Literature DB >> 25621420

Variability in and agreement between modeled and personal continuously measured black carbon levels using novel smartphone and sensor technologies.

Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen1, David Donaire-Gonzalez, Ioar Rivas, Montserrat de Castro, Marta Cirach, Gerard Hoek, Edmund Seto, Michael Jerrett, Jordi Sunyer.   

Abstract

Novel technologies, such as smartphones and small personal continuous air pollution sensors, can now facilitate better personal estimates of air pollution in relation to location. Such information can provide us with a better understanding about whether and how personal exposures relate to residential air pollution estimates, which are normally used in epidemiological studies. The aims of this study were to examine (1) the variability in personal air pollution levels during the day and (2) the relationship between modeled home and school estimates and continuously measured personal air pollution exposure levels in different microenvironments (e.g., home, school, and commute). We focused on black carbon as an indicator of traffic-related air pollution. We recruited 54 school children (aged 7-11) from 29 different schools around Barcelona as part of the BREATHE study, an epidemiological study of the relation between air pollution and brain development. For 2 typical week days during 2012-2013, the children were given a smartphone with CalFit software to obtain information on their location and physical activity level and a small sensor, the micro-aethalometer model AE51, to measure their black carbon levels simultaneously and continuously. We estimated their home and school exposure to PM2.5 filter absorbance, which is well-correlated with black carbon, using a temporally adjusted PM2.5 absorbance land use regression (LUR) model. We found considerable variation in the black carbon levels during the day, with the highest levels measured during commuting periods (geometric mean = 2.8 μg/m(3)) and the lowest levels at home (geometric mean = 1.3 μg/m(3)). Hourly temporally adjusted LUR model estimates for the home and school showed moderate to good correlation with measured personal black carbon levels at home and school (r = 0.59 and 0.68, respectively) and lower correlation with commuting trips (r = 0.32 and 0.21, respectively). The correlation between modeled home estimates and overall personal black carbon levels was 0.62. Personal black carbon levels vary substantially during the day. The correlation between modeled and measured black carbon levels was generally good, with the exception of commuting times. In conclusion, novel technologies, such as smartphones and sensors, provide insights in personal exposure to air pollution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25621420     DOI: 10.1021/es505362x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  28 in total

1.  Validate personal air-pollution sensors.

Authors:  Alastair Lewis; Peter Edwards
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Air Pollution and Successful Aging: Recent Evidence and New Perspectives.

Authors:  Gali Cohen; Yariv Gerber
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-03

Review 3.  Air pollution and allergic diseases.

Authors:  Eric B Brandt; Jocelyn M Biagini Myers; Patrick H Ryan; Gurjit K Khurana Hershey
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 4.  New Methods for Personal Exposure Monitoring for Airborne Particles.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

Review 5.  Towards Personal Exposures: How Technology Is Changing Air Pollution and Health Research.

Authors:  A Larkin; P Hystad
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-12

6.  A Spatiotemporal Prediction Model for Black Carbon in the Denver Metropolitan Area, 2009-2020.

Authors:  Sheena E Martenies; Joshua P Keller; Sherry WeMott; Grace Kuiper; Zev Ross; William B Allshouse; John L Adgate; Anne P Starling; Dana Dabelea; Sheryl Magzamen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Urban and transport planning, environmental exposures and health-new concepts, methods and tools to improve health in cities.

Authors:  Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Spatiotemporally resolved black carbon concentration, schoolchildren's exposure and dose in Barcelona.

Authors:  I Rivas; D Donaire-Gonzalez; L Bouso; M Esnaola; M Pandolfi; M de Castro; M Viana; M Àlvarez-Pedrerol; M Nieuwenhuijsen; A Alastuey; J Sunyer; X Querol
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 9.  Features and Practicability of the Next-Generation Sensors and Monitors for Exposure Assessment to Airborne Pollutants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giacomo Fanti; Francesca Borghi; Andrea Spinazzè; Sabrina Rovelli; Davide Campagnolo; Marta Keller; Andrea Cattaneo; Emanuele Cauda; Domenico Maria Cavallo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Personal exposures to traffic-related air pollution in three Canadian bus transit systems: the Urban Transportation Exposure Study.

Authors:  Keith Van Ryswyk; Greg J Evans; Ryan Kulka; Liu Sun; Kelly Sabaliauskas; Mathieu Rouleau; Angelos T Anastasopolos; Lance Wallace; Scott Weichenthal
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.