Literature DB >> 25621450

Using an environmental public health tracking biomonitoring study to validate safe water restoration efforts in Florida.

Melissa Jordan1, Chris DuClos, Kristina Kintziger, Albert Gray, Mary Ann Bonometti.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Inorganic arsenic is a carcinogen when consumed over many years and is the type of arsenic that is associated with well water. Private wells in many central Florida counties have been found to contain levels of arsenic above 10 μg/L, which is the maximum contaminant level (MCL) established by the US Environmental Protection Agency.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test whether individuals living in homes with arsenic levels above the MCL who use bottled water or have a point of use (POU) filter on their main source of water in the house (eg, kitchen sink) are ingesting unsafe levels of arsenic through other unfiltered water sources in the home.
DESIGN: Case-control study of residents with private wells above (case) and below (control) the MCL for arsenic in drinking water (10 μg/L) conducted between April and July 2013. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Residents with private wells living in Hernando County, Florida, where nearly 400 unique wells of 1200 tested have been found to have elevated arsenic levels (targeted sampling). INTERVENTION: Participants with elevated water arsenic levels were referred to the Florida Safe Water Restoration Program for assistance in obtaining bottled water vouchers and/or POU filters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Creatinine-corrected total urinary arsenic levels and information on water use and consumption behaviors, dietary intake, and other possible exposure sources.
RESULTS: Total urinary arsenic levels were similar for cases using POU filters or bottled water when compared with controls (geometric means of 7.17 and 7.19 μg/L, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The current practice used by the Florida Safe Water Restoration Program of supplying POU filters or bottled water to households with arsenic levels in private wells between 10 and 50 μg/L appears to be sufficient to protect residents from arsenic exposure through tap water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25621450     DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  3 in total

1.  Fulfilling the vision of environmental public health tracking.

Authors:  Judith R Qualters
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  Natural Background and Anthropogenic Arsenic Enrichment in Florida Soils, Surface Water, and Groundwater: A Review with a Discussion on Public Health Risk.

Authors:  Thomas M Missimer; Christopher M Teaf; William T Beeson; Robert G Maliva; John Woolschlager; Douglas J Covert
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Hazard Ranking Method for Populations Exposed to Arsenic in Private Water Supplies: Relation to Bedrock Geology.

Authors:  Helen Crabbe; Tony Fletcher; Rebecca Close; Michael J Watts; E Louise Ander; Pauline L Smedley; Neville Q Verlander; Martin Gregory; Daniel R S Middleton; David A Polya; Mike Studden; Giovanni S Leonardi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.