Literature DB >> 25621819

Explicit vs. implicit emotional processing: The interaction between processing type and executive control.

Noga Cohen1, Natali Moyal1, Limor Lichtenstein-Vidne1, Avishai Henik1.   

Abstract

The current study examined whether the interaction between emotion and executive control (EC) is modulated by the processing type of the emotional information. Namely, whether the emotional information is explicitly processed, implicitly processed or passively viewed. In each trial, a negative or neutral picture preceded an arrow-flanker stimulus that was congruent or incongruent. Incongruent stimuli are known to recruit EC. Explicit processing of the pictures (Experiment 1a), which required responding to their emotional content, resulted in emotional interference for congruent but not for incongruent stimuli. Similar effects were shown for the passive viewing condition (Experiment 2). In contrast, implicit processing (Experiment 1b), which required responding to non-emotional content, resulted in emotional interference for both congruent and incongruent stimuli. Thus, our findings indicate that implicit emotional processing affects performance independently of EC recruitment. In contrast, explicit emotional processing and passive viewing of emotional pictures lead to reduced emotional interference when EC is recruited.

Keywords:  Emotion; Executive control; Explicit; Flanker; Implicit

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25621819     DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2014.1000830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  5 in total

1.  Implicit reappraisal as an emotional buffer: Reappraisal-related neural activity moderates the relationship between inattention and perceived stress during exposure to negative stimuli.

Authors:  Anoushka D Shahane; Richard B Lopez; Bryan T Denny
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Emotional Face Processing among Treatment-Seeking Individuals with Alcohol Use Disorders: Investigating Sex Differences and Relationships with Interpersonal Functioning.

Authors:  Ben Lewis; Julianne L Price; Christian C Garcia; Sara Jo Nixon
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.826

3.  Limitations of cognitive control on emotional distraction - Congruency in the Color Stroop task does not modulate the Emotional Stroop effect.

Authors:  Elisa Ruth Straub; Constantin Schmidts; Wilfried Kunde; Jinhui Zhang; Andrea Kiesel; David Dignath
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Irrelevant angry faces impair response inhibition, and the go and stop processes share attentional resources.

Authors:  Shubham Pandey; Rashmi Gupta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Valence and arousal of words in visual and conceptual interference control efficiency.

Authors:  Kamil K Imbir; Maciej Pastwa; Marta Jankowska; Marcin Kosman; Aleksandra Modzelewska; Adrianna Wielgopolan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.