scott W Powers; Kelly C Byars; Monica J Mitchell; Susana R Patton; Debbie A Standiford; Lawrence M Dolan Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Barbara H Fiese; Marcia A Winter; Frederick S Wamboldt; Ran D Anbar; Marianne Z Wamboldt Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2009-09-14 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Garick D Hill; Alan H Silverman; Richard J Noel; Pippa M Simpson; Julie Slicker; Ann E Scott; Peter J Bartz Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Praveen S Goday; Susanna Y Huh; Alan Silverman; Colleen T Lukens; Pamela Dodrill; Sherri S Cohen; Amy L Delaney; Mary B Feuling; Richard J Noel; Erika Gisel; Amy Kenzer; Daniel B Kessler; Olaf Kraus de Camargo; Joy Browne; James A Phalen Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.839