Literature DB >> 25622239

Oral dydrogesterone versus vaginal progesterone gel in the luteal phase support: randomized controlled trial.

Vlatka Tomic1, Jozo Tomic2, Djurdja Zigmundovac Klaic3, Miro Kasum4, Krunoslav Kuna2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare efficacy, satisfaction and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone and micronized vaginal progesterone gel used for luteal supplementation. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. A total of 853 infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment in University Hospital Center "Sisters of Mercy", Zagreb, Croatia. Luteal support was provided as Crinone 8%(®) vaginal progesterone gel (90mg) administered daily, or oral dydrogesterone Duphaston(®) (2× 10mg) administered two times daily. Progesterone was administered from the day of oocyte retrieval (day 0) till pregnancy test or in a case of pregnancy, until week 10.
RESULTS: The on-going pregnancy rates were comparable between Crinone 8%(®) vaginal progesterone gel and oral dydrogesterone - Duphaston(®) (28.1% versus 30.3%; OR 1.11 (0.82-1.49 with 95% CI)). Overall satisfaction and tolerability were significantly higher in the dydrogesterone group than in the Crinone group. Vaginal bleeding, interference with coitus and local adverse side effects such as vaginal irritation and discharge occurred significantly more in Crinone group than in dydrogesterone group.
CONCLUSIONS: Oral dydrogesterone is effective drug, well tolerated and accepted among patients and can be considered for routine luteal support. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01178931; www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dydrogesterone; IVF/ET; Luteal phase support; Pregnancy rate; Vaginal progesterone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25622239     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  8 in total

Review 1.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 2.  Natural Micronized Progesterone Sustained Release (SR) and Luteal Phase: Role Redefined!!

Authors:  Sonia Malik; Korukonda Krishnaprasad
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

3.  Progestogens for preventing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adam J Devall; Argyro Papadopoulou; Marcelina Podesek; David M Haas; Malcolm J Price; Arri Coomarasamy; Ioannis D Gallos
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-19

4.  A Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal support in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Herman Tournaye; Gennady T Sukhikh; Elke Kahler; Georg Griesinger
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Endogenous progesterone levels could predict reproductive outcome in frozen embryo replacement cycles supplemented with synthetic progestogens: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Satoshi Kawachiya; Daniel Bodri; Toshikazu Hirosawa; Jazmina Yao Serna; Akira Kuwahara; Minoru Irahara
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-11-01

6.  Oral dydrogesterone versus intravaginal micronized progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Georg Griesinger; Christophe Blockeel; Gennady T Sukhikh; Ameet Patki; Bharati Dhorepatil; Dong-Zi Yang; Zi-Jiang Chen; Elke Kahler; Claire Pexman-Fieth; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Dydrogesterone as an oral alternative to vaginal progesterone for IVF luteal phase support: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Georg Griesinger; Christophe Blockeel; Elke Kahler; Claire Pexman-Fieth; Jan I Olofsson; Stefan Driessen; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Luteal phase support for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection fresh cycles: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanglin Wu; Songying Zhang; Xiaona Lin; Shasha Wang; Ping Zhou
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.211

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.