Literature DB >> 25622381

No clinically relevant advantage of intrathecal morphine in total hip arthroplasty?

M G E Fenten, B A J M Keijzer, R Stienstra.   

Abstract

Adding morphine to intrathecal bupivacaine provides sound analgesia, but is associated with side effects. The purpose of this study is to investigate if the contribution of intrathecal morphine to postoperative analgesia for total hip replacement outweighs its side effects in a modern multimodal setting. From November 2012 till January 2013 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) under spinal anesthesia received either plain bupivacaine (group B) or bupivacaine + 0.1 mg morphine (group M). VAS pain scores, PCA morphine consumption and side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus) were registered. 60 patients in group B were compared to 36 patients in group M. Overall morphine consumption and pain scores were low, although they were slightly but significantly lower in group M. Intrathecal morphine was associated with significantly more pruritus. In this study, PCA morphine consumption and pain scores were low in THA with multimodal pain treatment, and the added analgesic value of intrathecal morphine did not outweigh the increased incidence of pruritus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25622381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg        ISSN: 0001-5164


  1 in total

1.  The improved quality of postoperative analgesia after intrathecal morphine does not result in improved recovery and quality of life in the first 6 months after orthopedic surgery: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Nilufar Foadi; Matthias Karst; Anika Frese-Gaul; Niels Rahe-Meyer; Stefan Krömer; Christian Weilbach
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.133

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.